mFOCUS (Multilevel FOllow-up of Cancer Screening) (mFOCUS)

December 4, 2023 updated by: Jennifer S Haas, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital
To evaluate the effectiveness of the system, team and individual components of mFOCUS vs. standard care by conducting a 4-arm cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of individuals who are due for follow-up of an abnormal cancer screening test.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Standard care consists of well-characterized existing decision support and systems for follow-up in these three participating primary care networks and their affiliated integrated delivery systems (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Dartmouth Hitchcock Health, the largest health care provider in New Hampshire). The primary outcome will be whether an individual receives follow-up, defined based on the type of screening abnormality and organ type (breast, cervical, lung or colorectal cancer), within 120 days of becoming eligible for mFOCUS. Secondary comparisons will assess multi- and cross-level (individual, team, system) outcomes. The study design will allow us to examine the marginal effectiveness of system, team and individual-level enhancements, and exploratory analyses will address subgroups defined by race/ ethnicity, socioeconomic status and cancer type.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

11980

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
    • New Hampshire
      • Hanover, New Hampshire, United States, 03755
        • Dartmouth Hitchcock

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

individuals who have an abnormal screen that is due for follow-up including:

  • Breast: women 40-80 years with an incident (i.e., newly detected) abnormal screening mammogram or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) exam.
  • Cervical: women 21-65 years with an incident abnormal screening Pap.
  • Colorectal: adults 40-80 years with an abnormal screen, including incident FOBT (Fecal Occult Blood Test) / FIT (Fecal Immunochemical Test), or prevalent colonoscopy. Because of the long periods of time required for follow-up of colonoscopies, we will look back over a 5-year period and will therefore find prevalent abnormalities that become due for follow-up.
  • Lung: adults 55-80 years, current and former smokers, with an incident abnormal LDCT (Low Dose Computed Topography) result.

Exclusion Criteria:

We will exclude patients who:

  • are not English or Spanish-speaking
  • have had prior cancer of the organ for each screening test (i.e., women with prior breast cancer will not be tracked for breast cancer screening abnormalities) as these individuals may have non-standard follow-up care recommendations.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard of care
standard of care
Active Comparator: IT platform
Access to an IT platform for visit-based reminders about overdue abnormal cancer screening test results
To evaluate the effectiveness of the system, team and individual components of mFOCUS vs. standard care by conducting a 4-arm cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of individuals who are due for follow-up of an abnormal screen.
Active Comparator: IT platform with reminders
Access to an IT platform that will deliver both visit based and between visit reminders about abnormal cancer screening test results.
To evaluate the effectiveness of the system, team and individual components of mFOCUS vs. standard care by conducting a 4-arm cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of individuals who are due for follow-up of an abnormal screen.
Active Comparator: IT platform and patient navigation
the IT platform available in Arm 3 and navigation to help with scheduling and to address social barriers to care.
To evaluate the effectiveness of the system, team and individual components of mFOCUS vs. standard care by conducting a 4-arm cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of individuals who are due for follow-up of an abnormal screen.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Completion of Follow-up Test
Time Frame: 120 days
Completion of follow-up test within 120 days of eligibility for mFOCUS (EHR)
120 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Complete the Required Diagnostic Evaluation
Time Frame: up to 240 days
How many participants completed the required diagnostic evaluation (EHR), 0-60, 61-120, 121-180, 181-240 day intervals were evaluated.
up to 240 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 24, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 12, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

August 10, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019P000341

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe