- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03915639
Effect of the Peri-incisional Multimodal Cocktail Infiltration on Postcraniotomy Headache
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Fang Luo
- Phone Number: +86 13611326978
- Email: 13611326978@163.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Zheng Chen
- Phone Number: +86 15010130151
- Email: zchan1011@yahoo.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Having signed the informed consent,
- age 18-80 yrs,
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I or II,
- scheduled elective supratentorial craniotomy,
- planned head fixation in a skull clamp.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Allergy to LAs,
- alcohol abuse,
- intracranial hypertension,
- active psychiatric disorders,
- uncontrolled epilepsy,
- chronic opioid use (more than 2 weeks),
- undergoing a revision craniotomy,
- high probability of having postoperative radio- or chemotherapy,
- expectation of delayed extubation or no planned extubation,
- pregnancy or breastfeeding during the study,
- extreme body mass index (BMI) (less than 15 or more than 40),
- preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale less than 15,
- undergoing emergency or awake craniotomy surgery,
- inability to understand the use of the NRS or the PCA. (Patients are informed of the instructions of NRS (from 0 to 10, where 0 and 10 represent no pain and the worst imaginable pain, respectively) and PCA after signing the informed consent the day before the operation. Patients who cannot understand the instruction of NRS and PCA will be excluded from the study.)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Cocktail
Participants in Group Cocktail are planned to infiltrate the head fixation sites after intubation and peri-incisionally prior to skin incision.
The infiltration will be performed by the attending neurosurgeon.
The muscle and the subcutaneous tissue beneath the fixation sites and incision site will be fully irrigated with the multimodal cocktail.
|
The surgeons are planned to inject the cocktail mixture or ropivacaine to muscles and the subcutaneous tissue beneath the fixation sites and incision site using a 22-gauge needle in a sterile fashion prior to skin incision.
|
|
Active Comparator: Ropivacaine
Participants in Group Ropivacaine are planned to infiltrate the head fixation sites after intubation and peri-incisionally prior to skin incision.
The infiltration will be performed by the attending neurosurgeon.
The muscle and the subcutaneous tissue beneath the fixation sites and incision site will be fully irrigated with ropivacaine.
|
The surgeons are planned to inject the cocktail mixture or ropivacaine to muscles and the subcutaneous tissue beneath the fixation sites and incision site using a 22-gauge needle in a sterile fashion prior to skin incision.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cumulative morphine consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours after recovery
|
cumulative morphine consumption through PCA within 24 hours after recovery
|
24 hours after recovery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative 0-10 Numeric Rating Score
Time Frame: 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after recovery and 3 and 6 months after craniotomy
|
Numeric Rating Score is a common used scale in evaluating patients' pain intensity in clinical trials.
The scale in the present trial is ranged from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain.
Higher values represent worse pain intensity.
|
1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after recovery and 3 and 6 months after craniotomy
|
|
Rate of post-operative opioid-related side effects
Time Frame: 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after recovery
|
Post-operative opioid-related side effects include post-operative opioid-induced oversedation, opioid-induced respiratory depression, pruritus, drowsiness, dizziness, blurred vision, and rash. Opioid-induced oversedation will be evaluated using the Pasero Opioid-induced Sedation Scale (POSS).
Opioid-induced respiratory depression (defined as respiratory rate <8/min and/or oxygen saturation <90% and/or apnoea ≥10 s, excessive sedation or upper airway obstruction. |
1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after recovery
|
|
Time interval to first PCA demand
Time Frame: within 24 hours after recovery
|
The PCA device will automatically record the time interval to the first PCA demand based on a specially designed algorithm
|
within 24 hours after recovery
|
|
Total PCA press counts
Time Frame: within 24 hours after recovery
|
The PCA device will automatically record the total press counts based on a specially designed algorithm.
|
within 24 hours after recovery
|
|
Total rescue medication usage
Time Frame: within 24 hours after recovery
|
When PCA is not enough for analgesia, rescue medication will be used for relieving severe pain.
