Acceptability of a COVID-19 Vaccine Among US Adults Over Two Time Periods

March 22, 2023 updated by: Susan Rosenthal, PhD, ABPP, Columbia University

Acceptability Across Two Time Periods of a SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Among a Representative Sample of Adults Within the United States

The overall purpose of this study is to address the factors associated with an individual's personal willingness to get the vaccine and attitudes about potential public policy approaches to implementation of a Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. Additionally, to evaluate how these attitudes change over time. The 1200 participants will be recruited by Ipsos (Ipsos KnowledgePanel®) from their nationally representative panel to participate in a survey at Time 1 and 1 year later. The information collected will include demographics, health status, household composition, experiences with COVID-19, attitudes about vaccines in general, COVID-19 vaccine specific attitudes, willingness to get a COVID-19 vaccine acceptability, and attitudes regarding COVID-19 vaccine mandates. The investigators anticipate that those who live in urban areas and who are older, have greater knowledge of COVID-19, who have known someone who was hospitalized for COVID-19, and have generally positive attitudes about vaccines will be more willing to get a vaccine. The primary reasons for willingness will be personal safety and desire to return to normal activities. The investigators also anticipate that those who vary on socio-demographics (e.g., live in urban areas, have more liberal political views), have greater knowledge of COVID-19, who have known someone who was hospitalized for COVID- 19, and have generally positive attitudes about vaccines will be more supportive of mandatory vaccination strategies. The investigators anticipate that attitudes will change over time in response to the current status of the pandemic and of available data about the vaccine's efficacy and safety.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The overall objective is to address attitudes about potential public policy approaches to implementation of a Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine and the factors associated with an individual's personal willingness to get the vaccine once available, and to assess how these attitudes change over time.

First specific aim:

1a. To describe participants' perceptions of public health strategies including mandatory vaccination requirements (e.g., travel, school attendance, work place requirements (e.g., schools, health care facilities, offices), working in a health care facility, health care providers, living in residential facilities) and targeted age groups (e.g., children, adolescents, adults, elderly).

  1. b. To determine how attitudes about strategies are related to socio-demographic characteristics (e.g., age, education, race/ethnicity, political views and political party affiliation, household structure), knowledge of SARS-CoV-2, personal experience with the infection, and other vaccine attitudes.

    Example hypothesis: Those who vary on socio-demographics (e.g., live in urban areas, have more liberal political views), have greater knowledge of SARS-CoV-2, who have known someone who was hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2, and have generally positive attitudes about vaccines will be more supportive of mandatory vaccination strategies.

    Second specific aim:

  2. a. To determine the relationship of socio-demographic characteristics (e.g., age, education, race/ethnicity, political views and political party affiliation, household structure), knowledge of SARS-CoV-2, personal experience with the infection, and other vaccine attitudes with willingness to get the vaccine.

2b. To evaluate the primary reasons driving vaccine acceptance including safety issues (personal, family, or global), desire to return to normal activities (e.g., school, work, or social events), and desire to no longer need to wear a mask.

Example hypotheses: Those who vary on socio-demographic characteristics (e.g., live in urban areas, who are older), have greater knowledge of SARS-CoV-2, who have known someone who was hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2, and have generally positive attitudes about vaccines will be more willing to get a vaccine. The primary reasons for willingness will be personal safety and desire to return to normal activities.

Third specific aim: This specific aim focuses on how the findings from aim 1 and aim 2 change over time.

3a. To evaluate how national level perceptions of public health strategies (aim 1) and an individual's personal willingness to get the vaccine (aim 2) change over time.

Given the unknown trajectory, there are several possible scenarios. For example, if nationally there is a decrease in new infections with lifting of the restrictions then the investigators hypothesize that there will be an overall decrease in support for mandatory strategies and in willingness to accept the vaccine. Alternatively, if new infections are rising and restrictions are in place, then there will be an overall increase in acceptability. The investigators are also prepared to adapt our surveys should one or more vaccines become licensed and available prior to the time 1 or time 2 survey.

3b. The investigators will explore whether changes in perceptions of public health strategies (aim 1) and an individual's personal willingness to get the vaccine (aim 2) vary based on relevant socio-demographic characteristics (e.g., region of the country, political views and political party affiliation, household structure, race/ethnicity) and, when appropriate, changes within those characteristics (e.g., when rates of infections are changing differentially across regions). The investigators also will explore whether changes in perceptions of public health strategies (aim 1) and an individual's personal willingness to get the vaccine (aim 2) vary based on perceptions of societal events. For example, the investigators will evaluate if changes in vaccine attitudes are associated with regional differences in whether cases are increasing or decreasing; changes in household structure (e.g., the presence of elders in the home); or perceptions of media reports.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1208

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Irving Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults 18 years of age and older, who live in the US and who have been recruited to be members of Ipsos (KnowledgePanel) survey research panel.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age and older
  • Able to read English and Spanish
  • Panelists with Ipsos (KnowledgePanel)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 17 years of age and younger
  • Not able to read English or Spanish
  • Not a member of Ipsos (KnowledgePanel)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Adults from the United States
Adult participants 18 years of age or older who are panelists recruited and maintained by Ipsos (KnoweledgePanel). All participants live within the United States.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vaccination or intention to get vaccinated for COVID-19
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 year
Participants vaccination status or intent to get vaccinated for COVID-19 will be measured via survey items.
Baseline, 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Attitudes toward mandates for COVID-19 vaccines
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 year
Participants self report of attitudes on survey
Baseline, 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Susan L Rosenthal, PhD, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 7, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 22, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 18, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Covid19

Subscribe