Working Shift Organization, Caregivers' Satisfaction and Quality of Life at Work, and Performance. (IOTA-REA)

Impact of the Working Shift Organization on the Caregivers' Satisfaction and Quality of Life at Work, and the Performance of the Intensive Care Units.

This is a prospective, non-randomized, multicenter, observational national study, involving centers with different working shift organizations.

Participating centers are 24 French adult intensive care units with different working shift organizations (12-hours shift vs. less than 12-hours shift) in public hospitals.

Caregivers (doctors, nurses and assistant nurses) constitute the population of the study.

The duration of the study is 13 months.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of the working shift organizations on:

  • The intensive care units operation;
  • The use of outside staff;
  • The caregivers' quality of life at work;
  • The caregivers' satisfaction at work;
  • The nursing work environment;
  • Psychosocial and organisational work constraints
  • The performance of the intensive care units;
  • The costs and efficiency of the working shift organizations.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

The critical review of the scientific literature leads us to conclude that there are heterogeneous, and sometimes discordant, results about the impact of a 12-hours working shift organizations on caregivers, hospitals and unit operation, compared with less than 12-hours working shift organizations. This variety and ambiguity of the results could stem from lack of documentation and/or lack of quality of the studies' methodology, the choice of the outcomes, a too short time period for analysis after an organizational change.

In addition, the sociologist analysis is rarely developed. Finally, quite a few studies are declarative, therefore, whatsoever objective outcome is measured.

The determinants of the choice of working shift organization in health facilities are interlinked with multiple factors. Individual and economic factors are considered, as well as clinical risk management, continuity of care and continuity of public services. To the best of our knowledge, no study have evaluated the capacity to maintain a continuity of public health services using 12-hours working shift organization, in particular in French intensive care units subjected to a regulation on nursing and assistant nursing workforce per patient. Besides, there is no data about the impact of 12-hours working shift organization on the performance of intensive care units regarding clinical risk management.

Our hypothesis is that a 12-hours working shift organization may result in a more important number of hours during which the French standard ratio of 1 nurse for 2.5 patients is observed or during which the intensive care beds are not closed, compared with a less than 12-hours working shift organization, with similar caregivers quality of life and performance of intensive care units.

First month of the study: self-administered questionnaires used in order to evaluate nursing work environment (Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index PES-NWI), caregivers quality of life at work (Nottingham Health Profile NHP, Perceived Stress Scale PSS10 and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale HADS) caregivers satisfaction at work (Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire MSQ) and psychosocial and organisational work constraints (NWI-EO) will be completed by caregivers (doctors, nurses and assistant nurses).

During the study a sociologist will carry semi-structured interviews on a subset of caregivers from different participating centers.

Eleventh month: self-administered questionnaires used during the first month of the study will be completed again by all caregivers under the same conditions.

One year study period: human resources, activity and performance data will be collected from the beginning to the end of the study.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

3000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75020
        • Recruiting
        • medical-surgical intensive care unit - TENON hospital (AP-HP)
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

volunteer caregivers: health care staff of 24 intensive care units will be included in the study: doctors, nurses and assistant nurses

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • assistant nurses, nurses, doctors
  • working in an hospital intensive care unit

Exclusion Criteria:

- opposition to use data

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
12 hours
< 12hours

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
intensive care units operation
Time Frame: during 1 year
Percentage of hours during which the French standard ratio of 1 nurse for 2.5 patients in intensive care units is not observed or during which intensive care beds are closed
during 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
use of outside staff
Time Frame: during 1 year
number of hours during which outside staff is used in participating units (temporary staff, staff working overtime or dedicated supply team staff) during unannounced work stoppages
during 1 year
caregivers' quality of life at work
Time Frame: first and eleventh months of the study
doctors, nurses and assistant nurses quality of life at work evaluated by using Nottingham Health Profile (NHP)
first and eleventh months of the study
caregivers' quality of life at work
Time Frame: first and eleventh months of the study
doctors, nurses and assistant nurses quality of life at work evaluated by using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
first and eleventh months of the study
caregivers' quality of life at work
Time Frame: first and eleventh months of the study
doctors, nurses and assistant nurses quality of life at work evaluated by using Perceived Stress Scale (PSS10)
first and eleventh months of the study
caregivers' satisfaction at work
Time Frame: first and eleventh months of the study
Caregivers' satisfaction at work evaluated with the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (20-MSQ) and individual interviews with a sociologist.
first and eleventh months of the study
Nursing Work Environment
Time Frame: During one year
Evaluated with aggregated data of services (absenteeism rate, delay of recruitment, nurses/patient ratio, assistant nurses/patient ratio, nurses/doctor ratio, assistant nurses/doctor ratio, doctors/patient ratio, number of nurse manager, number of hours worked beyond the expected range, bed occupancy rate, number of days during which beds are unexpectedly closed) and compared between the group of twelve hours working and the less than twelve hours working.
During one year
Measure of the performance of intensive care units
Time Frame: during 1 year
adverse events defined as death in intensive care units (matched to IGS2), and/or adverse events (self-extubation) and/or healthcare-associated infections (bacteremia and sepsis on non-bacteremia catheters)
during 1 year
Budgetary impact
Time Frame: during one year

The main outcome measure is the total costs (in €) measured by the total labor costs. Labor will be estimated in full-time equivalents, recorded on the time sheets for both medical and non-medical staff.

The outcome measure is in € and FTEs

during one year
psychosocial and organisational work constraints
Time Frame: first and eleventh months of the study
nurses' and assistant nurses' psychosocial and organisational work constraints evaluated with the Nursing Work Index - Extended Organisation (NWI-EO) questionnaire
first and eleventh months of the study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pierre-Yves BLANCHARD, RN, MSN, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Work-Related Condition

3
Subscribe