Conventional With Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Pain Reduction and Quality of Life in Spinal Metastases (RACOST)

May 9, 2022 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

A RAndomized Trial Comparing COnventional With STereotactic Radiotherapy for Pain Reduction and Quality of Life in Spinal Metastases (RACOST-trial)

A randomized, multicentre, phase III study comparing conventional radiotherapy (1x8Gy) with stereotactic radiotherapy (1x20Gy) for pain reduction and quality of life in spinal metastases.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study population: patients with painful spinal metastases from solid tumors without spinal cord compression or cord instability.

Objective: This study will test the hypothesis that stereotactic radiotherapy gives a better and longer lasting reduction of pain, local control and therewith a better quality of life. This in order to optimize and to individualize the treatment options for the patient.

Study design: Complaints due to pain will be analysed using the validated Dutch Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and side-effects will be recorded using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). In addition to this the quality of life will be analysed using the EORTC QOL-C15-PAL and EORTC QLQ-BM22 questionnaires. For analysis of cost-effectiveness the EQ-5D will be used.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Arnhem, Netherlands, 6815 AD
        • Radiotherapiegroep Arnhem
      • Den Haag, Netherlands
        • Medisch Centrum Haaglanden
      • Deventer, Netherlands, 7416 SE
        • Radiotherapiegroep Deventer
      • Maastricht, Netherlands, 6229 ET
        • Maastro clinic
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands
        • Radboudumc Nijmegen
      • Zwolle, Netherlands, 8025 AB
        • Isala

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • solid tumor with radiological diagnosis of spinal metastases
  • pain score minimum 2 on 11-point scale
  • maximum of 2 consecutive or noncontiguous spinal vertebra involved by tumor at current level of interest
  • No or mild neurological signs (radiculopathy, dermatomal sensory change and muscle strength of involved extremity)
  • Karnofsky performance ≥60
  • WHO ≤2
  • life expectancy > 6 weeks
  • age ≥18
  • non-pregnant, non-lactating female patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of previous radiotherapy to the spine at current level of interest
  • spinal instability or neurological deficit
  • pathological fracture or impending fracture needing fixation
  • prior surgery to the spine at current level of interest
  • clinical signs of spinal cord compression or severe neurological deficits
  • patients with a pacemaker such that MRI cannot be performed or the treatment cannot be delivered safely
  • patients unable to undergo MRI
  • earlier nuclear medicine treatment
  • pregnancy
  • altered mental status that would prohibit the understanding and giving of informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm 1
Conventional radiotherapy, 1x8Gy
1x8Gy
Experimental: Arm 2
Stereotactic radiotherapy, 1x20Gy
1x20Gy or equivalent dose fractionation schedule

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain reduction measured by the Dutch Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questionnaire
Time Frame: At six weeks since baseline
Pain is self-reported and measured by the validated Dutch Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questionnaire
At six weeks since baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of time to pain response
Time Frame: pain response is calculated from the date of randomization at day 0-14, week 4, 6, and month 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Pain is self-reported and measured by the validated Dutch Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questionnaire
pain response is calculated from the date of randomization at day 0-14, week 4, 6, and month 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Duration of pain relief
Time Frame: Pain relief is calculated from the date of randomization at day 0-14, week 4, 6, and month 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Pain is self-reported and measured by the validated Dutch Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questionnaire
Pain relief is calculated from the date of randomization at day 0-14, week 4, 6, and month 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Quality of life
Time Frame: Quality of life is calculated from the date of randomization at day 0, 7, 14, week 4, 6, and month 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
EORTC QOL-C15-PAL and EORTC QLQ-BM22 questionnaires
Quality of life is calculated from the date of randomization at day 0, 7, 14, week 4, 6, and month 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Toxicity measured by CTCAE 4.0 questionnaire
Time Frame: up to months 12
Toxicity measuredCTCAE 4.0 questionnaire
up to months 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: P Braam, MD, Radboudumc Nijmegen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 10, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

April 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NL45994.091.14

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Metastases

Clinical Trials on conventional radiotherapy

3
Subscribe