Effect on Gait Pattern During Robot Assisted Gait Training (RAGT) of End-effector Type in Burn Patients

August 19, 2024 updated by: Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital
This study aimed to investigate gait pattern and muscles power improvement of patient with gait disturbance caused by burns after end-effector type robot (Morning Walk®)-assited gait training (RAGT). This study randomly assigned 36 patients to one of two group : 30 minutes of Morning Walk® training with 30 minutes conventional physiotherapy (RAGT group) or 60 minutes of conventional physiotherapy (CON group). Five training sessions per week were given for 8 weeks. The primary outcomes were gait performance and muscles powers, which were assessed by the functional ambulation category (FAC) and the manual muscles test (MMT), respectively. The secondary outcomes included 6-minute walking test (6MWT), gait kinematic and spatiotemporal gait parameters. The results of this study is anticipated that the patients with gait disturbance receiving the RAGT might improve greater in gait performance and normal gait patterns that those trained with conventional physiotherapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients with burn injuries to the lower extremities experience gait dysfunctions due to pain or joint contractures, and gait asymmetry occurs due to complications on the affected side. The persisting gait asymmetry placed these patients at risk for potential negative consequences, such as loss of bone mineral density of the affected side, overuse injury on the unaffected side due to compensatory actions, compromised postural control, and gait inefficiencies. Early gait training through physical therapy is a pivotal strategy for enhancing patients' quality of life, functional outcomes and mitigating burn-related complications. The conventional physical therapy is instrumental in fostering an increased range of motion (ROM) and mitigating contractures following burns or skin grafts. Physical therapy centers on patients' positioning, ROM, muscles strength, endurance, balance, coordination, and respiratory rehabilitation.Previous studies using end-effector type RAGT for patients with gait disturbances have demonstrated that RAGT combined with conventional physiotherapy could significantly improved walking speed, gait performance, and motor power . This study aimed to investigate gait pattern and muscles power improvement of patient with gait disturbance caused by burns after end-effector type robot (Morning Walk®)-assited gait training (RAGT).

This study randomly assigned 36 patients to one of two group : 30 minutes of Morning Walk® training with 30 minutes conventional physiotherapy (RAGT group) or 60 minutes of conventional physiotherapy (CON group). Five training sessions per week were given for 8 weeks. The primary outcomes were gait performance and muscles powers, which were assessed by the functional ambulation category (FAC) and the manual muscles test (MMT), respectively. The secondary outcomes included 6-minute walking test (6MWT), gait kinematic and spatiotemporal gait parameters. The results of this study is anticipated that the patients with gait disturbance receiving the RAGT might improve greater in gait performance and normal gait patterns that those trained with conventional physiotherapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who underwent split thickness skin graft (STSG) at Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital
  • with full or virtually full thickness involvement ( >50% of the body surface area of the lower extremity)
  • aged >18 years
  • with ≤ 1 functional ambulation category (FAC) score of ≤3 were included in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • who had fourth-degree burns (involving muscles, tendons, and bone injuries)
  • severe communication disorders due to intellectual impairment and psychologic problems
  • body weight > 135kg or height >195cm
  • physical status that could limit physical therapy (severe deformity or contracture of limbs, open wounds, or pressure ulcers, severe osteoporosis).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: robot assisted gait training
Morning Walk® is a new end-effector type robot developed by Hyundai Heavy Industries and Taeha Mechatronics for lower limb rehabilitation in the patients with gait disturbance.The RAGT group received RAGT with robot training for 30 minutes and conventional physiotherapy for 30 minutes per session
Morning Walk® is a new end-effector type robot developed by Hyundai Heavy Industries and Taeha Mechatronics for lower limb rehabilitation in the patients with gait disturbance.The RAGT group received RAGT with robot training for 30 minutes and conventional physiotherapy for 30 minutes per session.
The control group received conventional physiotherapy for 60 minutes per session. Conventional physiotherapy consisted of 30 minutes of therapist-assisted gait and balance training and 30 minutes of strengthening exercises. The both group patients received five training sessions per week for 8 weeks (a total of 40 sessions).
Active Comparator: conventioanl gait training
The control group received conventional physiotherapy for 60 minutes per session. Conventional physiotherapy consisted of 30 minutes of therapist-assisted gait and balance training and 30 minutes of strengthening exercises. The both group patients received five training sessions per week for 8 weeks (a total of 40 sessions).
The control group received conventional physiotherapy for 60 minutes per session. Conventional physiotherapy consisted of 30 minutes of therapist-assisted gait and balance training and 30 minutes of strengthening exercises. The both group patients received five training sessions per week for 8 weeks (a total of 40 sessions).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
functional ambulatory category
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Ambulatory ability was rated by using the functional ambulatory category (FAC) scale.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6 minute walking test
Time Frame: 8 weeks
6MWT was performed in accordance with the standardised guidelines, and the walking course was 20 m. Patients were instructed to walk as far as possible in 6 min
8 weeks
gait parameters(cadence)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
steps/minutes
8 weeks
gait parameters(gait speed)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Measure walking speed
8 weeks
gait parameters(step length)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Measure the distance between steps
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 15, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HangangSHH-20

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burns

Clinical Trials on robot assisted gait training

Subscribe