Evaluation of Unilateral Ultrasound Guided Paravertebral Block as Perioperative Analgesia For Lower Limb-Sparing Surgery In Adult Cancer Patients

June 14, 2020 updated by: Ahmed Abdalla, Cairo University

Evaluation of Unilateral Ultrasound Guided Paravertebral Block as Perioperative Analgesia For Lower Limb-Sparing Surgery In Adult Cancer Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

Ultrasound imaging has revolutionized the practice of regional anesthesia in that the operator can visualize and identify the paravertebral space, needle during its passage through the tissues, as well as deposition and spread of local anesthetic into the desired spaces. The usage of ultrasound may facilitate more rapid block onset and prolong duration with the added advantage of decrease in drug dosage, reduction in incidence of local anesthetic toxicity, increase success rate, reduction in procedure pain and better patient satisfaction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Paravertebral block targets drug delivery to the site of pain, thus decreasing opioids use. It can provide greater overall comfort with lower pain scores and greater tolerance of physical activity during the initial postoperative period.

Ultrasound imaging has revolutionized the practice of regional anesthesia in that the operator can visualize and identify the paravertebral space, needle during its passage through the tissues, as well as deposition and spread of local anesthetic into the desired spaces. The usage of ultrasound may facilitate more rapid block onset and prolong duration with the added advantage of decrease in drug dosage, reduction in incidence of local anesthetic toxicity, increase success rate, reduction in procedure pain and better patient satisfaction.

To the best of researchers' knowledge, evaluation of unilateral ultrasound guided paravertebral block as perioperative analgesia for lower limb-sparing surgery in adult cancer patients was not investigated before.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11451
        • Ahmed Abdalla Mohamed

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Physical status ASA II and III.
  2. Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 Years.
  3. Body mass index (BMI): > 20 kg/m2 and < 40 kg/m2.
  4. Patient undergoing lower limb-sparing surgery for cancer surgeries under general anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient refusal.
  2. Known sensitivity or contraindication to local anesthetics.
  3. History of psychological disorders and/or chronic pain.
  4. Coagulopathies with INR ≥1.5: hereditary (e.g. hemophilia, fibrinogen abnormalities & deficiency of factor II) - acquired (e.g. impaired liver functions with PC less than 60 %, vitamin K deficiency & therapeutic anticoagulants drugs).
  5. Significant liver or renal insufficiency.
  6. Localized infection at the site of block.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Paravertebral group (group P):
After induction of general anesthesia and stabilization of the patients, they were positioned in lateral decubitus position with the side to be blocked uppermost.

In both groups, one reading of mean arterial pressure and heart rate were taken before induction of general anaesthesia and were defined as baseline readings and then were recorded intra-operatively at 15 min intervals.

Additional bolus doses of fentanyl 0.5µg/kg were given when the mean arterial blood pressure or heart rate raised above 20% of baseline levels.

Other Names:
  • Control group (group C):
Experimental: Control group (group C):
Patients underwent surgery under general anesthesia and received the perioperative routine protocol of analgesia (IV fentanyl 2 μcg/kg at induction and 1 gm of IV paracetamol).

In both groups, one reading of mean arterial pressure and heart rate were taken before induction of general anaesthesia and were defined as baseline readings and then were recorded intra-operatively at 15 min intervals.

Additional bolus doses of fentanyl 0.5µg/kg were given when the mean arterial blood pressure or heart rate raised above 20% of baseline levels.

Other Names:
  • Control group (group C):

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total intraoperative fentanyl consumption.
Time Frame: 24 hours
Total intraoperative fentanyl consumption.
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analouge Scale at 0 , 4 , 8 ,12 ,24 hours postoperatively.
Time Frame: 24 hours
Visual Analouge Scaleat 0 , 4 , 8 ,12 ,24 hours postoperatively.The VAS consists of a 10-cm line, with anchors at either end. One end is marked "no pain" and the other end is marked "the worst imaginable pain". The patient marks the place on the line to indicate his or her pain intensity. The clinician then measures the line with a ruler and assigns a score.
24 hours
Heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure .
Time Frame: 24 hours
Heart rate(beat per minutes) and mean arterial blood pressure(mm HG)
24 hours
Morphine consumption postoperatively for 24 hours..
Time Frame: 24 hours Postoperative
Morphine consumption per mg postoperatively for 24 hours..
24 hours Postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Enas Mohamed Samir, M.D, Cairo University
  • Study Director: Walaa Y Elsabeeny, M.D, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 9, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MS-270-2019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Until ending the investigator's work

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Unilateral U/S PVB

Clinical Trials on Paravertebral group (group P):

Subscribe