Radial accEss Crossover for PErcutaneous Coronary Procedures And ouTcome: the REPEAT Study (REPEAT)

March 10, 2025 updated by: Alessandro Sciahbasi, MD, Ospedale Sandro Pertini, Roma
All patients who undergo to percutaneous coronary diagnostic or interventional procedures through transradial access (TRA) will be screened for inclusion in this prospective observational study and patients with TRA failure necessitating vascular crossover will be included in the Registry after signing a dedicated written informed consent. A Control group of consecutive patients with radial access and without crossover will be included. Primary end point of the study is the rate of in-hospital vascular complications and major bleeding in crossover vs non crossover groups

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All patients who undergo to percutaneous coronary diagnostic or interventional procedures through transradial approach (TRA) will be screened for inclusion in this prospective observational study and patients with TRA failure necessitating vascular crossover will be included in the Registry after signing a dedicated written informed consent. A Control group of consecutive patients with radial access and without crossover will be enrolled (2:1 rate compared to crossover group to avoid possible selection bias) after signing a dedicated written informed consent.

The modality of radial puncture (needle vs cannula), the choice of radial sheath (long vs short; hydrophilic vs non hydrophilic), the type of catheters employed, the use of spasmolytic agents and the choice of secondary vascular access will be left to the operator discretion.

According to the selected secondary access, patients will be divided in two groups: patients with a secondary (or tertiary) wrist access (total wrist Group) and patients with a crossover to femoral (Femoral Group). Patients included in the total wrist group may have a secondary access to the ulnar artery (ipsilateral or contralateral) or to the contralateral radial.

All patients will be checked during the procedure, immediately after and 24 hour post to evaluate possible vascular complications and bleeding.

Patient baseline characteristics, hospital data, comorbid conditions and complications will be recorded in a dedicated electronic case report form.

Exclusion criteria will be: lack of signed informed consent, age <18 years.

Primary End point of the study is the rate of in-hospital vascular complications and major bleeding in crossover vs non crossover groups.

Secondary End-points are:

  • The rate of vascular complications or bleeding in total wrist vs femoral Group.
  • The rate of minor bleeding
  • Procedure duration
  • Fluoroscopy time
  • Number of catheters employed
  • Differences among operators and Centers

Vascular complications are defined as any vascular damage clinically documented as vessel perforation, arterial-venous fistula, pseudoaneurysm, arterial dissection, retroperitoneal hematoma and compartmental syndrome. Major bleeding complications are defined according to the BARC classification, as BARC 3 (overt bleeding plus a hemoglobin drop > 3 g/dL; any transfusion with overt bleeding, cardiac tamponade; bleeding requiring surgical intervention for control; bleeding requiring intravenous vasoactive agents and intracranial haemorrhage) and BARC 5 (fatal bleeding).

Minor bleeding is defined as Hematoma larger than 10 cm not requiring medical intervention (Easy III)

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1357

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Avezzano, Italy
        • Ospedale di Avezzano
      • Roma, Italy
        • Ospedale Sandro Pertini
      • Roma, Italy
        • Policlinico Agostino Gemelli
      • Roma, Italy
        • Policlinico Umberto I
      • Roma, Italy
        • Ospedale S. Camillo
      • Roma, Italy
        • Ospedale Santo Spirito
      • Roma, Italy
        • Ospedale S. Andrea
      • Sassari, Italy
        • Ospedale di Sassari
      • Teramo, Italy
        • Ospedale di Teramo
      • Trento, Italy
        • Ospedale di Trento

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with an indication to percutaneous coronary procedures performed through transradial approach

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients who undergo to percutaneous coronary diagnostic or interventional procedures through transradial access

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of signed informed consent, age <18 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Crossover Group
Patients with Transradial access failure for percutaneous coronary procedures necessitating vascular crossover
Transradial approach for percutaneous coronary procedures. The modality of radial puncture (needle vs cannula), the choice of radial sheath (long vs short; hydrophilic vs non hydrophilic), the type of catheters employed, the use of spasmolytic agents and the choice of secondary vascular access will be left to the operator discretion
Non Crossover Group
Patients with successful transradial access for percutaneous coronary procedures
Transradial approach for percutaneous coronary procedures. The modality of radial puncture (needle vs cannula), the choice of radial sheath (long vs short; hydrophilic vs non hydrophilic), the type of catheters employed, the use of spasmolytic agents and the choice of secondary vascular access will be left to the operator discretion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vascular complications and major bleeding
Time Frame: up to seven days
The rate of in-hospital vascular complications and major bleeding in crossover vs non crossover groups
up to seven days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Minor bleeding
Time Frame: up to seven days
The rate of minor bleeding in crossover vs non crossover groups
up to seven days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

January 16, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pertini06

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Clinical Trials on Transradial access for percutaneous coronary procedures

Subscribe