Development of a Clinical Screening, Diagnostic and Evaluation Tool for Patients With Lower Limb Lymphedema: Aim 1 (EvaLymph-Leg1)

July 1, 2024 updated by: Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Development of a Clinical Screening, Diagnostic and Evaluation Tool for Patients With Lower Limb Lymphedema (LLL): Reliability, Concurrent Validity and Clinical Feasibility of Currently Applied Measurement Tools in Patients With LLL

Of all of the different measurement methods that are currently available for use in clinical practice for assessing the same lymphedema characteristic (for example water displacement versus perimetry, both assessing swelling) or different lymphedema characteristics (for example water content in the skin versus hardness of the skin versus thickness of the skin), a clear overview about the reliability, concurrent validity (if applicable) and clinical feasibility is missing for the assessment of lower limb lymphedema (LLL).

The objective of this observational cross-sectional study is to investigate the (day-to-day) reliability and clinical feasibility of currently applied measurement tools in patients with LLL.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with unilateral or bilateral, primary or secondary LLL will be recruited in the center for lymphedema in UH Leuven.

The healthy controls will be age, gender & BMI matched subjects.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patient group

  • Unilateral or bilateral, primary or secondary Lower limb lymphedema (LLL)
  • Objective diagnosis of lymphedema: ≥ 5% volume difference between both legs OR ≥ 2 minor/ 1 major criteria on lymphoscintigraphy OR presence of ICG dermal backflow
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Able to read, understand and speak Dutch

