Effects of Extension Biased External Limb Loading in Addition to McKenzie Extension Protocol in Lumbar Derangement Syndrome

December 3, 2021 updated by: Foundation University Islamabad

Low back pain is one of the most common problem affecting one's daily living activities.

McKenzie Method of Mechanical Diagnostic Therapy (MDT) is an appealing modality of treatment. McKenzie classified the lumbar back pain into three categories i.e. lumbar postural syndrome, lumbar dysfunction syndrome and lumbar derangement syndrome.

Progressive extension bias limb loading exercises at lumbar region emphasizes on lumbar extensor musculature. The purpose of the current study is to determine the effects of extension biased lumbar limb loading exercises along with McKenzie extension protocols in the management of patients with lumbar derangement syndrome, which will also be a cost effective management option. It will also add to the existing pool of knowledge in the fields of conservative low back pain treatment, physical therapy, orthopedic manual therapy and musculoskeletal medicine.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Low back pain is one of the most common problem affecting one's daily living activities.

Back pain results from multifactorial etiology with anatomical, psychological, physiological and social consequences and it is often classified as acute, sub-acute and chronic according to pain duration. Upto 71% of people with acute low back pain in primary care report persistent symptoms and therefore there is requirement for effective treatments in those who have not recovered after acute phase. Therapeutic exercises, manual therapy, functional training, modalities, traction, endurance training of back extensors, Kinesio-taping, trigger point therapy, deep friction massage are some of the procedures being safely and effectively applied by physical therapists to combat back discomfort or disorder.

McKenzie Method of Mechanical Diagnostic Therapy (MDT) approach was developed by Robin McKenzie who was a physical therapist from New Zealand back in 1950s. MDT is an appealing modality of treatment focusing on five areas of benefit-including reliable assessment, early prognosis, self-treatment, better outcomes and prevention of recurrence. The evaluation also determine who will get benefit from treatment and who will require another treatment protocols. McKenzie classified the lumbar back pain into three categories i.e. lumbar postural syndrome, lumbar dysfunction syndrome and lumbar derangement syndrome based on symptomatic or mechanical responses observed during repeated lumbar end range movements. The McKenzie Institute Lumbar Spine Assessment will be used to classify the patients into different syndromes and to choose the desired one fulfilling the inclusion criteria of study.

When normal tissues are deformed over a prolonged period it ends with postural syndrome like slouched posture and the postural syndrome may lead to dysfunction or derangement syndromes. Deformation of structures and tissues that causes pain at end ranges of available motion is characterized as dysfunction syndrome. Derangement syndrome is related to displacement of intervertebral disc with or without involvement of radiating pattern of pain along with back pain and fluctuations in symptoms or pain with directional movements can be observed due to force changes on affected intervertebral disc.

Centralizing and Peripherilizing are two important concepts with a strong association towards derangement syndrome. Centralizing reveals that movements or loading moves the most distal pain proximally while Peripherilizing shows movements or loading moves the pain more distally. McKenzie lumbar extension exercises results in reduction, abolition or centralization of symptoms. In Lumbar derangement syndromes following MDT classification system, a subgroup in which symptoms improve with lumbar extension is labeled as posterior derangement syndrome whereas the subgroup in which symptoms improve with lumbar flexion is labeled as anterior derangement syndrome. Work of many researchers, like Peterson, Machado and Paatelma, provided the strongest evidence regarding the validity of McKenzie method of treatment.

Progressive limb loading exercises at lumbar region fall under two categories, one group emphasis on abdominal musculature and the second group emphasize on lumbar extensor musculature. Patient begins from quadruped position and progress towards prone position initiating with low intensity training and progressing towards greater intensity along with spinal compression in case of lumbar extensors. Progression towards prone position at the end range of motion requires greater control of neutral spine thus providing excellent stabilization of lumbar extensors.

A randomized controlled trial on McKenzie treatment approach in people with chronic low back pain conducted by M.H Halliday et al. provide preliminary evidence that treatment effects of McKenzie Exercises are greater when the core principles are followed with significant reduction in pain and disability of 15.2 [95% CI 7.6 to 22.7] and 11.7 [95% CI 5.4 to18.0]. Srivastav et al. conducted a study at mechanical low back pain with significant improvement having p<0.05 at NPRS & MODI after application of lumbar stabilization exercises along with conventional physical therapy.

An international survey conducted in 15 different countries in 2019 regarding McKenzie classification system involving 64.8% lumbar, 29.6% cervical, 5.6% thoracic spine of 750 patients fulfilling MDT criteria revealed 0.1% postural syndrome, 1.7% dysfunction syndrome, 75.4% derangement and 22.8% other. In derangement syndrome 82.5% were extension biased thus Derangement is the most commonly encountered pain syndrome and extension is so far the most common directional preference.

