The Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy and Hemodynamic Effects of Paravertebral Block Compared With Paravertebral and Intercostal Nerve Block for Thoracotomy in Adults.

May 30, 2021 updated by: Kumar Sundeep, Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan

The Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy and Hemodynamic Effects of Paravertebral Block Compared With Paravertebral and Intercostal Nerve Block for Thoracotomy in Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trail

Thoracotomy is a surgical procedure associated with severe post operative pain during the first day of surgery and is responsible for prolonged hospital stay, patient dissatisfaction and delayed return to normal activities along with increased morbidity and mortality. Investigators intend to compare the efficacy of two analgesic interventions (continuous infusion of paravertebral block (PVB) after loading dose compared with intercostal nerve block and continuous infusion of PVB without loading dose) on postoperative thoracotomy pain. The results of this study will direct the investigators to find the best practice methods which will reduce the postoperative thoracotomy pain, the overall cost of pain management and length of patient's hospital stay.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objective To compare the safety, efficacy for pain relief and hemodynamic changes of two analgesic interventions(continuous infusion of Paravertebral block (PVB) after loading dose compared with intercostal nerve block and continuous infusion of PVB without loading dose)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Karachi, Pakistan
        • Aga Khan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All ASA I-IV adult patients between the ages of 18-70 years scheduled for elective thoracotomy
  • Either sex

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Neurological or psychiatric diseases
  2. Emergency Procedures.
  3. Language barrier
  4. Patients under chronic treatment with opioids
  5. Patients with hypersensitivity to bupivacaine
  6. Coagulation disorders.
  7. Unwilling to participate.
  8. Patient previously involved in other studies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Paravertebral Block (PVB) group

Under complete aseptic precaution, Patient will be in lateral decubitus position a paravertebral catheter will be placed by the surgeon before closure of thoracotomy wound. The catheter will be introduced percutaneously through 18 gauge needle into the pleural cavity.

The tip of catheter will be loaded by anaesthesiologist with 0.25 % isobaric bupivacaine with 20 ml followed by continuous infusion with bupivacaine 0.25 % at 6-8 ml per hour

A paravertebral catheter will be placed by the surgeon before closure of thoracotomy wound. The catheter will be introduced percutaneously through 18 gauge needle into the pleural cavity. The tip of catheter will be loaded by anaesthesiologist with 0.25 % isobaric bupivacaine with 20 ml followed by continuous infusion with bupivacaine 0.25 % at 6-8 ml per hour
Active Comparator: Paravertebral block/Intercostal Block (PVB/ICB) group
Under complete aseptic precaution, patient will be in lateral decubitus position a paravertebral catheter will be placed by surgeon into pleural cavity and will not be loaded with bolus dose. At the end of surgery the (consultant anaesthesiologist) will perform intrathoracic unilateral intercostal nerve block two level above and two level below and at site of incision with 4 ml per level of 0.25 % bupivacaine followed by continuous infusion with 0.25 % bupivacaine at 6-8 ml/hour through catheter placed in paravertebral space.
A paravertebral catheter will be placed by surgeon into pleural cavity and will not be loaded with bolus dose. At the end of surgery the (consultant anaesthesiologist) will perform intrathoracic unilateral intercostal nerve block two level above and two level below and at site of incision with 4 ml per level of 0.25 % bupivacaine followed by continuous infusion with 0.25 % bupivacaine at 6-8 ml/hour through catheter placed in paravertebral space.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Score
Time Frame: 24 hours
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain Score in cm (0cm = No pain and 10 cm= Worst pain possible)
24 hours
Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 24 hours
Blood pressure in mmHg
24 hours
Heart Rate
Time Frame: 24 Hours
Heart rate per minute
24 Hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total postoperative narcotic consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours
Patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) nalbuphine or Tramadol consumption in mg
24 hours
Sedation score
Time Frame: 24 hours
Ramsay sedation scale: 1= anxious or restless, or both, 2 = Co-operative, oriented, and tranquil, 3 = Responding to commands, 4 = brisk response to stimulus, 5 = sluggish response to stimulus, 6 = no response to stimulus
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-0797-7328

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on Paravertebral Block (PVB) group

3
Subscribe