Healthy controls

- Age, gender & BMI-matched healthy controls

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant participants
  • Presence of chronic venous insufficiency C4, C5, C6; deep venous thrombosis; post-thrombotic syndrome
  • Presence of skin infections of wounds at the level of the lower limbs at the moment of inclusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
patients with unilateral or bilateral, primary or secundary lower limb lymphedema (LLL)
patients with unilateral or bilateral, primary or secundary LLL who visit the center for lymphedema at UH Leuven
pitting test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skinfold test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skin hardness test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with MoistureMeterD at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with SkinFibroMeter at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; circumference measurements at the level of the leg and midline region; perometry at the level of the leg; water displacement measurement at the level of the foot; measurements with bio-impedance spectroscopy/analysis devices at the level of the lower limbs and a questionnaire regarding skin integrity (ICC compression questionnaire) that should be completed by the therapist and a self-reported disease-specific quality of life questionnaire (Lymph-ICF-LL) that is completed by the patient at the end of this evaluation
pitting test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skinfold test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skin hardness test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with MoistureMeterD at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with SkinFibroMeter at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; circumference measurements at the level of the leg and midline region; perometry at the level of the leg; water displacement measurement at the level of the foot; measurements with bio-impedance spectroscopy/analysis devices at the level of the lower limbs and a questionnaire regarding skin integrity (ICC compression questionnaire) that should be completed by the therapist
pitting test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skinfold test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skin hardness test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with MoistureMeterD at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with SkinFibroMeter at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; circumference measurements at the level of the leg and midline region; perometry at the level of the leg; water displacement measurement at the level of the foot; measurements with bio-impedance spectroscopy/analysis devices at the level of the lower limbs and a questionnaire regarding skin integrity (ICC compression questionnaire) that should be completed by the therapist
healthy controls
age, BMI and gender matched to the patients with LLL
pitting test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skinfold test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skin hardness test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with MoistureMeterD at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with SkinFibroMeter at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; circumference measurements at the level of the leg and midline region; perometry at the level of the leg; water displacement measurement at the level of the foot; measurements with bio-impedance spectroscopy/analysis devices at the level of the lower limbs and a questionnaire regarding skin integrity (ICC compression questionnaire) that should be completed by the therapist and a self-reported disease-specific quality of life questionnaire (Lymph-ICF-LL) that is completed by the patient at the end of this evaluation
pitting test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skinfold test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skin hardness test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with MoistureMeterD at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with SkinFibroMeter at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; circumference measurements at the level of the leg and midline region; perometry at the level of the leg; water displacement measurement at the level of the foot; measurements with bio-impedance spectroscopy/analysis devices at the level of the lower limbs and a questionnaire regarding skin integrity (ICC compression questionnaire) that should be completed by the therapist
pitting test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skinfold test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skin hardness test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with MoistureMeterD at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with SkinFibroMeter at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; circumference measurements at the level of the leg and midline region; perometry at the level of the leg; water displacement measurement at the level of the foot; measurements with bio-impedance spectroscopy/analysis devices at the level of the lower limbs and a questionnaire regarding skin integrity (ICC compression questionnaire) that should be completed by the therapist
subgroup (n=40)
a subgroup of subjects (patients & healthy controls) will be evaluated again 2 weeks later
pitting test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skinfold test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skin hardness test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with MoistureMeterD at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with SkinFibroMeter at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; circumference measurements at the level of the leg and midline region; perometry at the level of the leg; water displacement measurement at the level of the foot; measurements with bio-impedance spectroscopy/analysis devices at the level of the lower limbs and a questionnaire regarding skin integrity (ICC compression questionnaire) that should be completed by the therapist and a self-reported disease-specific quality of life questionnaire (Lymph-ICF-LL) that is completed by the patient at the end of this evaluation
pitting test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skinfold test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skin hardness test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with MoistureMeterD at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with SkinFibroMeter at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; circumference measurements at the level of the leg and midline region; perometry at the level of the leg; water displacement measurement at the level of the foot; measurements with bio-impedance spectroscopy/analysis devices at the level of the lower limbs and a questionnaire regarding skin integrity (ICC compression questionnaire) that should be completed by the therapist
pitting test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skinfold test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skin hardness test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with MoistureMeterD at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with SkinFibroMeter at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; circumference measurements at the level of the leg and midline region; perometry at the level of the leg; water displacement measurement at the level of the foot; measurements with bio-impedance spectroscopy/analysis devices at the level of the lower limbs and a questionnaire regarding skin integrity (ICC compression questionnaire) that should be completed by the therapist
pitting test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skinfold test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; skin hardness test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with MoistureMeterD at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; measurement with SkinFibroMeter at the level of the foot, leg and midline region; circumference measurements at the level of the leg and midline region; perometry at the level of the leg; water displacement measurement at the level of the foot; measurements with bio-impedance spectroscopy/analysis devices at the level of the lower limbs and a questionnaire regarding skin integrity (ICC compression questionnaire) that should be completed by the therapist and a self-reported disease-specific quality of life questionnaire (Lymph-ICF-LL) that is completed by the patient at the end of this evaluation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Within-session reliability of pitting test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region
Time Frame: baseline (within-session)

intra and interrater reliability of pitting test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region;

The grading of edema is determined by pit depth (measured visually) and recovery time from grade 0-3. The scale is used to rate the severity and the scores are as follows:

- Grade 0: No clinical edema- Grade 1: Slight pitting (up to 2 mm depth) - Grade 2: Moderate pitting (2-5 mm) - Grade 3: Noticeably deep pit (>5 mm)

baseline (within-session)
Within-session reliability of skinfold test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region
Time Frame: baseline (within-session)
intra and interrater reliability of skinfold test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region Skin and subcutaneous tissue is lifted between thumb and index(and, if possible, compared to the contralateral side) Outcome:If skinfold is increased; yes(1), otherwise; no(0)
baseline (within-session)
Within-session reliability of skin hardness test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region
Time Frame: baseline (within-session)

intra and interrater reliability skin hardness test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region.

Skin is palpated with thumb and index (and, if possible, compared to the contralateral side) Outcome: If skin is hardened; yes(1), otherwise; no(0)

baseline (within-session)
Within-session reliability of measurement with MoistureMeterD at the level of the foot, leg and midline region
Time Frame: baseline (within-session)

intra and interrater reliability of measurement with MoistureMeterD at the level of the foot, leg and midline region.

This device can be applied to measure the percentage of water under the skin in terms of the Tissue Dielectric Constant value, making use of a probe with 300 MHz signal. Up to a depth of 2.5mm, this portable device allows measuring free and bounded water in the tissue through which the electromagnetic wave passes.

