Reliability and Validity Study for SWE of Shoulder Muscles in Persons After Stroke. (SWE_stroke)

December 13, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Ghent

Reliability and Validity Study to Assess the Test-retest and Intra-rater Reliability of SWE in Shoulder Muscles in Persons After Stroke.

This study aims

  1. To examine the reliability of SWE assessment in the shoulder muscles of persons after a stroke.
  2. To assess if differentiation can be made between the hemiplegic (HP) and non-hemiplegic (NHP) side and between stroke patients and matched healthy volunteers (discriminative validity).
  3. To assess if an immediate effect on the pectoralis major and minor can be measured after applying transversal stretch technique to the pectoralis major muscles (response validity).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Stroke patients will be assessed on 2 days with an interval of 3 days (Friday - Monday).

Day 1 (Friday): shear wave velocity (SWV) will be assessed by 2 assessors in randomised order. Each assessor will evaluate SWV of 6 shoulder muscles (m. supraspinatus, m. infraspinatus, m. rhomboid major, m. deltoideus, m. pectoralis major, m. pectoralis minor).

At the end of the assessment secondary outcome measures will be assessed.

Day 2 (Monday): SWV will be reassessed by assessor 1 to measure test-retest reliability.

Position of the patient will be changed. SWV of the pectoralis major and minor muscle will be reassessed.

Assessor 2 will perform a transversal stretch of the m. pectoralis major or a passive mobilisation of the hand at the hemiplegic arm of the stroke patients. Assessor 1 will reassess the SWV of the pectoralis major and minor muscle to assess if there is an immediate effect of the intervention. Assessor 1 will be blinded for the intervention.

Healthy controls (matched for age, gender and BMI):

Only one test day to assess SWV of 6 shoulder muscles. Secondary outcome measures will be assessed after SWE assessment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

23

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ghent, Belgium, 9000
        • Ghent University Hospital
      • Ghent, Belgium, 9000
        • Ghent University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Stroke group

Inclusion:

  • Stroke patients in the subacute phase after stroke (< 6 months post stroke)
  • Able to sit independently with support of the back, but without support of the arms
  • With upper-limb (UL) impairment: i.e. no maximum score (36) on the shoulder elbow part of the Fugl-Meyer UL (FM UL)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other neurologic disorders
  • Shoulder or neck surgery before stroke onset
  • Arthroscopic surgery in the last year before stroke onset.
  • Shoulder or neck pain in the last year before stroke onset.
  • Severe cognitive or language deficits that inhibit the participants of understanding simple commands or providing valuable information regarding the outcome measures - measured with the Ability Q.
  • Participants who are not able to maintain the test position.
  • Pregnancy

Healthy controls can participate if they

  • Have not suffered a stroke or other neurological disorders
  • Did not have surgery at the shoulder and/or neck
  • Did not have arthroscopic surgery in the last year before stroke
  • If they do not suffer any shoulder or neck pain

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Stroke group

SWE for 6 shoulder muscles will be performed by 2 assessors in randomised order.

  • m. supraspinatus
  • m. infraspinatus
  • m. rhomboideus major
  • m. deltoideus
  • m. pectoralis major
  • m. pectoralis minor

SWE for 6 shoulder muscles will be performed.

  • m. supraspinatus
  • m. infraspinatus
  • m. rhomboideus major
  • m. deltoideus
  • m. pectoralis major
  • m. pectoralis minor

SWE for 6 shoulder muscles will be performed.

  • m. supraspinatus
  • m. infraspinatus
  • m. rhomboideus major
  • m. deltoideus
  • m. pectoralis major
  • m. pectoralis minor
Transversal stretch of pectoralis major muscle on the hemiplegic side.
Passive mobilisation of the hemiplegic hand.
Active Comparator: Healthy controls

SWE for 6 shoulder muscles will be performed by 1 assessors.

  • m. supraspinatus
  • m. infraspinatus
  • m. rhomboideus major
  • m. deltoideus
  • m. pectoralis major
  • m. pectoralis minor

SWE for 6 shoulder muscles will be performed.

  • m. supraspinatus
  • m. infraspinatus
  • m. rhomboideus major
  • m. deltoideus
  • m. pectoralis major
  • m. pectoralis minor

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SWV m. supraspinatus
Time Frame: Single point of assessment on day 1 (test)
Shear wave velocity of the m. supraspinatus
Single point of assessment on day 1 (test)
SWV m. supraspinatus
Time Frame: Single point of assessment on day 2 (retest)
Shear wave velocity of the m. supraspinatus
Single point of assessment on day 2 (retest)
SWV m. infraspinatus
Time Frame: Single point of assessment on day 1 (test)
Shear wave velocity of the m. infraspinatus
Single point of assessment on day 1 (test)
SWV m. infraspinatus
Time Frame: Single point of assessment on day 2 (retest)
Shear wave velocity of the m. infraspinatus
Single point of assessment on day 2 (retest)
SWV m. rhomboideus major
Time Frame: Single point of assessment on day 1 (test)
Shear wave velocity of the m. rhomboideus major
Single point of assessment on day 1 (test)
SWV m. rhomboideus major
Time Frame: Single point of assessment on day 2 (retest)
Shear wave velocity of the m. rhomboideus major
Single point of assessment on day 2 (retest)
SWV m. deltoideus
Time Frame: Single point of assessment on day 1 (test)
Shear wave velocity of the m. deltoideus
Single point of assessment on day 1 (test)
SWV m. deltoideus
Time Frame: Single point of assessment on day 2 (retest)
Shear wave velocity of the m. deltoideus
Single point of assessment on day 2 (retest)
SWV m. pectoralis major
Time Frame: Single point of assessment on day 1 (test)
Shear wave velocity of the m. pectoralis major
Single point of assessment on day 1 (test)
SWV m. pectoralis major
Time Frame: Single point of assessment on day 2 (retest)
Shear wave velocity of the m. pectoralis major
Single point of assessment on day 2 (retest)
SWV m. pectoralis minor
Time Frame: Single point of assessment on day 1 (test)
Shear wave velocity of the m. pectoralis minor
Single point of assessment on day 1 (test)
SWV m. pectoralis minor
Time Frame: Single point of assessment on day 2 (retest)
Shear wave velocity of the m. pectoralis minor
Single point of assessment on day 2 (retest)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Demographic variables
Time Frame: Baseline assessment day 1
Age, gender, weight, height, dominance, date of birth, stroke date, type of stroke, side of paresis
Baseline assessment day 1
Passive range of motion of shoulder
Time Frame: Baseline assessment day 1
Goniometric measurement of shoulder flexion, abduction, external rotation, internal rotation (degrees)
Baseline assessment day 1
Spasticity shoulder muscles
Time Frame: Assessment day 1
Modified Ashworth Scale (minimum 0 - maximum 4, higher score is more spasticity = worse outcome) of shoulder flexors, extensors, internal rotators, external rotators, adductors, abductors
Assessment day 1
Shoulder subluxation - ultrasound measurement
Time Frame: Assessment day 1
Acromiohumeral distance of the hemiplegic and non-hemiplegic shoulder subtracted
Assessment day 1
Fugl-Meyer assessment upper limb section
Time Frame: Assessment day 1
Active recovery of the upper limb motor function
Assessment day 1
Subjective feeling of shoulder stiffness
Time Frame: Assessment day 1
Question to the patients about how stiff the shoulder feels
Assessment day 1
Sports before stroke
Time Frame: Assessment day 1
Question if stroke patients performed sports before stroke and which sports they performed before stroke
Assessment day 1

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subcutaneous tissue thickness
Time Frame: Single point of assessment on day 1
Measurement de thickness of the subcutaneous layer on the ultrasound image of the m. pectoralis major to compare the stroke group and healthy control group.
Single point of assessment on day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Annelies Maenhout, Prof, University Ghent
  • Principal Investigator: Kristine Oostra, Prof, University Hospital, Ghent
  • Principal Investigator: Dirk Cambier, Prof, University Ghent

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 5, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 27, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 27, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on SWE assessor 1

Subscribe