With the help of this study the investigators can determine the effects of extension biased lumbar limb loading exercises along with McKenzie extension protocols in the management of patients with lumbar derangement syndrome, which will also be a cost effective management option. It will add to the existing pool of knowledge in the fields of conservative spinal management, physical therapy, orthopedic manual therapy and musculoskeletal medicine.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Federal
      • Islamabad, Federal, Pakistan, 46000
        • Foundation University Islamabad
      • Islamabad, Federal, Pakistan, 46000
        • Shafi International Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 50 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of age 30 to 50 years
  • Patients of both Gender i.e. Male & Female
  • Lumbar Derangement Syndrome
  • Centralization or Peripheralization phenomenon
  • Constant or Intermittent pain worsening on repeated movements
  • Somatic, radicular or combination of both patterns of pain
  • Positive Radicular signs & symptoms

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lumbar Postural syndrome
  • Lumbar Dysfunction syndrome
  • Post laminectomy/discectomy
  • Spondylolisthesis
  • Osteoporosis/Fractures
  • Cauda equine syndrome
  • Recent history of spinal trauma or surgery
  • Lumbar myelopathy
  • Patients with known metabolic diseases
  • Participants having less than 20% ODI scoring

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: McKenzie Extension with External Limb Loading Protocol

Moist Heat Pack for 10 mins

McKenzie Extension Exercise Protocol

Static:

  1. Lying Prone
  2. Lying prone in extension
  3. Sustained extension
  4. Posture correction

    Dynamic:

  5. Extension in lying
  6. Extension in lying with clinician overpressure
  7. Extension mobilization
  8. Extension in standing

Limb loading for basic stabilization progression of the lumbar extensors. Begin in the quadruped position and progress the intensity by

  1. Flexing one upper extremity
  2. Extending one lower extremity with a leg slide
  3. Extending one lower extremity by lifting it off the mat
  4. Flexing one upper extremity while extending contralateral lower extremity and then alternate to opposite extremities.

    Progress to prone position:

  5. Extending one lower extremity
  6. Extending both lower extremity

Begin in the quadruped position and progress the intensity by

  1. Flexing one upper extremity
  2. Extending one lower extremity with a leg slide
  3. Extending one lower extremity by lifting it off the mat
  4. Flexing one upper extremity while extending contralateral lower extremity and then alternate to opposite extremities.

    Progress to prone position:

  5. Extending one lower extremity
  6. Extending both lower extremity
Other Names:
  • Core stability exercises

Static:

  1. Lying Prone
  2. Lying prone in extension
  3. Sustained extension
  4. Posture correction

    Dynamic:

  5. Extension in lying
  6. Extension in lying with clinician overpressure
  7. Extension mobilization
  8. Extension in standing
Moist Heating for 10 minutes at lumbar spine in prone position using moist heat packs, heated via hydro-collator.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: McKenzie Extension Group

Moist Heat Pack for 10 mins

McKenzie Extension Protocol Sequence

Static:

  1. Lying Prone
  2. Lying prone in extension
  3. Sustained extension
  4. Posture correction

    Dynamic:

  5. Extension in lying
  6. Extension in lying with clinician overpressure
  7. Extension mobilization
  8. Extension in standing

Static:

  1. Lying Prone
  2. Lying prone in extension
  3. Sustained extension
  4. Posture correction

    Dynamic:

  5. Extension in lying
  6. Extension in lying with clinician overpressure
  7. Extension mobilization
  8. Extension in standing
Moist Heating for 10 minutes at lumbar spine in prone position using moist heat packs, heated via hydro-collator.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 2 weeks

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) assess symptoms and severity of low back pain in terms of disablement and the degree to which back pain impacts functional activities. Questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how one's back or leg pain is affecting his/her ability to manage in everyday life. It has good person and item reliability with an excellent test retest reliability (ICC= 0.97) and floor effect of 29.9% and ceiling effect of 3.9%.

ODI will be assessed at the base line and at the end of 2 weeks session. Lower score shows better outcome.

2 weeks
Fall Risk Test
Time Frame: 2 weeks

Biodex Balance System has a fall risk screening test and conditioning protocol based on well-established science and technology. Screening include analytical balance testing by identifying a potential problem and establishes Z-Score on the basis of mean values.

Fall risk will be assessed at the base line and at the end of 2 weeks session. Lower score shows better outcome.

2 weeks
Postural Stability Index PSI will be assessed at the base line and at the end of 2 weeks session.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Postural stability screening test will be used to determine the postural stability index of the participants.
2 weeks
Range of Motion
Time Frame: 2 weeks

Lumbar ROM including Forward bending, Backward bending, Right side bending and Left side bending will be measured using Inclinometers.

ROM will be assessed at the base line and at the end of 2 weeks session. Greater range shows better outcome.

2 weeks
Clinical Test of Sensory Integration of Balance
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Clinical Test of Sensory Integration of Balance (CTSIB) will be assessed at the base line and at the end of 2 weeks session.
2 weeks
Balance Error Scoring System
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) will be assessed at the base line and at the end of 2 weeks session.
2 weeks
STarT Back Screening Tool
Time Frame: 2 weeks

The Keele STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) (9-item version) is a brief validated tool, designed to screen primary care patients with low back pain for prognostic indicators that are relevant to initial decision making.

STarT will be assessed at the base line and at the end of 2 weeks session.

2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shoaib Kayani, DPT, MS-OMPT*, Foundation University Islamabad
  • Study Director: Muhammad Osama, DPT, MSOMPT, CHPE, ACMEd, PhD*, Foundation University Islamabad

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe