Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of Different Doses of Morphine Administered in Spinal Anethesia for Pain Relief After Hip Replacement Surgery

February 11, 2026 updated by: Medical University of Silesia

Comparison of Safety Profile and Efficacy of Different Doses of Intrathecal Morphine in Total Hip Replacement.

Pain management after total hip replacement is one of the most important aspects of postoperative care for patients and clinicians alike. One of the most common techniques used in anesthesia for this procedure is spinal anesthesia with concurrent administration of opioids into spinal sac. Addition of opioids not only prolongs the anesthesia but also provides pain relief after the procedure for a limited amount of time. Because of its unique chemical properties morphine provides the longest pain relief amongst currently known opioids lasting up to 24 hours. Unfortunately this beneficial effect is associated with both minor and serious adverse effects, most important of which is respiratory depression.

To limit this potenitialy fatal adverse effect dosing of morphine must be very precise in order to balance advantages and risks.

The aim of the study was to assess effectiveness and safety profile of different doses of morphine administered during spinal anesthesia for pain control.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Silesian Voivodeship
      • Sosnowiec, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland, 41-214
        • Recruiting
        • Wojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczny nr 5 im. św. Barbary
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jakub Żak, MD
    • West Pomeranian Voivodeship
      • Szczecin, West Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland, 70-204
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny nr 1 im. Prof. Tadeusza Sokołowskiego PUM w Szczecinie
    • Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship
      • Gmina Końskie, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship, Poland, 26-200
        • Recruiting
        • Zespół Opieki Zdrowotnej w Końskich
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Wojciech Gola, MD PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent to participate in trial
  • Qualification for total hip replacement surgery
  • ASA physical status I-III
  • BMI 19-30
  • Lack of contraindications for drugs and interventions used in trial

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Incapability to provide informed consent
  • Contraindications for spinal anesthesia
  • Preoperative chronic pain
  • Chronic use of analgesics
  • Obesity (BMI>30)
  • Allergies and other contraindications for drugs used in trial
  • Mental or physical incapability to operate PCA syringe pump

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: M50
In addition to bupivacaine patients received 50 mcg morphine sulphate intrathecaly.
Patients were positioned in sitting position on operating table, interspinous space was identified using anatomical landmarks (intercristal line) and palpation. Entire procedure was conducted with aseptic technique, puncture site was prepared with izopropyl alcohol solution. Skin was anesthetized with subcutaneous injection of 1% lidocaine. Spinal puncture was achieved using median or paramedian technique with 27G pencil-point spinal needle. After confirmation of free flow of cerebrospinal fluid 15 mg of 0,5% bupivacaine was administered intrathecaly. Block level was assessed by lack of sensation to alcohol swab in periumbilical area and complete motor block (Bromage 3).
Postoperatively patients received 1,0g of paracetamol every 6 hours,
All patients were equipped with PCA capable syringe pump (Perfusor Space, B. Braun) with 40 milligrams of oxycodone. Care provider explained thoroughly how to operate the device and educated about possible adverse effects.
Postoperatively patients received 50mg of dexketoprofen intravenously every 8 hours.
Postoperatively patients received 1,0g of metamizole intravenously every 6 hours.
After securing intravenous line each patient received preemptive analgesia with 1,0g paracetamol and 1,0g metamizole.
Postoperatively each patient's vital signs were monitored continuously using patient monitor for 48 hours.
Active Comparator: M100
In addition to bupivacaine patients received 100 mcg morphine sulphate intrathecaly.
Patients were positioned in sitting position on operating table, interspinous space was identified using anatomical landmarks (intercristal line) and palpation. Entire procedure was conducted with aseptic technique, puncture site was prepared with izopropyl alcohol solution. Skin was anesthetized with subcutaneous injection of 1% lidocaine. Spinal puncture was achieved using median or paramedian technique with 27G pencil-point spinal needle. After confirmation of free flow of cerebrospinal fluid 15 mg of 0,5% bupivacaine was administered intrathecaly. Block level was assessed by lack of sensation to alcohol swab in periumbilical area and complete motor block (Bromage 3).
Postoperatively patients received 1,0g of paracetamol every 6 hours,
All patients were equipped with PCA capable syringe pump (Perfusor Space, B. Braun) with 40 milligrams of oxycodone. Care provider explained thoroughly how to operate the device and educated about possible adverse effects.
Postoperatively patients received 50mg of dexketoprofen intravenously every 8 hours.
Postoperatively patients received 1,0g of metamizole intravenously every 6 hours.
After securing intravenous line each patient received preemptive analgesia with 1,0g paracetamol and 1,0g metamizole.
Postoperatively each patient's vital signs were monitored continuously using patient monitor for 48 hours.
Active Comparator: M150
In addition to bupivacaine patients received 150 mcg morphine sulphate intrathecaly.
Patients were positioned in sitting position on operating table, interspinous space was identified using anatomical landmarks (intercristal line) and palpation. Entire procedure was conducted with aseptic technique, puncture site was prepared with izopropyl alcohol solution. Skin was anesthetized with subcutaneous injection of 1% lidocaine. Spinal puncture was achieved using median or paramedian technique with 27G pencil-point spinal needle. After confirmation of free flow of cerebrospinal fluid 15 mg of 0,5% bupivacaine was administered intrathecaly. Block level was assessed by lack of sensation to alcohol swab in periumbilical area and complete motor block (Bromage 3).
Postoperatively patients received 1,0g of paracetamol every 6 hours,
All patients were equipped with PCA capable syringe pump (Perfusor Space, B. Braun) with 40 milligrams of oxycodone. Care provider explained thoroughly how to operate the device and educated about possible adverse effects.
Postoperatively patients received 50mg of dexketoprofen intravenously every 8 hours.
Postoperatively patients received 1,0g of metamizole intravenously every 6 hours.
After securing intravenous line each patient received preemptive analgesia with 1,0g paracetamol and 1,0g metamizole.
Postoperatively each patient's vital signs were monitored continuously using patient monitor for 48 hours.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Analgesic efficacy
Time Frame: 48 hours postoperatively
Analgesic efficacy defined as mean value of NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) at 4, 8, 12 ,24 and 48 hours postoperatively at rest and during rehabilitation/movement.
48 hours postoperatively
Safety profile
Time Frame: 48 hours postoperatively
Frequency of adverse events including excessive sedation (defined as Richmond Agitation Sedation Score RASS≤-1), constipation, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus and respiratory depression defined as sudden drop in respiration rate by ≥90% for ≥10 seconds or cyanosis.
48 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 48 hours postoperatively

Patient satisfaction with pain management measured with Likert scale.

  1. Very satisfied.
  2. Satisfied.
  3. Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied.
  4. Dissatisfied.
  5. Very dissatisfied.
48 hours postoperatively
Length of stay
Time Frame: Up to one week.
Length of stay postoperatively.
Up to one week.
Time to rescue analgesia
Time Frame: 48 hours postoperatively
Amount of time before first bolus of oxycodone delivered by PCA syringe pump.
48 hours postoperatively
Cumulative dose of oxycodone
Time Frame: 48 hours postoperatively
Cumulative dose of oxycodone over 48 hours postoperatively.
48 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 4, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 28, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 28, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Total Hip Replacement

Clinical Trials on Spinal Anesthesia (bupivacaine)

Subscribe