The total rescue medication usage within 24 hours after recovery will be recorded.
|
within 24 hours after recovery
|
|
Recovery
Time Frame: an average of 1 month
|
Time to PACU discharge, time to ambulation, and length of stay (LOS)
|
an average of 1 month
|
|
Wound Healing Score
Time Frame: 3 and 6 weeks after craniotomy
|
Wound Healing Score worksheet for assessment of outcomes in scalp clip versus artery forceps groups in patients undergoing craniotomy. The wound healing evaluation is based on skin healing, infection and hair regrowth. For skin healing, 1 represents fully healed, 2 represents ≤3 cm in total not healed, 3 represents >3 cm not healed, 4 represents areas of necrosis ≤3 cm, and 5 represents areas of necrosis >3 cm. For infection, 1 represents none, 2 represents ≤0.5-cm margin of redness , 3 represents more redness or superficial pus, 4 represents deep infection. For hair regrowth, 1 represents even regrowth along wound, 2 represents ≤3 cm not regrowing , 3 represents 3-6 cm not regrowing, 4 represents >6 cm not regrowing. Excellent wounds, total score of 3; Good wounds, Score 4-5; Suboptimal wounds, Score 6+ |
3 and 6 weeks after craniotomy
|
|
The size of surgical incision
Time Frame: at the end of the craniotomy
|
Recording the size of surgical incision (unit: centimeter)
|
at the end of the craniotomy
|
|
The duration of operation
Time Frame: at the end of the craniotomy
|
Recording the duration of operation (unit:minute)
|
at the end of the craniotomy
|
|
Rate of postoperative complications
Time Frame: within 30 days after craniotomy
|
Postoperative complications include (1) Operative complications: intracranial infection, cerebral oedema, intracranial haematoma, CSF fistula, reoperation, reintubation and delayed extubation.
incision infection, incision haematoma, delayed wound healing; (2) systemic complications: systemic infection, systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis; (3) all-cause mortality
|
within 30 days after craniotomy
|
|
Postoperative antibiotic usage
Time Frame: within 30 days after craniotomy
|
postoperative antibiotic usage
|
within 30 days after craniotomy
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Fang Luo, Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Rocha-Filho PA. Post-craniotomy headache: a clinical view with a focus on the persistent form. Headache. 2015 May;55(5):733-8. doi: 10.1111/head.12563. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
- Papangelou A, Radzik BR, Smith T, Gottschalk A. A review of scalp blockade for cranial surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2013 Mar;25(2):150-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2012.06.024. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
- Akhigbe T, Zolnourian A. Use of regional scalp block for pain management after craniotomy: Review of literature and critical appraisal of evidence. J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Nov;45:44-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.08.027. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
- Artime CA, Aijazi H, Zhang H, Syed T, Cai C, Gumbert SD, Ferrario L, Normand KC, Williams GW, Hagberg CA. Scheduled Intravenous Acetaminophen Improves Patient Satisfaction With Postcraniotomy Pain Management: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2018 Jul;30(3):231-236. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000461.
- Schankin CJ, Gall C, Straube A. Headache syndromes after acoustic neuroma surgery and their implications for quality of life. Cephalalgia. 2009 Jul;29(7):760-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01790.x. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
- Flexman AM, Ng JL, Gelb AW. Acute and chronic pain following craniotomy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010 Oct;23(5):551-7. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32833e15b9.
- Kerr DR, Kohan L. Local infiltration analgesia: a technique for the control of acute postoperative pain following knee and hip surgery: a case study of 325 patients. Acta Orthop. 2008 Apr;79(2):174-83. doi: 10.1080/17453670710014950.
- Busch CA, Shore BJ, Bhandari R, Ganapathy S, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, McCalden RW. Efficacy of periarticular multimodal drug injection in total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 May;88(5):959-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00344.
- Parvataneni HK, Shah VP, Howard H, Cole N, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Controlling pain after total hip and knee arthroplasty using a multimodal protocol with local periarticular injections: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Sep;22(6 Suppl 2):33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.034. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
- Lamplot JD, Wagner ER, Manning DW. Multimodal pain management in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Feb;29(2):329-34. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
- Milani P, Castelli P, Sola M, Invernizzi M, Massazza G, Cisari C. Multimodal Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial on Additional Efficacy of Periarticular Anesthesia. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Nov;30(11):2038-42. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.035. Epub 2015 May 23.
- Spangehl MJ, Clarke HD, Hentz JG, Misra L, Blocher JL, Seamans DP. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Periarticular injections and femoral & sciatic blocks provide similar pain relief after TKA: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):45-53. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3603-0.
- Vendittoli PA, Makinen P, Drolet P, Lavigne M, Fallaha M, Guertin MC, Varin F. A multimodal analgesia protocol for total knee arthroplasty. A randomized, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Feb;88(2):282-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00173.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- KY 2018-035-01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.