Assessing Fluid Status of Peritoneal Dialysis Patients With Assistance of Lung Ultrasound (Fluid-PLUS)

August 12, 2020 updated by: Satellite Healthcare
  • As studied previously, lung congestion is very prevalent however usually asymptomatic in dialysis patients. Fluid overload is associated with hospitalizations, worse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in PD patients.
  • The clinical exam is the only tool used currently to monitor volume status of PD patients, and has been found to have poor sensitivity and specificity for lung congestion compared to lung ultrasound. In current practice, patients are seen and examined monthly at their home dialysis units by the nurses. The nephrologist separately examines the patient monthly, possibly days to weeks after the nurse visit, and potentially only quarterly with the use of telehealth visits.
  • Lung ultrasound is a relatively simple and cheap tool to assess for lung congestion, with little inter-operator variability and good reproducibility.
  • There are limited studies of lung ultrasound in peritoneal dialysis, and none in the United States. Lung ultrasound may be useful as an objective measure of lung congestion in patients without signs or symptoms of fluid overload.

Aims of this study

  • This study aims to determine the prevalence of subclinical fluid overload in peritoneal dialysis patients.
  • The investigators aim to determine the added benefit of lung ultrasound to standard clinical practice of fluid management in PD patients.
  • The investigators aim to assess the association of patient characteristics with lung congestion.
  • The investigators also aim to assess the agreement between nurse physical exam and lung ultrasound for fluid overload.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study Design:

  • Cross-sectional study, inviting PD patients at 10 Northern CA home dialysis units to participate. One-time ultrasound done during monthly nurse visit between December 2019 and March 2020. All patients present for their monthly visit at participating home dialysis units on days in which ultrasound available will be eligible, unless they had already completed an ultrasound for the study.
  • Eligible patients approached for informed consent
  • Ultrasound method: 28 areas of the anterior and lateral thorax examined for B lines, need at least 3 B lines in each field to be counted- recorded for future validation
  • Training: lung ultrasound training modules accredited by American College of Emergency Physicians, in addition to dedicated rotation of ultrasound training during internal medicine residency.
  • Separate nurse clinical evaluation- yes or no, nurse blinded from ultrasound results
  • Patient characteristics obtained from dialysis EHR and form 2728: Age, gender (male sex %), race, ethnicity, case of ESRD, dialysis vintage (mo), PD modality, BMI, DM (%), SBP, DBP, albumin , # of antihypertensives, use of diuretic, use of icodextrin, PD Rx, 24 hour urine volume, lung disease (%), heart failure (%)
  • Lung ultrasound info documented in EHR along with nurse evaluation. If moderate-severe lung congestion on ultrasound, nephrologist notified in person, by phone or fax.
  • Prescription changes from nephrologist (diuretic adjustment, dextrose concentration change, addition of icodextrin, or none) within 2 weeks tracked in EHR and/or in person with dialysis nurse
  • Sample size calculation- assuming 30% subclinical fluid overload prevalence, 95% confidence interval of prevalence of subclinical fluid overload with 10% margin of error-> 81 patients

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Daly City, California, United States, 94014
        • WellBound Daly City
      • Emeryville, California, United States, 94608
        • Satellite WellBound Emeryville
      • Fremont, California, United States, 94538
        • Satellite WellBound Fremont
      • Milpitas, California, United States, 95035
        • Satellite WellBound Milpitas
      • Modesto, California, United States, 95345
        • WellBound Modesto
      • Modesto, California, United States, 95356
        • WellBound North Modesto
      • Mountain View, California, United States, 94040
        • Satellite WellBound Mountain View
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95821
        • WellBound Sacramento
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94109
        • WellBound San Francisco
      • San Jose, California, United States, 95125
        • Satellite WellBound San Jose
      • San Leandro, California, United States, 94577
        • WellBound San Leandro
      • San Mateo, California, United States, 94403
        • Satellite WellBound San Mateo
      • Santa Cruz, California, United States, 95062
        • Wellbound Santa Cruz
      • Santa Rosa, California, United States, 95407
        • WellBound Santa Rosa
      • Stockton, California, United States, 95219
        • WellBound Stockton
      • Vallejo, California, United States, 94590
        • WellBound Vallejo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Goal to enroll all potential peritoneal dialysis patients in clinic without symptomatic lung congestion

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Peritoneal dialysis patients seen at participating Wellbound clinics in Northern California, present for monthly visit on days in which lung ultrasound available

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18, on peritoneal dialysis <3 mo, symptomatic lung congestion (reporting new or worsening shortness of breath over the past 4 weeks on enrollment), patient or nephrologist unwilling to participate in study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of subclinical fluid overload in peritoneal dialysis patients
Time Frame: single monthly nurse visit
percentage of patients with moderate-severe lung congestion on ultrasound and nurse physical exam without fluid overload
single monthly nurse visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Added benefit of lung ultrasound to standard clinical practice of fluid management in PD patients
Time Frame: single monthly nurse visit
percentage of patients with subclinical fluid overload who have a change in PD prescription or diuretics
single monthly nurse visit
Association of patient characteristics with lung congestion
Time Frame: single monthly nurse visit
Odds ratios for lung congestion from subgroup analyses and logistic regression
single monthly nurse visit
Agreement between nurse physical exam and lung ultrasound for fluid overload
Time Frame: single monthly nurse visit
kappa coefficient between lung ultrasound and nurse exam for fluid overload
single monthly nurse visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wael Hussein, MBBS, MSc, Stanford University, Satellite Healthcare

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 2, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SIH_122_Fluid-PLUS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peritoneal Dialysis Complication

Clinical Trials on Lung ultrasound

3
Subscribe