Intrathecal Nalbuphine Versus Midazolam in Cesarean Section

December 19, 2019 updated by: olfat abd elmoniem ibrahem, Zagazig University

Nalbuphine Versus Midazolam as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section

Adequate pain management is important to facilitate the functional recovery and enable the patients for rapid rehabilitation of normal activity .

Various adjuvants were being used with intrathecal bupivacain to prolong & improve postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing cesarean section .

The aim of this study was to compare intrathecal nalbuphine versus intrathecal midazolam in patient undergoing cesarean section. The investigators primary aims were to compare the characteristics of sensory and motor block, the effective analgesic time, and analgesic requirement. Secondary aims were to compare the side effects, sedation score and apgare score.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Analgesia is the main point for each patient postoperatively. It is important to provide good analgesia with less hazardous (1). Cesarean section is a painful operation in need for adequate postoperative analgesia (1). Adequate pain management is important to facilitate the functional recovery and enable the patients for rapid rehabilitation of their normal activity (2).

Cesarean section was done under general anesthesia (GA) or regional anesthesia. The subarachnoid blockade is the preferred procedure (3). It avoids the depressant effect of GA on neonate and also the risk of aspiration, with better postoperative pain relief. However the most commonly local anesthetic used, hyperbaric bupivacaine has limited effect lasts for 1.5 - 2 hours (4). Its onset was slow with short duration of postoperative analgesia (3).

Adjuvant drugs added to bupivacaine intrathecally improve the duration and quality of the blockade and prolong the postoperative analgesia (5). Various adjuvants were being used such as alpha2 agonists, neostigmine, opiates, and ketamine etc, yet no drug was identified to specifically inhibit nociception without side effects (6).

Nalbuphine is a synthetic opioid with mixed agonist antagonist effect. It provides a significantly rapid onset of pain relief probably because of its lipophilic properties. It binds to both mu-and kappa receptors, binding of nalbuphine to mu receptors competitively displace other mu-agonists from these receptors without any agonist activity. Therefore decrease the side effects of mu agonist (nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression , urinary retention, pruritis and prolonged sedation) (7). While when binds to kappa receptors nalbuphine has agonist effect (analgesic effect) through the kappa receptors distributed in the brain and spinal cord(1). There were no documented studies of nalbuphine neurotoxicity (5, 8).

Benzodiazepines are used mainly for sedation, anoxiolysis and amnesia. Discovery of their receptors in spinal cord allow the use of midazolam intrathecally for analgesia. Several studies show that the addition of intrathecal midazolam potentiates the analgesic effect of intrathecal bupivacain without significant side effects, or neurotoxicity (9, 10).

There are several studies studied the effect of intrathecal nalbuphine and intrathecal midazolam but to The investigators knowledge no study compares between them.

The aim of this study was to compare intrathecal nalbuphine versus intrathecal midazolam in patient undergoing cesarean section. The investigators primary aims were to compare the characteristics of sensory and motor block, the effective analgesic time, and analgesic requirement. Secondary aims were to compare the side effects, sedation score and apgare score.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Eygpt/zagazig
      • Zagazig, Eygpt/zagazig, Egypt, 002055
        • Olfat Abd Elmoniem Ibrahem Amin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 38 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria: -

  • Female gender .
  • Age : 18 - 40 years old .
  • Physical status : ASA II .
  • Elective cesarean section

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Patient refusal .
  • History of hypertension or cardiac diseases .
  • Psychiatric disorders .
  • Coagulopathy .
  • Allergy to study drugs .
  • Contraindication to spinal anesthesia .
  • Failure of spinal anesthesia .

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: bupivacaine
12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine + 0.5 ml 0.9% normal saline .
compare between nalbuphine versus midazolam as an adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacain to evaluate postoperative analgesia .
Active Comparator: nalbuphine
12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine + 1 mg nalbuphine add in 0.5 ml 0.9% normal saline.
compare between nalbuphine versus midazolam as an adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacain to evaluate postoperative analgesia .
Active Comparator: midazolam
12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine + 2.5 mg midazolam .
compare between nalbuphine versus midazolam as an adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacain to evaluate postoperative analgesia .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effective analgesic time
Time Frame: up to six hours postoperative
the time start from intrathecal injection to the first analgesic dose.
up to six hours postoperative
Total postoperative analgesic dose .
Time Frame: 24 hours
the analgesic dose consumed
24 hours
Onset of sensory and motor block
Time Frame: up tp five minutes after intrathecal injection
the time of onset of sensory and motor block
up tp five minutes after intrathecal injection
duration of sensory and motor block
Time Frame: up to five hours postoperative
the time of duration of sensory and motor block
up to five hours postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sedation score
Time Frame: one hour during surgery

score of sedation:

1= awake and alert 2 = sedated ,respond to verbal stimules 3= sedated respond to a mild physical status 4=sedated respond to a moderate or strong physical stimuls 5= not arousable 5 is the higher value

one hour during surgery
Apgar score
Time Frame: 1-5 minutes after delivery
score for baby
1-5 minutes after delivery
number of participants with hypotension , bradycardia ,vomiting , nausea , shivering number of participants with hypotension , bradycardia ,vomiting , nausea , shivering
Time Frame: up to 24 hours postoperative
incidence of hypotension , bradycardia ,vomiting , nausea , shivering
up to 24 hours postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Olfat A I Amin, MD, Zagazig University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section Pain

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine

3
Subscribe