Outcome: %PWC(% Percentage Water Content)

baseline (within-session)
Within-session reliability of measurement with SkinFibroMeter at the level of the foot, leg and midline region
Time Frame: baseline (within-session)

intra and interrater reliability of measurement with SkinFibroMeter at the level of the foot, leg and midline region.

This device is a relatively recently developed device which consists of a 1-mm-long intender and records the resistance to 50 gram of pressure by using its reference plate and related built-in force sensors. Outcome: The resistance from the skin to deformation when an external force is applied, is expressed as a number in Newton (N) and represents the induration of the skin.

baseline (within-session)
Within-session reliability of circumference measurements at the level of the leg and midline region
Time Frame: baseline (within-session)
intra and interrater reliability of circumference measurements at the level of the leg and midline region; Outcome: in cm for each of the tapeline, but a total volume can be calculated (in ml) using a truncated cone formula
baseline (within-session)
Within-session reliability of perometry at the level of the leg
Time Frame: baseline (within-session)
intra and interrater reliability of perometry at the level of the leg; Optoelectronic volumetry (or perometry): a method that makes use of an optoelectronic infrared device to detect volume differences Outcome: in ml. The height of the measurement should be noted as well.
baseline (within-session)
Within-session reliability of water displacement measurement at the level of the foot
Time Frame: baseline (within-session)
intra and interrater reliability of water displacement measurement at the level of the foot
baseline (within-session)
Within-session reliability of measurements with bio-impedance spectroscopy/analysis devices at the level of the lower limbs
Time Frame: baseline (within-session)
intra and interrater reliability of measurements with bio-impedance spectroscopy/analysis devices at the level of the lower limbs
baseline (within-session)
Within-session reliability of a questionnaire regarding skin integrity
Time Frame: baseline (within-session)
intra and interrater reliability of a questionnaire regarding skin integrity (ICC compression questionnaire) that should be completed by the therapist The ICC-CQ is the first reliable and valid questionnaire evaluating different kinds of compression and the experience by patients with lymphedema or chronic venous disease.
baseline (within-session)
Concurrent validity (only possible in case there are multiple measurement methods assessing the same lymphedema characteristic) of measurement methods for the assessment of LLL
Time Frame: baseline (within-session)
the measurement methods assessing the same edema characteristic (for example: perometry and perimetry are two different methods that both evaluate lymphedema volume or swelling), will be correlated to each other
baseline (within-session)
Clinical feasibility of measurement methods and questionnaires for the assessment of Lower lymb lymphoedema
Time Frame: baseline (within-session)
Time efficiency will be examined for each method (timed), limitations regarding clinical feasibility will be listed and scored for each method (present or absent). Finally, an overall ranking regarding feasibility score will be determined based on the reliability (best -> worse reliability) and time-efficiency (fastest -> slowest measurement method).
baseline (within-session)
Between-session reliability of pitting test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region
Time Frame: 2 weeks

The grading of edema is determined by pit depth (measured visually) and recovery time from grade 0-3. The scale is used to rate the severity and the scores are as follows:

- Grade 0: No clinical edema- Grade 1: Slight pitting (up to 2 mm depth) - Grade 2: Moderate pitting (2-5 mm) - Grade 3: Noticeably deep pit (>5 mm) A cohort of patients with LLL (n= ±40) and healthy volunteers (±40) will be scheduled for a second visit, 2 weeks later for the same clinical evaluation (as at baseline), with only 1 assessor.

2 weeks
Between-session reliability of skinfold test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region
Time Frame: 2 weeks

Skin and subcutaneous tissue is lifted between thumb and index(and, if possible, compared to the contralateral side) Outcome:If skinfold is increased; yes(1), otherwise; no(0)

A subgroup of patients with LLL (n= ±40) and healthy volunteers (±40) will be scheduled for a second visit, 2 weeks later for the same clinical evaluation (as at baseline), with only 1 assessor.

