Deficit-specific Training in Spinal Disorders

November 24, 2025 updated by: University of Zurich

Precision Medicine in the Rehabilitation of Locomotor Function: Individual Gait Profiles for Deficit-specific Training Strategies in Spinal Disorders

Impairments of walking function after spinal cord lesion due to, for example, inflammation, ischemia or trauma are exceptionally diverse. Depending on the size, location and completeness of the spinal cord lesion, gait dysfunction is often multifactorial, arising from weakness of leg muscles, sensory impairments or spasticity. Locomotor function in humans with spinal cord damage can be improved through training. However, there are no evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of gait dysfunctions and no excepted standards of gait training in this large and heterogeneous group of patients. A lack of evidence-based guidance and standardisation prevents the development of optimal training programs for patients with spinal cord damage and rather broad and subjective clinical judgement is applied to determine patient care. Objective and quantitative techniques like three-dimensional (3D) full-body movement analysis capable of identifying the most relevant determinants of gait dysfunction at the single-patient-level are not yet implemented as diagnostic tool to guide physical therapy in this heterogeneous group of patients. The objective of this project is to further advance current clinical locomotor training strategies by applying a deficit-oriented gait training approach based on subject-specific, objective gait profiles gleaned from 3D gait analysis in chronic, mildly to moderately gait-impaired individuals with spinal cord damage due to inflammation (in multiple sclerosis, MS) or with traumatic or ischemic spinal cord injury (SCI; motor incomplete). Within a parallel-group clinical trial, gait impaired subjects will be characterized by detailed kinematic 3D gait analysis and either trained according to their individual deficits or treated with non-specific, standard walking therapy for six weeks. It is hypothesized that individually adapted, deficit-oriented training is superior in improving walking function than purely task-related, ambulatory training in patients with spinal cord damage. This project may pave the way to more efficient training approaches in subjects with spinal cord damage by transferring and implementing modern gait assessment techniques into clinical neurorehabilitation and to move towards individual, patient-tailored locomotor training programs.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

63

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zurich, Switzerland, 8008
        • Universitätsklinik Balgrist

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-80 years
  • Diagnosis of chronic spinal cord injury (>6 months cervical or thoracic motor incomplete traumatic or non-traumatic (AIS C, D) above T12 or diagnosis of either primary- progressive, secondary-progressive, or relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis as defined by the revised McDonald criteria for at least 3 months and with at least one spinal cord lesion as verified in clinical MRI images
  • Able to walk without assistance or devices on the treadmill and 10m over ground, but must have impaired walking function as demonstrated by neurological examination.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are pregnant or breast feeding
  • Current orthopaedic problems of lower limbs
  • History of major cardiac condition (e.g., infarction, insufficiency (NYHA II-IV))
  • History of major pulmonary condition (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease GOLD II-IV)
  • Current major depression or psychosis
  • MS exacerbation within 3 months prior to the screening or at any time during the screening period
  • Participation in another training study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Deficit-oriented training group
All participants will receive training three times a week for 6 weeks (18 training sessions) at the University Hospital Balgrist, Spinal Cord Injury Centre. Each exercise session will last for 1 hour and will be conducted and supervised by an experienced physical therapist.
Active Comparator: Non-specific, standardised walking training group
All participants will receive training three times a week for 6 weeks (18 training sessions) at the University Hospital Balgrist, Spinal Cord Injury Centre. Each exercise session will last for 1 hour and will be conducted and supervised by an experienced physical therapist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Six minute walk test (6MWT)
Time Frame: Change from screening at 10 weeks
Change from screening at 10 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MS-patients: Expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Time Frame: Change from screening at 10 weeks
neurological score, range from 0 to 10, lower values better than higher values
Change from screening at 10 weeks
SCI-patients: ISNCSCI by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA protocol)
Time Frame: Change from screening at 10 weeks
Perceptions of light touch (LT) and pinprick (PP) stimuli are scored as 0 for absent, 1 for impaired and 2 for normal (range for sum score for pin prick and light touch: 0-112). Motor function is scored on the Medical Research Council Scale of 0 for total paralysis to 5 for normal strength. Ten muscles are tested bilaterally and individual muscle scores are added together, yielding an ASIA motor score that ranges from 0 to 100. For all assessments higher scores are better than lower scores.
Change from screening at 10 weeks
SCI-patients: Walking index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI II)
Time Frame: Change from screening at 10 weeks
Range from 0-20, higher values are better than lower values.
Change from screening at 10 weeks
MS-/ SCI-patients: Six-minute walk test (6MWT)
Time Frame: 10 weeks
10 weeks
MS-patients. Timed 25-foot walk (T25FW)
Time Frame: Change from screening at 10 weeks
Change from screening at 10 weeks
SCI-patients: Timed 10-meter walk test (10MWT)
Time Frame: Change from screening at 10 weeks
Change from screening at 10 weeks
MS-/ SCI-patients: Timed up and go test (TUG)
Time Frame: Change from screening at 10 weeks
Change from screening at 10 weeks
MS-/ SCI-patients: Kinematic measures on treadmill
Time Frame: Change from screening at 6 and 10 weeks
A set of key kinematic parameters will be quantified describing leg, trunk and arm movements during walking on a treadmill including range of motion (in degrees) of hip, knee and ankle joints.
Change from screening at 6 and 10 weeks
MS-/ SCI-patients: Kinetic measures
Time Frame: Change from screening at 6 and 10 weeks
A set of key kinetic parameters will be quantified describing forces of weight loading for both feet using pedobarography.
Change from screening at 6 and 10 weeks
MS-/ SCI-patients: Electromyographic measures
Time Frame: Change from screening at 6 and 10 weeks
EMG measures include timing of leg muscle activity during walking on treadmill.
Change from screening at 6 and 10 weeks
MS-/ SCI-patients: Time to swim 10m
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 weeks
Change from baseline at 6 weeks
MS-/ SCI-patients: Kinematic parameters of leg movements during swimming (activity sensors)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 weeks
A set of key kinematic parameters will be quantified describing leg movements during swimming including range of motion (in degrees) of hip, knee and ankle joints.
Change from baseline at 6 weeks
MS-/SCI-patients: Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-III)
Time Frame: Change from screening at 10 weeks
Change from screening at 10 weeks
MS-/ SCI-patients: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 10 weeks
Change from baseline at 10 weeks
MS-/ SCI-patients: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 10 weeks
Change from baseline at 10 weeks
MS-/ SCI-patients: over ground gait kinematics during clinical walking tests (activity sensors)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 10 weeks
Change from baseline at 10 weeks
MS-/ SCI-patients: 12-item WS for walking function (questionnaire)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 10 weeks
Questionnaire, range from 12-60 points, lower values are better than higher values.
Change from baseline at 10 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 19, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

November 19, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Gait training

Subscribe