Improving Quality of Bier Block

May 19, 2020 updated by: RAGAA AHMED HERDAN, Assiut University

Magnesium Sulphate Versus Fentanyl: Effects on the Quality of Bier Block: Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial

Intravenous regional anesthesia is one of the well-known techniques of regional anesthesia for short surgical operations on the upper and lower limbs. It was first introduced back in 1908. Later on it was popularized even more for the same purpose by using two tourniquets to isolate an exsanguinated extremity then injection of local anesthesia. It was proved over time to be safe and effective with minimal side effects and complications.

Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) has been used over the 20th century for prevention and treatment of pre-eclamptic and eclampsia seizures during pregnancy because of its superior safety profile over other drugs used for the same purpose. The specific mechanisms of action of magnesium sulfate still unclear but are probably multi-factorial. It may act as a vasodilator on peripheral as well as cerebral vasculature, to decrease peripheral vascular resistance and/or relieve vasoconstriction. Additionally, it may also protect the blood-brain barrier and limit cerebral edema formation, or it may also act as a central anticonvulsant.

Fentanyl; was first introduced back in 1990 for palliative use as fentanyl patch. Few years later, it became available in different forms of administration being highly lipophilic. Few years later it became the most widely used synthetic opioid in medicine. It is an opioid analgesic with a rapid onset and short duration of action. It is a potent μ-opioid receptor pure agonist. Fentanyl is 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine. Fentanyl has a relatively wide therapeutic index, which makes it a very safe surgical anesthetic drug when monitored carefully.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Two Intravenous lines will be inserted one at a distal point on the arm to be blocked and other one in the other arm for fluids infusion. The block will be executed by injecting the target medicine in 10 ml increments in a blinded manner of total of 40 ml (study drugs diluted in normal saline 0.9% solution.

  1. Group (L): will receive lidocaine 3 mg/kg total of 40 ml (control group)
  2. Group (M): will receive lidocaine 3 mg/kg total of 40 ml plus Magnesium sulphate 30 mg/kg maximum 1.5 gm, mixed with the second 20 ml of block solution.
  3. Group (F): will receive lidocaine 3 mg/kg total of 40 ml plus fentanyl 1 mcg/kg, mixed with lidocaine given after the first 20 ml of block solution.

Equipment: Local anesthetic agent: lidocaine HCl (2%), Rubber tourniquet, IV catheters (20- or 24-gauge), 500-mL or 1-L bag of IV solution (crystalloid), Infusion set, Pneumatic tourniquet, ideally with a double cuff, One Esmarch bandage (about 150 cm in length, 10 cm in width), Syringes.

Preparation: The patient lies in the supine position with the vein selected for block placement is readily accessible. Baseline vital signs are assessed; blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and ECG monitoring. Intravenous access in the non-operated extremity is obtained. Small doses of benzodiazepine for anxiolysis or small aliquots of opioids in case of discomfort will be available if needed. For safety and securing success, pneumatic cuffs will always be checked for air leaks prior to each IVRA procedure. Clinical staff performing the technique should have ready access to intra-lipid in case it is needed.

Technique:

  1. Secure IV cannula in the extremity opposite to the block side.
  2. A double pneumatic tourniquet is fixed on a padding layer of soft cloth or cotton with the proximal cuff high on the upper arm.
  3. An IV cannula is inserted and secured into a peripheral vein of the operative limb, as far distally as possible.
  4. The entire limb is elevated for 1 to 2 minutes to allow for passive exsanguination. Afterwards, while still keeping the limb high, a rubber (Esmarch) bandage is wrapped around it spirally from distal end proximally till the distal cuff of the double tourniquet.
  5. The artery is digitally occluded by inflating the proximal cuff 100 mm Hg above systolic arterial blood pressure.
  6. After reaching the correct pressure, the Esmarch bandage is removed.
  7. A total of 40 mL of the study medicine according to the protocol is injected slowly in 10 ml increments via the IV catheter.
  8. After the injection, the arm is lowered to the level of the table. The used IV cannula is removed, and in a sterile manner, pressure is quickly applied over the puncture site.

The onset of anesthesia is + 5 minutes after injection. When the patient reports the tourniquet pain, the distal cuff should be inflated and the proximal cuff is deflated about 20 to 30 minutes after the beginning of anesthesia

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

75

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • scheduled for short surgical procedures (30 - 60 minutes) distal to elbow
  • age 18-55 years old
  • ASA I - II
  • both genders
  • average weight BMI (25 - 35).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • seizure diseases
  • allergy to the used medicine
  • local infection
  • patients with sickle cell anemia, Raynaud's disease, scleroderma, myasthenia gravis, significant cardiac or hepatic diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group (L)
Patients will receive lidocaine 3 mg/kg total of 40 ml (control group)
Drug: Lidocaine
Patients will receive lidocaine 3 mg/kg total of 40 ml (control group).
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group M
Patients will receive lidocaine 3 mg/kg total of 40 ml plus Magnesium sulphate 30 mg/kg maximum 1.5 gm, mixed with the second 20 ml of block solution.
Drug: Magnesium Sulphate
Patients will receive lidocaine 3 mg/kg total of 40 ml plus Magnesium sulphate 30 mg/kg maximum 1.5 gm, mixed with the second 20 ml of block solution.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group F
Patients will receive lidocaine 3 mg/kg total of 40 ml plus fentanyl 1 mcg/kg, mixed with lidocaine given after the first 20 ml of block solution.
Drug: Fentanyl
Patients will receive lidocaine 3 mg/kg total of 40 ml plus fentanyl 1 mcg/kg, mixed with lidocaine given after the first 20 ml of block solution.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS score
Time Frame: 2 hours
Onset of tourniquet pain after deflating proximal tourniquet. VAS consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits WHERE 0='no pain AND 10= severe pain.
2 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
3-point scale for motor function
Time Frame: 6 hours
0: normal motor function, 1: reduced motor strength but able to move fingers, 2: complete motor block
6 hours
3-point scale for sensory function
Time Frame: 6 hours
0: normal sensation, 1: loss of sensation of cold (analgesia), 2: loss of sensation of touch (anesthesia).
6 hours
Total Supplement Analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours
Total dose of pethidine 10 mg increments that will be used when the patients experience tourniquet pain >3 VAS.
24 hours
Complications
Time Frame: 24 hours
Number of patients with any intraoperative or postoperative complications will be recorded and treated.
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Assiut University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 14, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 31, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 21, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Quality IVRA

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Analgesia

Clinical Trials on Lidocaine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Spain

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe