County Level Correlates of HPV Vaccine Series Completion Among Children Ages 11-14 Years in Indiana

February 24, 2022 updated by: Gregory Zimet, Indiana University

The overall objective is to document geographic variability in HPV vaccine series completion across the state of Indiana and to identify factors associated with low versus high rates of completion.

Objective a: To map HPV vaccine series completion rates across Indiana's 92 counties for children aged 14 years and younger. Hypothesis: The investigators expect wide variability in completion rates from county to county. Further, the investigators expect significantly less variability in county-level administration of vaccines required for middle-school entry (Tdap, MenACWY, and HepA vaccines).

Objective b: To identify county-level characteristics associated with HPV vaccine series completion rates across Indiana's 92 counties. Hypothesis: The investigators expect factors reflective of pragmatic obstacles to be associated with lower completion rates: such as lower population density, fewer primary health care providers (HCP) per capita, longer commute to work, lower median household income, and lower rates of insurance coverage of children.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The investigators will obtain HPV vaccine series completion data from the Indiana State Department of Health Immunization Information System (IIS) registry. The data will include all children 9 through 14 years of age who received the 1st dose of HPV vaccine during the 2017 and 2018 calendar years. A minimum of 18 months after 1st dose administration will be allowed for follow-up evidence of two-dose series completion. For comparison purposes, the investigators will also request Tdap, MenACWY, and HepA administration coverage. Tdap, MenACWY, and HepA vaccines are all required for middle-school-entry in the state of Indiana. The investigators already have data on missed opportunities for the 1st dose of HPV vaccine during the 2017 calendar year. Again, for comparison purposes, the investigators will request similar data for 2018. Tdap, MenACWY, and HepA administration rates will focus on children 11-14 years of age. County-level data will include measures of population density, primary health care providers per capita, mean household income, child insurance coverage, children living in poverty, length of work commute, participation in health screening behaviors, and other sociodemographic, health, and quality of life factors covered in CountyHealthRankings.Org.

the primary variable of interest is 2-dose series completion for HPV vaccination, measured via IIS data. All children and adolescents ages 9-14 years who received their first dose of vaccine during the 2017 and 2018 calendar years will be followed for series completion. For comparison purposes IIS data on Tdap, MenACWY, HepA, and HPV vaccine (missed opportunities for 1st dose) also will be derived from the IIS. Potential predictors of HPV vaccine series completion will be derived from CountyHealthRankings.Org. The County Health Rankings program is a collaborative effort of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute. Multiple health and sociodemographic indices measured at the county level are compiled and made publicly available on the website. As noted above, county-level measures derived from this program include population density, primary health care providers per capita, mean household income, child insurance coverage, children living in poverty, length of work commute, participation in health screening behaviors, and other sociodemographic, health, and quality of life factors covered in CountyHealthRankings.Org.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

122152

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Indiana University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

9 years to 14 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All children with Indiana Immunization Information System (IIS) records who are 9 through 14 years of age and received their first dose of HPV vaccine during the 2017 or 2018 calendar years. All information on vaccination will be examined only at the county and state levels. No individual information will be used.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children aged 9 through 14 years of age in Indiana who received the first dose of HPV vaccine during the 2017 or 2018 calendar year.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children younger than 9, as HPV vaccine is not licensed for children under 9 years of age
  • Children older than 14 when they receive the first dose of vaccine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Children aged 14 years or younger
All children in Indiana aged 14 years and younger who received the first dose of HPV vaccine during the 2017 and 2018 calendar years. This is a non-interventional study, with data to be analyzed at the county level only.
Extraction of county- and state-level data on HPV vaccine completion from Indiana's Immunization Information System

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of children who complete the 2-dose HPV vaccine series
Time Frame: 2017-2020
For those children aged 14 years and younger who received the first dose of HPV vaccine in 2017 or 2018 we will measure what percentage complete the second dose of vaccine during 18 months of follow-up.
2017-2020

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of children who receive other adolescent vaccines
Time Frame: 2017-2018
Receipt of Tdap, MenACWY, and HepA vaccination
2017-2018

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gregory D Zimet, PhD, Indiana University School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 9, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 24, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 24, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MISP# 60560

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Human Papillomavirus Vaccination

Clinical Trials on Immunization Information System Review

Subscribe