Ecological Momentary Music Intervention for the Reduction of Stress

March 2, 2023 updated by: Urs Nater, University of Vienna

An Ecological Momentary Music Intervention for the Reduction of Stress in the Daily Life of Turkish Immigrant Women

Ethnic discrimination is a prevalent problem in the European Union and other regions. In view of the significant negative impacts of discrimination on mental and physical health, it is of high relevance to counteract these negative effects and provide appropriate interventions. This study aims to investigate the feasibility and the effectiveness of a mobile-based intervention, delivering self-selected relaxing music to buffer biological (salivary cortisol, salivary alpha-amylase) and psychological (perceived stress, perceived ethnic discrimination) stress reactions in moments of acute stress and perceived ethnic discrimination in the everyday life of Turkish immigrant women (N=20, age range 18-65 years). An intra-individually randomized design will be used, i.e., participants will be instructed on a random basis to either listen to music (intervention event) or not (control event). The whole study period consists of 35 days with a baseline period (week 1), intervention period (week 2-4), and post period (week 5). To investigate the feasibility of the intervention, post-monitoring interviews will be conducted after the end of the whole study period.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The experience of unfair treatment because of one's own ethnicity, i.e., ethnic discrimination, constitutes a complex stressor which triggers both physical and psychological stress reactions. In this regard, women may constitute a particularly vulnerable group, as they may be confronted with intersectional stigmata, i.e., both ethnicity-related and gender-related stigmata. Considering the resulting health impairments many people with migration background are confronted with, it is of great importance to provide interventions with the potential to minimize those negative consequences. Recognizing this necessity, an ecological momentary music intervention was developed in order to reduce psychological and biological (cortisol, alpha-amylase) stress levels due to perceived ethnic discrimination in everyday life. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility and the effectiveness of this mobile-based intervention.

It is hypothesized that listening to music after an event of acute stress and/or ethnic discrimination will result in stronger decreases in psychological (perceived stress, perceived ethnic discrimination), and biological (cortisol, alpha-amylase) stress levels compared to no music listening in everyday life (immediate effect). Further, it is expected that a decrease in diurnal psychological and biological stress levels will be observed throughout the study period (intermediate effect) and that participants will start to consume or increase their deliberate consumption of music after an event of acute stress and/or ethnic discrimination in their everyday life after the intervention (behavior change). In addition, it is hypothesized that the feasibility of the intervention will be confirmed by participants' self-reports of high usefulness of and satisfaction with the intervention as well as by a high usage rate.

The study design is as follows: Baseline period (week 1), intervention period (week 2 to 4), post period (week 5).

During the baseline and post period, psychological and biological stress fluctuations and perceived ethnic discrimination in daily life will be assessed. To this end, participants will be signaled three times a day (9:00 am, 2:00 pm, 7:00 pm) in order to answer questions on their momentary levels of stress, perceived discrimination, positive and negative affect, and their music-listening activities (time-contingent data entries). Additionally, whenever a stressful or discriminatory event occurs, participants are instructed to initiate a data entry by themselves in order to report their momentary levels of stress, perceived discrimination, positive and negative affect, and to answer questions on the current situation. To investigate activities after such self-initiated, event-contingent data entries, the app will signal the participants 20 (post 1) and 35 minutes (post 2) later for an additional data entry. As part of every time-contingent and event-contingent report, participants will provide a saliva sample in order to examine biological stress markers: salivary cortisol levels as index of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA axis) activity, salivary alpha-amylase as index of autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity.

A daily diary assessment will be conducted every evening at the same time. In this diary, participants will be asked about their current perceived stress, perceived discrimination, positive and negative affect, fatigue, coping strategies. Additionally, they will be asked whether discriminatory events had happened over the course of the day and if so, to describe the event(s). For this data entry, no saliva sample will be collected.

During the Intervention period (week 2 to 4), the sampling protocol will be the same as in baseline and post period (i.e., time-contingent data entries, daily diary assessment, self-initiated event-contingent data entries, post 1, post 2). Additionally, after every self-initiated event-contingent report, participants will be randomly assigned (50:50) to either the intervention event (listening to music for 20 minutes) or the control event (no music listening, continue the activity before the data entry). This approach constitutes an intra-individually randomized design.

To investigate the feasibility of the intervention, qualitative data from post-monitoring interviews will be gathered at the end of the study period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria, 1010
        • University of Vienna

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Turkish immigrants (1st or 2nd generation)
  • Weekly ethnic discrimination (at least 2 discriminatory events per week; value of or above 104 on the Everyday Discrimination Scale)
  • 18-65 years
  • Sex: female

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Insufficient proficiency of the German language
  • Body mass index (BMI) above 30 kg/m2
  • Mental disorders (i.e., current major depressive episode, lifetime psychosis or bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, eating disorder in the past 5 years, substance-induced disorder in the past 2 years)
  • Chronic somatic diseases
  • Medical conditions or medications known to affect endocrine or autonomic functioning
  • Abuse of alcohol in the past 6 months
  • Drug use in the past year, cannabis use in the past 14 days
  • Pregnancy
  • Breastfeeding
  • Impaired hearing or absolute pitch

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Music listening vs. No music listening
Random assignment (50:50) of every participant to one of the following two conditions: Music listening after a stressful/discriminatory event (i.e., intervention condition) or no music listening after a stressful/discriminatory event (i.e., control condition).
20 minutes music listening

