Use of Rhythmic Auditory Cueing During Bilateral Training of the Upper Extremities in Stroke Patients

The purpose of the study is to determine the effect of rhythmic auditory cueing with bilateral arm training on upper limb functions in stroke patients.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Hemiplegia, Spastic
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Rhythmic Auditory Cueing; Other: Bilateral arm training; Other: Conventional physical therapy program

Detailed Description

Arm and hand movement problems are major contributors to disability in patients after stroke. In fact, only 5% of adults regain full arm function after stroke, and 20% regain no functional use. Hence, alternative strategies are needed to reduce the long-term disability and functional impairment from upper limb hemiparesis.

To solve problems concerning upper limb dysfunction related to stroke, various treatment methods have been used in several previous studies. Rhythmic auditory stimulation has been reported as an effective intervention for improving movement in the affected extremities of stroke patients.

To the best of our knowledge, no mentioned previous studies evaluating the effect of rhythmic auditory cueing with bilateral arm training using functional exercises on upper extremity impairment in patients with stroke in Egypt are reported. So, this study aims to determine the effect of rhythmic auditory cueing with bilateral arm training on upper limb functions in patients with stroke.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 30
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Egypt
  • Dokki, Egypt
    • Outpatient clinic - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 45 years to 60 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Thirty patients with ischemic stroke from both sexes will be included.
2. Patients will have stroke for the first time.
3. The age of patients will range from 45 to 60 years.
4. Duration of illness will be from six months to eighteen months.
5. The degree of spasticity will ranged from 1 to 1 + grade according to the modified Ashworth scale.
6. Patients will have moderate arm motor impairment (between 30 and 49 scores) according to Fugl-Meyer (FM) arm section scale.
7. The affected upper extremity will be the dominant side.
8. Patients will be able to sit and maintain balance in a sitting position.

Exclusion Criteria:

• The patients will be excluded if they have:

  1. Visual or auditory deficits.
  2. Perceptual disorders.
  3. Any surgical interventions in the upper extremities limiting the range of motion.
  4. Aphasia or apraxia.
  5. Musculoskeletal or neurological impairment of the unaffected upper extremity.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Rhythmic Auditory Cueing; Group (B): Patients in this group will receive the same designed physical therapy program given to the control group in addition to auditory cueing during bilateral arm training using the metronome.	Other: Rhythmic Auditory Cueing; Patients will perform the same movement sequence in time with the metronome beat. The frequency of the rhythmic auditory stimulation will be matched to the participant"s preferred movement speed, which will be assessed prior to the start of the trial, and participants typically started moving after they had heard the metronome beat two to three times. Participants will be given sufficient practice trials to ensure full understanding before the actual recording of data, and will be given 3-minutes break between trials. On the 3rd and 5th week, the rhythm frequency was increased by 5%.; Other: Bilateral arm training; Training will consist of 20 minutes of bilateral arm training In each session, patients will be seated comfortably at a table in the following limb positions: ankles in neutral dorsiflexion, knees and hips placed at 90°, shoulders in 0° flexion, elbows in 60° flexion, and wrists in neutral position of flexion/extension; Other: Conventional physical therapy program; Scapular mobilization. Thoracic spine mobilization. Mechanical assisted (active and passive) exercises. Therapeutic positioning as weight bearing on the paretic arm. Opening and closing closed fist. Strengthening exercise. Stretching of spastic muscles.
Active Comparator: Bilateral arm training; Patients in this group will receive a standard physical therapy program in addition to Bilateral arm training.	Other: Bilateral arm training; Training will consist of 20 minutes of bilateral arm training In each session, patients will be seated comfortably at a table in the following limb positions: ankles in neutral dorsiflexion, knees and hips placed at 90°, shoulders in 0° flexion, elbows in 60° flexion, and wrists in neutral position of flexion/extension; Other: Conventional physical therapy program; Scapular mobilization. Thoracic spine mobilization. Mechanical assisted (active and passive) exercises. Therapeutic positioning as weight bearing on the paretic arm. Opening and closing closed fist. Strengthening exercise. Stretching of spastic muscles.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Assessing the change in Upper Extremity Motor Performance	Assessment via using Upper Extremity Motor Performance scale. This scale has been shown to be valid and reliable, and it correlates well with inter joint upper extremity coordination. It has a maximum score of 66	Baseline and 6 weeks post-intervention
Assessing the change in upper limb Motor Function	Assessment via using Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) The final time score will be the median time required for all timed tasks executed. One hundred twenty seconds is the maximum time allowed for each task attempted Timing is carried out using a stopwatch.	Baseline and 6 weeks post-intervention
Assessing the change in gross manual dexterity	Assessment via using Box and Block Test Involves moving 1-inch cube blocks from a rectangular box container to another container, and the number of blocks moved by each hand in 60 seconds is determined using stop watch	Baseline and 6 weeks post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Cairo University
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Reem Abdelhady, Cairo University

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): January 1, 2021
• Primary Completion (Actual): May 30, 2021
• Study Completion (Actual): June 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: June 17, 2021
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 17, 2021
• First Posted (Actual): June 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): June 25, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 17, 2021
• Last Verified: June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Nervous System Diseases; Neurologic Manifestations; Paralysis; Hemiplegia
• Other Study ID Numbers: Reem_MSc

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No