Hypofractionated Versus Conventional Fractionation Radiotherapy

July 10, 2019 updated by: Hospital da Baleia

Hypofractionated Versus Conventional Fractionation Radiation After Conservative Surgery or Mastectomy With Irradiation of Lymph Node Drainage: a Phase II Randomized Clinical Trial for the Evaluation of Acute Toxicity

This study was designed to evaluate the acute toxicity and quality of life of hypofractionated radiation versus conventional when regional node irradiation is indicated after breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Investigators hypothesize that hypofractionated radiotherapy is equal effective and safe as conventional radiotherapy in breast cancer patients undergoing regional nodal irradiation.

Eligible breast cancer patients are randomized 1:1 into the following two groups:

  1. Hypofractionated therapy: 40 Gy in 15 fractions of 2.67 Gy in breast or chest wall and nodal drainage with Concurrent boost 48.0 Gy / 3.2 Gy daily in tumor bed, in case of conservative surgery;
  2. Standard fractionation: 50 Gy in 25 fractions in breast or chest wall and nodal drainage with sequential tumor bed boost with 10 Gy in 5 fractions in tumor bed in case of conservative surgery.

Patients will be followed for 6 months after radiotherapy to evaluate acute toxicity and quality of life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female;
  • Older than 18;
  • Breast cancer stage T1 - T3;
  • At least 1 lymph node positive;
  • Treated with mastectomy or conservative surgery;
  • Negative surgical margins;
  • No distant metastasis;
  • No supraclavicular or internal mammary nodes metastases;
  • Adjuvant systemic therapy with chemotherapy, endocrine therapy or anti-HER2 (Human - - Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2) treatment is accepted;
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Positive surgical margins;
  • Concomitant chemotherapy;
  • Supraclavicular or internal mammary nodes metastases;
  • Distant metastasis;
  • Previous thoracic radiotherapy;
  • Bilateral breast cancer;
  • Patients with collagen diseases;
  • Unable or unwilling to sign inform consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional radiotherapy

50 Gy in 25 fractions to chest wall or whole breast and regional lymph regions (supraclavicular fossa with or without axilla), followed by tumor bed boost of 10 Gy in 5 fractions in case of breast conserving surgery.

Total time: 5-6 weeks.

50 Gy / 25 fractions / 5-6 weeks / Sequential boost of 10 Gy in 5 fractions, in case of conservative surgery.
Other Names:
  • Standard fractionation
Experimental: Hypofractionated radiotherapy

40 Gy in 15 fractions (2.67 Gy each) to chest wall or whole breast and regional lymph regions (supraclavicular fossa with or without axilla).

Patients undergoing breast conserving surgery will receive concomitant boost with total dose of 48 Gy in 15 fractions (3.20 Gy each) to tumor bed.

Total time: 3 weeks.

40 Gy / 15 fractions / 3 weeks / Concomitant boost with total dose of 48 Gy in 15 fractions, in case of conservative surgery.
Other Names:
  • Hypofractionated therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CTCAE Toxicity Assessement - Acute Toxicity
Time Frame: Before treatment, every week of treatment (week 1 to 3 or 1 to 5-6, according to the treatment arm), at the end of treatment (week 3 or week 5-6, according to the treatment arm), 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the last fraction received.
Change in acute toxicity will be assessed according to criteria of CTCAE version 4.03.
Before treatment, every week of treatment (week 1 to 3 or 1 to 5-6, according to the treatment arm), at the end of treatment (week 3 or week 5-6, according to the treatment arm), 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the last fraction received.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life - EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3)
Time Frame: Before treatment, at the end of treatment (week 3 or week 5-6, according to the treatment arm),1 and 6 months after last fraction received.
Patients' quality of life will be assessed using self-administered questionnaire EORTC-QLQ-C30 (version 3).
Before treatment, at the end of treatment (week 3 or week 5-6, according to the treatment arm),1 and 6 months after last fraction received.
Quality of Life - EORTC breast cancer module (BR23)
Time Frame: Before treatment, at the end of treatment (week 3 or week 5-6, according to the treatment arm),1 and 6 months after last fraction received.
Patients' quality of life will be assessed using self-administered questionnaire EORTC breast cancer module (BR23).
Before treatment, at the end of treatment (week 3 or week 5-6, according to the treatment arm),1 and 6 months after last fraction received.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gabriel Oliveira B Gil, MD, Baleia Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

July 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Use of a controlled access approach, with a transparent system to review requests and provide secure data access; assurance that patient privacy and confidentiality can be maintained;

IPD Sharing Time Frame

From 2020 onwards

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Principal investigator's e-mail

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Conventional radiotherapy

Subscribe