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participants' self-reports on the integrability of the study into the daily life
Time Frame: after 5 weeks
6 open-ended questions of semi-structured interviews on the integrability of the study into the daily life of the participants
after 5 weeks
Participants' self-reports on the perceived effectiveness of the intervention
Time Frame: after 5 weeks
5 open-ended questions of semi-structured interviews on the perceived effectiveness of the intervention
after 5 weeks
Perceived burden regarding the intervention
Time Frame: after 5 weeks
10 items of a self-developed questionnaire on perceived burden regarding the intervention (5-point Likert Scales, higher scores indicate greater levels of perceived burden)
after 5 weeks
Satisfaction with the intervention
Time Frame: after 5 weeks

Combination of the following 10 items to measure participants' satisfaction with the intervention:

  • 6 items of a self-developed questionnaire on satisfaction with the intervention (5-point Likert Scales, higher scores indicate greater levels of satisfaction)
  • adaption of 4 items of a self-developed satisfaction questionnaire (Loo Gee, 2018; 5-point Likert Scales, higher scores indicated greater levels of satisfaction)
after 5 weeks
Usage Rate of the App
Time Frame: Across the 5-week study period
Timestamped log-data of the app to determine usage rate by the participants (higher usage rate indicates a greater feasibility of the intervention)
Across the 5-week study period
Change in Subjective Stress Experience
Time Frame: from baseline period (week 1) to post period (week 5); during the course of the intervention: T0: directly after a stressful/discriminatory event, T1: after 20 minutes music listening/ not music listening; T2: 15 minutes after T1
Momentary stress level: visual analogue scales (VAS; 0-100, higher scores indicate a greater level of momentary stress)
from baseline period (week 1) to post period (week 5); during the course of the intervention: T0: directly after a stressful/discriminatory event, T1: after 20 minutes music listening/ not music listening; T2: 15 minutes after T1
Change in Short-Term Neuroendocrine Stress: Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis
Time Frame: from baseline period (week 1) to post period (week 5); during the course of the intervention: T0: directly after a stressful/discriminatory event, T1: after 20 minutes music listening/ not music listening; T2: 15 minutes after T1
Biological Marker: Salivary Cortisol
from baseline period (week 1) to post period (week 5); during the course of the intervention: T0: directly after a stressful/discriminatory event, T1: after 20 minutes music listening/ not music listening; T2: 15 minutes after T1
Change in Short-Term Neuroendocrine Stress: Autonomic Nervous System
Time Frame: from baseline period (week 1) to post period (week 5); during the course of the intervention: T0: directly after a stressful/discriminatory event, T1: after 20 minutes music listening/ not music listening; T2: 15 minutes after T1
Biological Marker: Salivary Alpha-Amylase
from baseline period (week 1) to post period (week 5); during the course of the intervention: T0: directly after a stressful/discriminatory event, T1: after 20 minutes music listening/ not music listening; T2: 15 minutes after T1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in participants' behavior regarding music listening
Time Frame: change from baseline period (week 1) to post period (week 5)
Occurrence of music listening after a stressful/discriminatory event (greater occurrence of music-listening indicates a better outcome)
change from baseline period (week 1) to post period (week 5)
Change in positive and negative affect
Time Frame: every evening in the daily diary assessment for 35 days
PANAS (Positive Affect Negative Affect Scale) is a self-report questionnaire that consists of two scales to measure positive affect and negative affect, each scale consists of 10 items (5-point Likert Scales, for every scale higher scores indicate greater positive/negative affect)
every evening in the daily diary assessment for 35 days
Change in fatigue
Time Frame: every evening in the daily diary assessment for 35 days
5 items (one of each scale) of the MFI (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory), a self-report questionnaire consisting of 20 items that are assigned to 5 scales: general fatigue, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced activity, and reduced motivation (5-point Likert Scales, higher scores on each subscale indicate greater levels of each subscale-specific type of fatigue)
every evening in the daily diary assessment for 35 days
Change in coping behavior
Time Frame: every evening in the daily diary assessment for 35 days
5 items of the Brief-COPE (Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced), a self-report questionnaire that consists of 28 items to measure effective and ineffective ways of coping with stressful life events; one item of each subscale: active coping, use of emotional support, use of instrumental support, venting, religion; 5-point Likert-Scales with higher scores for each subscale indicating a greater level of the subscale-specific coping behavior)
every evening in the daily diary assessment for 35 days
Change in avoidance behavior regarding discriminatory events
Time Frame: every evening in the daily diary assessment for 35 days

Combination of the following 4 items to measure change in avoidance behavior:

  • 3 items of the avoidance subscale of the CSI (Coping Strategy Indicator), a self-report questionnaire of situational coping that consists of 33 items with the subscales avoidance, problem solving, and seeking social support (5-point Likert-Scales with higher scores indicating greater levels of avoidance behavior)
  • one self-developed item to measure avoidance behavior, in particular the item measures if the person avoided situations and/or persons for fear of being discriminated against (5-point Likert-Scales with higher scores indicating greater levels of avoidance behavior)
every evening in the daily diary assessment for 35 days
Change in anticipation of discriminatory events
Time Frame: every evening in the daily diary assessment for 35 days
3 items of the Racism-related Vigilance Scale, a 6-item scale to measure heightened vigilance regarding discriminatory events (5-point Likert-Scales with higher scores indicating greater levels of anticipation of discriminatory events)
every evening in the daily diary assessment for 35 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ricarda Nater-Mewes, Dr. Dr., University of Vienna

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 28, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 24, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 24, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress, Psychological

Clinical Trials on self-selected relaxing music

Subscribe