Single Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Surgery Assistant Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Colorectal Cancer

Effect of Single Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Surgery Assistant Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Colorectal Cancer : A Single Arm Trial

Conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for colorectal cancer has been demonstrated to be safe and feasible and present minimally invasive benefits including faster recovery, reduced postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay, also acquiring comparable oncologic outcomes with open surgery. To achieve further minimally invasive outcomes, SILS plus one port surgery was attempted by some surgeons. Preliminary results showed that SILS+1 could achieve better minimally invasive benefits than CLS while preserving oncologic feasibility.

Till now, ERAS has been practiced in colorectal cancer surgery for approximately 20 years. Studies have proven that ERAS is safe and significantly improved the recovery course of patients during perioperative period, meanwhile, the expense could be greatly reduced.

Based on ERAS studies protocols and SILS+1 trials, investigators tried to combine SILS+1 with ERAS, hopefully to provide patients with more safe, economic, feasible and rapid surgery and perioperative strategies.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary tumor diagnosed as adenocarcinoma confirmed pathologically by endoscopic biopsy
  • cT1-4a, N0-3, M0 at preoperative evaluation according to the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual Seventh Edition
  • Located in the cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, the upper segment of the rectum.
  • Diameter ≦ 5cm
  • No severe organ dysfunction
  • Performance status of 0 or 1 on ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) scale
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) score class I or II
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unsuitable for patients undergoing single incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery
  • Patients with Complications caused by colorectal cancer ( bleeding , perforation, obstruction or incomplete obstruction )
  • Previous abdominal surgery
  • Malignant diseases within the past 5years
  • Requirements of simultaneous surgery for another diseases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SILS plus one assistant ERAS

Preoperative:

preadmission information, education, counseling, optimization ( breathing training), shortening fasting time and carbohydrate load

Intraoperative:

The intravenous fluid therapy is restricted. All patients undergo single incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery(SILS plus one).

A suitable warming device (such as forced-air heating blankets) and warmed intravenous fluids are been adopted routinely to keep body temperature

Postoperative:

multimodal analgesia (surgical site infiltration, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, epidural analgesia) early oral intake and move. nasogastric tubes should not be used routinely. Nasogastric tubes inserted during surgery are been removed before reversal of an aesthesia.

SILS plus one port surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery protocol both are methods taking the minimally invasive benefits for the patients including faster recovery, reduced postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay.
Other Names:
  • The program of enhanced recovery After Surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative hospital stays
Time Frame: 1 month
Days from surgery to discharge
1 month
Rehabilitative rate
Time Frame: 4 days
The percentage of patients who met discharge criteria in the fourth day after surgery
4 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Medical cost
Time Frame: 1 month
The patient's expenses from surgery to discharge are recorded in RMB "yuan"
1 month
Postoperative pain score
Time Frame: Once a day from 6 hours to the fourth day after surgery
Postoperative pain is recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score tool on postoperative day . On a scale of 1 to 10, the higher the score, the greater the pain.
Once a day from 6 hours to the fourth day after surgery
Postoperative recovery index
Time Frame: 1 month
The first Time to early mobilization(hour), flatus(hour), liquid diet(hour), soft diet(hour), removal of the Nasogastric tubes(hour) , removal of the peritoneal drainage(hour) are used to assess the postoperative recovery
1 month
Postoperative inflammatory immune response
Time Frame: 3 days
It includes the number of white blood cells and lymphocytes,CRP, IL-6
3 days
compliance with ERAS measures
Time Frame: perioperative
It is defined as if the patients complete every ERAS measure or not. We can defined it "yes " or "not".
perioperative
6 min postoperative walking test(6MWT)
Time Frame: Once a day from the frist to the fourth day after surgery
Study site, subject preparation, trial procedures, and medical monitoring refer to the 6MWT guidelines issued by the American thoracic society in 2002.
Once a day from the frist to the fourth day after surgery
hospital readmissions
Time Frame: 30days
It can be defined as the number of patients readmitted within 30 days because of postoperative complications.
30days
Morbidity and mortality rates
Time Frame: 30 days
Morbidity and mortality rates are defined as postoperative complications graded according to Clavien-Dindo within 30 days.
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wang Yannan, M.D, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

February 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 15, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colorectal Cancer

  • University of California, San Francisco
    Completed
    Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC... and other conditions
    United States
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
    National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    Terminated
    Rectal Cancer | Colon Cancer | Cancer Survivor | Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage I Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage... and other conditions
    United States
  • University of Southern California
    National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    Active, not recruiting
    Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC... and other conditions
    United States
  • M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
    Recruiting
    Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage... and other conditions
    United States
  • Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas...
    United States Department of Defense
    Active, not recruiting
    Colorectal Adenoma | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage 0 Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage I Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIA Colorectal... and other conditions
    United States
  • M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
    National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    Active, not recruiting
    Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC... and other conditions
    United States
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    Completed
    Cancer Survivor | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage I Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Colorectal... and other conditions
    United States
  • Emory University
    Bristol-Myers Squibb; National Cancer Institute (NCI); National Institutes of...
    Completed
    Colorectal Cancer Metastatic | Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IV Colorectal Cancer | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer | Refractory Colorectal Carcinoma | Metastatic Microsatellite Stable Colorectal Carcinoma | Stage IVC Colorectal Cancer
    United States
  • University of Roma La Sapienza
    Completed
    Colorectal Cancer Stage II | Colorectal Cancer Stage III | Colorectal Cancer Stage IV | Colorectal Cancer Stage 0 | Colorectal Cancer Stage I
    Italy
  • University of Southern California
    National Cancer Institute (NCI); Amgen
    Terminated
    Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | RAS Wild Type | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer...
    United States

Clinical Trials on Single incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery

Subscribe