Predictive Value of HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-Vasc Scores After PCI

August 21, 2019 updated by: Mahmoud Osama Sayed Morsy, Assiut University

Predictive Value of HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-Vasc Scores for Clinical Outcome After PCI

To assess the predictive value of two scoring systems, namely HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-VASc scores, to be linked with bleeding events and recurrence of chest pain and other measures of clinical outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention. The investigators aim to provide evidence for local guidelines of optimum options suited to our population

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

Dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and an inhibitor of the platelet P2Y12 receptor is necessary to prevent stent-related thrombotic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). (1) Although continuation of DAPT confers substantial and durable benefits that extend beyond the local stented segment, bleeding risk also increases with continued exposure to antiplatelet therapy. (2) Current guidelines give fixed duration of DAPT after coronary intervention but many patients still having early stent thrombosis despite this fixed policy, while others, on the contrary, suffer minor and major bleeding events. These clinical situations should raise the possibility of individualizing therapy. (5) The rationale of this study is to find a new method to tailor the optimal duration of DAPT for each patient by balancing long-term risks for both coronary thrombosis and major bleeding (MB).

The HAS-BLED (hypertension, abnormal renal/liver function, stroke, bleeding history or predisposition, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, drugs/alcohol concomitantly) score has long been used to predict bleeding events in patients on anticoagulation therapy. (3) Also, the CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, ≥75 years, diabetes, stroke/transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism, vascular disease, elderly, sex) score is a well-established system for prediction of thrombo-embolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. (4) The aim of the present study is to evaluate the predictive ability of these 2 scoring tools when applied to patients undergoing PCI.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

173

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

all patients who are scheduled for elective PCI (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) and also those who undergo urgent primary PCI

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all patients undergoing PCI

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who had undergone unexpected immediate CABG

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of bleeding events
Time Frame: 6 months after PCI
number of bleeding events (epistaxis, bleeding gums, haematuria, GI bleeding, brain bleeding)
6 months after PCI
Rate of ischaemic events
Time Frame: 6 months after PCI
number of ischaemic events (ACS, TIA, stroke, acute limb ischaemia, GI, ischaemia)
6 months after PCI

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HAS-BLED-CHA2DS2-Vasc post-PCI

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Subscribe