High-need Community Older Adults Care Delivery Model (HCOACDM)

September 30, 2019 updated by: Kuei-Min Chen, Ph.D., RN., Kaohsiung Medical University

Evaluation of a Care Delivery Model for the High-need Community Older Adults

This study is proposed to: (1) establish a "High-need Community Older Adults Care Delivery Model" (HCOACDM) as a guide to handle complex needs of the high-need community older adults by the care managers at community care centers; and (2) evaluate the effectiveness of applying the HCOACDM to improve the functional ability, quality of life (QOL), depressive symptoms, healthcare and social service utilizations, and care delivery satisfaction of the high-need community older adults.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

A cluster randomized controlled trial with repeated measures design will be conducted to test the effectiveness of six-month HCOACDM on the functional ability, QOL, depressive symptoms, healthcare and social service utilizations, and care delivery satisfaction of the high-need community older adults. The high-need community older adults, screened based on the "High-need Community Older Adults Screening Scale" (HCOASS), will be cluster randomized based on the community care centers, to the intervention group (4 centers) or comparison group (4 centers). Intervention group will receive six-month HCOACDM care and comparison group will receive original routine care provided by the care managers at community care centers. One pre-test and two post-tests, three months apart, of outcome measurements will be conducted on all participants. Moreover, individual semi-structured interviews will be carried out to explore opinions and suggestions toward the HCOACDM of the care managers in intervention group. It is expected that the developed HCOACDM will be useful to provide the long-term care for community older adults and enhance the quality of diverse and complex care delivery system.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

165

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan
        • Community Care Centers

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 100 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • lived in the community at least three months
  • over 65 years old
  • fluently communicated in Mandarin or Taiwanese
  • screened by the High-need Community Older Adults Screening Scale (HCOASS) as high-need older adults

Exclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosed as dementia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HCOACDM
The intervention, the HCOACDM, involves case screening, comprehensive assessment, and care coordination, and will be given over a 6-month period.
The intervention, the HCOACDM, involves case screening, comprehensive assessment, and care coordination, and will be given over a 6-month period.
Active Comparator: Routine care
The routine care services include home visits, telephone checkups, meals on the wheel, and health promotion activities.
The routine care services include home visits, telephone checkups, meals on the wheel, and health promotion activities.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Ability measured by the Barthel Index (BI)
Time Frame: 6 months
A 10-item scale that includes feeding, transfers, grooming, toilet use, bathing, mobility, stairs, dressing, and control of bladder and bowel. Score ranges from 0 to 100; the higher the score, the higher the level of self-care independence of an individual: 0-20 = complete dependence, 21-60 = severe dependence, 61-90 = moderate dependence, 91-99 = mild dependence, and 100 = total independence.
6 months
Quality of Life measured by the World Health Organization quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time Frame: 6 months
A 28-item scale with four dimensions: physical health, psychological health, social relations, and environment. The responses use a 5-point Likert scale; the higher the score, the better the QOL of an individual.
6 months
Depressive Symptoms measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)
Time Frame: 6 months
A 17-item scale uses to assess a client's emotional and physical-psychological status during the past week through a self-report and observations. The total score ranges from 0 to 52: a score > 18 = severe depression, 14-17 = moderate depression, 11-13 = mild depression, 8-10 = borderline depression, and < 7 as normal.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Healthcare and Social Service Utilizations measured by the Resource Usage of the High-concerned Community Older Adults
Time Frame: 6 months
Based on the long-term care services that are provided in Taiwan, 21 resources are itemized in 3 categories: 1) care for the client (8 services), 2) social welfare (10 services), and 3) care for the caregiver (3 services). The researcher will mark the services that have been used by the participants.
6 months
Satisfaction with Care Delivery measured by the Satisfaction Questionnaire of Service Users to Care Managers
Time Frame: 6 months
There are three dimensions in the questionnaire (Chiou, 2011), but only the dimensions of professional abilities (5 items) and interpersonal interactions and attitudes (5 items) are adopted in this study. A 5-point Likert scale is used; the higher the score, the more satisfaction a client has with the service provider.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 8, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • KMUHIRB-F(I)-20170070

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on High-need Older Adults

Subscribe