Two-channel Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia (IV-PCA) After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (TLH)

February 16, 2021 updated by: Seok Kyeong Oh, Korea University Guro Hospital

The Efficacy of New Design Dual Channel Elastomeric Pump for Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: a Randomized, Double-blind, Prospective Study

The purpose of this study is to compare the dual channel intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) with single channel elastomeric pump (only one channel of dual channel pump is used for blinding and the other channel is filled with same volume of saline) in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy, in terms of quality of recovery, efficacy of postoperative pain, drug consumption, adverse event, and patient subjective satisfaction.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Bellomic® M silicone balloon infuser, dual continuous petite type (cebika, Uiwang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea) is a newly designed IV-PCA device that is a 2-channel infusion elastomeric pump with two balloon chambers.

Conventional elastomeric IV-PCA devices were administered with a mixture of drugs in one chamber; when severe opioid related side effects occur, the IV-PCA administration is suspended by clipping, in this situation, not only the analgesic effect of opioid but also the effect of adjuvants could not be applied.

On the other hand, this newly designed device can be controlled as needed by administering adjuvant analgesics or antiemetic agents through another adjustable chamber. It will be expected that facilitate the pain management and increased the patient satisfaction and recovery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 08308
        • Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient who was scheduled to undergo elective TLH under general anesthesia, was a female aged 19-75 years, and had an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • body mass index > 30.0 kg/m2, known hypersensitivity to the drugs used in this study, significant liver or renal dysfunction, or a history of drug abuse or dependence, recent major procedure or surgery, or preoperative analgesic use

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1-channel PCA
Ch-1: fentanyl 16 µg/kg, ketorolac 2 mg/kg, ondansetron 12 mg (total volume 100 ml with normal saline) Ch-2: 100ml normal saline only (for blinding)
Ch-1 (flow 2 ml/hr with bolus 2ml/30min lock-out): fentanyl 16 µg/kg, ketorolac 2 mg/kg, ondansetron 12 mg (total volume 100 ml with normal saline); Ch-2 (flow 2ml/h): 100ml normal saline only (for blinding)
Experimental: 2-channel PCA
Ch-1: fentanyl 16 µg/kg (total volume 100 ml with normal saline) Ch-2: ketorolac 2 mg/kg, ondansetron 12 mg (total volume 100 ml with normal saline)
Ch-1 (flow 2 ml/hr with bolus 2ml/30min lock-out): fentanyl 16 µg/kg (total volume 100 ml with normal saline; Ch-2 (flow 2ml/h fixed): ketorolac 2 mg/kg, ondansetron 12 mg (total volume 100 ml with normal saline)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire (QoR-40K) score
Time Frame: At postoperative 24 hour
Patient recovery measured by QoR-40K score (maximum score 200)
At postoperative 24 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain level was evaluated according to a numeric rating scale
Time Frame: At 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 hours after surgery
(NRS; 0-100; no pain [0] to worst pain imaginable [100])
At 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 hours after surgery
Cumulative consumption of PCA over 48 hours
Time Frame: At postoperative 48 hour
At postoperative 48 hour
The patient's overall satisfaction score
Time Frame: At postoperative 48 hour
(0-10; 0 = un-satisfied to 10 = full-satisfied)
At postoperative 48 hour
Occurrence of adverse effects
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for their entire hospital stay, an expected average of 3-4 days
nausea and vomiting, dry mouth, dizziness, urinary retention, headache, sedation, itchiness, shivering, respiratory depression, confusion, hypotension, and bradycardia
Participants will be followed for their entire hospital stay, an expected average of 3-4 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 3, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 10, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 9, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019GR0294

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

In order to protect patient priavacy and personal information, we will limit the provision of individual participant data

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Clinical Trials on convetional PCA method unsing only 1-channel

3
Subscribe