2 weeks
Between-session reliability of skin hardness test at the level of the foot, leg and midline region
Time Frame: 2 weeks

Skin is palpated with thumb and index (and, if possible, compared to the contralateral side) Outcome: If skin is hardened; yes(1), otherwise; no(0)

A subgroup of patients with LLL (n= ±40) and healthy volunteers (±40) will be scheduled for a second visit, 2 weeks later for the same clinical evaluation (as at baseline), with only 1 assessor.

2 weeks
Between-session reliability of measurement with MoistureMeterD at the level of the foot, leg and midline region
Time Frame: 2 weeks

This device can be applied to measure the percentage of water under the skin in terms of the Tissue Dielectric Constant value, making use of a probe with 300 MHz signal. Up to a depth of 2.5mm, this portable device allows measuring free and bounded water in the tissue through which the electromagnetic wave passes.

Outcome: %PWC(% Percentage Water Content)

A subgroup of patients with LLL (n= ±40) and healthy volunteers (±40) will be scheduled for a second visit, 2 weeks later for the same clinical evaluation (as at baseline), with only 1 assessor.

2 weeks
Between-session reliability of measurement with SkinFibroMeter at the level of the foot, leg and midline region
Time Frame: 2 weeks

This device is a relatively recently developed device which consists of a 1-mm-long intender and records the resistance to 50 gram of pressure by using its reference plate and related built-in force sensors. Outcome: The resistance from the skin to deformation when an external force is applied, is expressed as a number in Newton (N) and represents the induration of the skin.

A subgroup of patients with LLL (n= ±40) and healthy volunteers (±40) will be scheduled for a second visit, 2 weeks later for the same clinical evaluation (as at baseline), with only 1 assessor.

2 weeks
Between-session reliability of circumference measurements at the level of the leg and midline region
Time Frame: 2 weeks

Circumference measurements (cm) with perimeter.

A subgroup of patients with LLL (n= ±40) and healthy volunteers (±40) will be scheduled for a second visit, 2 weeks later for the same clinical evaluation (as at baseline), with only 1 assessor.

2 weeks
Between-session reliability of perometry at the level of the leg
Time Frame: 2 weeks

Optoelectronic volumetry (or perometry): a method that makes use of an optoelectronic infrared device to detect volume differences Outcome: in ml. The height of the measurement should be noted as well.

A subgroup of patients with LLL (n= ±40) and healthy volunteers (±40) will be scheduled for a second visit, 2 weeks later for the same clinical evaluation (as at baseline), with only 1 assessor.

2 weeks
Between-session reliability of water displacement measurement at the level of the foot
Time Frame: 2 weeks

'Gold standard' in which the limb is immersed into a water tank and the weight of the limb is being weighted.

A subgroup of patients with LLL (n= ±40) and healthy volunteers (±40) will be scheduled for a second visit, 2 weeks later for the same clinical evaluation (as at baseline), with only 1 assessor.

2 weeks
Between-session reliability of measurements with bio-impedance spectroscopy/analysis devices at the level of the lower limbs
Time Frame: 2 weeks

Bio-impedance spectroscopy assesses the resistance (or impedance) to the flow of an electrical current that is primarily conducted by body fluid.

A subgroup of patients with LLL (n= ±40) and healthy volunteers (±40) will be scheduled for a second visit, 2 weeks later for the same clinical evaluation (as at baseline), with only 1 assessor.

2 weeks
Between-session reliability of a questionnaire regarding skin integrity
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Between-session reliability of a questionnaire regarding skin integrity: ICC compression questionnaire that should be completed by the therapist The ICC-CQ is the first reliable and valid questionnaire evaluating different kinds of compression and the experience by patients with lymphedema or chronic venous disease
2 weeks
Between-session reliability of a self-reported disease-specific quality of life questionnaire (Lymph-ICF-LL)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The Lymph-ICF-LL is a descriptive, evaluative tool containing 28 questions about impairments in function, activity limitations, and participation restrictions in patients with lower limb lymphedema. The questionnaire has 5 domains: physical function, mental function, general tasks/household activities, mobility activities, and life domains/social life.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tessa De Vrieze, Dr., KU Leuven

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 7, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lower Limb Lymphedema

Clinical Trials on Assessor A (first measurement): measurement methods and questionnaires for the assessment of LLL

Subscribe