Evaluation of Safety and Dosing of a Vitamin C Bundle for Sepsis Treatment in Africa (REVISTA-DOSE)

September 6, 2021 updated by: Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine

Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Feasibility for Administration of Two Doses of Intravenous Vitamin C Combined With Vitamin B1 for the Management of Adult Patients Admitted With Sepsis to Kiruddu National Referral Hospital

Open-label phase 2a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) assessing the pharmacokinetics of two different doses of intravenous vitamin C given alongside vitamin B1 in adult medical patients with sepsis and hypotension.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Sepsis is a life-threatening infection which, due to a dysregulated host response to infection, is responsible for more than 11 million deaths annually, a large percentage of which occur in sub-Saharan Africa (sSA). Emerging research shows promising benefits in treating sepsis patients with "metabolic resuscitation" using combinations of hydrocortisone, intravenous (IV) ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and IV thiamine (vitamin B1), alone or in combination. Studies are currently underway in the USA, Europe, Asia, and South America to understand whether combinations of these medicines or the medicines individually can improve outcomes for patients with sepsis. Although none of these studies are being conducted in sSA, the medicines comprising these metabolic 'bundles' are inexpensive, readily available and relatively safe to administer. It is critical that similar studies are conducted in sSA to evaluate whether or not these inexpensive medicines (or a combination of them) are efficacious for improved survival among patients with sepsis. If these studies prove that these medicines can improve survival from sepsis, there is a large potential to save many lives. Through the Preparation for Randomised Evaluation of a VItamin C bundle for Sepsis Treatment in Africa (REVISTA-Prep) studies, the investigators intend to conduct preliminary research in Uganda to help define parameters for a future RCT aimed at identifying the optimal vitamin C and vitamin B1 combination for improving survival from sepsis among adults in sSA, where resources are constrained, intensive care units are rare and issues like poverty, malnutrition and HIV are common. The study described in this protocol (i.e., REVISTA-DOSE) aims to establish the optimal vitamin C dosing strategy for the future REVISTA-RCT (assessing the efficacy of variations of a treatment bundle comprising vitamin C/B1 and/or hydrocortisone for reducing mortality among adult patients with sepsis in Africa).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Kampala, Uganda
        • Recruiting
        • Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University
        • Contact:
          • Christine Sekaggya-Wiltshire, MMed PhD
          • Phone Number: +256772479791
          • Email: csekaggya@idi.co.ug
      • Kampala, Uganda
        • Recruiting
        • Kiruddu National referral Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christine Sekaggya, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult (≥18 years old) patients presenting to the emergency department of Kiruddu National Referral Hospital (KNRH) with:

    • suspected infection [(any of): temperature >38 degrees Celsius or <36 degrees Celsius or (in the past seven days) fevers, rigors, night sweats or antibiotic use]; AND
    • systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mmHg
  2. Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the subject (or a legal representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study.
  3. Subjects who are willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests and other study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant or known active breast feeding
  2. Non-severe, localized, uncomplicated infection (e.g., cellulitis with only local symptoms) which is apparent on clinical examination
  3. Severe bleeding or hemorrhagic shock
  4. Hypotension likely secondary to a cause other than sepsis or sepsis-induced cardiac insufficiency
  5. Detainee or prisoner
  6. Admission to a surgical or obstetric/gynecological ward
  7. Emergency surgery required
  8. Previously recruited to the REVISTA-DOSE study
  9. History of end stage renal disease requiring dialysis
  10. Current symptomatic renal stones or or a previous diagnosis of primary hyperoxaluria or oxalate nephropathy
  11. History of allergic reactions to vitamin C or vitamin B1
  12. Use of vitamin C at a dose greater than 1 g (oral or intravenous) within 24 hours of screening
  13. Chronic disease/illness that, in the opinion of the site investigator, has a lifespan of less than 30 days unrelated to current sepsis diagnosis (e.g., advanced malignancy or neurodegenerative disease).
  14. Previous or current enrolment in a trial in which co-enrolment is not allowed

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Usual Care
Usual care
Experimental: Intravenous vitamin C 1.5g + intravenous vitamin B1
intravenous vitamin C (1.5 grams) every 6 hours for 16 doses in combination with intravenous vitamin B1 (200 mg) every 12 hours
Vitamin C (ascor), infused intravenously in 50 mls sodium chloride (NaCl) over 30 minutes every 6 hours for 16 doses
Other Names:
  • Ascorbate
  • Ascor
Vitamin B1 (200 mg) administered intravenously every 12 hours for 8 doses
Other Names:
  • Thiamine
  • Thiamin
Experimental: Intravenous Vitamin C 3g + intravenous vitamin B1
Intravenous vitamin C (3 grams) every 6 hours for 16 doses in combination with intravenous vitamin B1 (200 mg) every 12 hours
Vitamin C (ascor), infused intravenously in 50 mls sodium chloride (NaCl) over 30 minutes every 6 hours for 16 doses
Other Names:
  • Ascorbate
  • Ascor
Vitamin B1 (200 mg) administered intravenously every 12 hours for 8 doses
Other Names:
  • Thiamine
  • Thiamin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in Vitamin C plasma concentration during the intervention period
Time Frame: during the intervention (days 1-5)
Vitamin C plasma concentrations will be measured during the intervention period using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet (UV) analysis and compared to baseline (pre-intervention) concentrations
during the intervention (days 1-5)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oxalate excretion in urine
Time Frame: during the intervention (hours 0-12 and 72-84)
Urine oxalate levels will be measured through two separate 12 hour urine collections.
during the intervention (hours 0-12 and 72-84)
Incidence of acute hemolysis
Time Frame: during the intervention (days 0-5)

Acute hemolysis is defined as:

  1. hemoglobin drop of at least 2.5 g/dl within 24 hours of a study drug; OR
  2. reticulocyte count >2 times upper limit of normal at clinical site lab; AND
  3. at least two of the following:

i. haptoglobin < lower limit of normal; ii. indirect (unconjugated) bilirubin >2 times upper limit of normal; iii. lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) >2 times upper limit of normal

during the intervention (days 0-5)
Enrolment rates
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Enrolment rates of patients with sepsis and hypotension
up to 3 months
Rates of adherence to protocol
Time Frame: during the intervention
Rates of adherence to protocol for treatment, clinical measurements and follow up
during the intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in lactate level
Time Frame: during the intervention (hours 0, 6 and 24)
A correlate for hypoperfusion (or shock)
during the intervention (hours 0, 6 and 24)
Pro-calcitonin clearance (PCT-c)
Time Frame: during the intervention (hours 0, 24 and 72)
Increasing procalcitonin levels may be an indicator of increased severity of bacterial infection or sepsis. PCT-c calculated using the following formula: initial PCT minus PCT at 0 and 24 and 72 hours, divided by the initial PCT multiplied by 100.
during the intervention (hours 0, 24 and 72)
Duration of hypotension assessed by systolic and mean arterial pressures during 4-day administration of vitamin C (in combination with vitamin B1)
Time Frame: during the intervention (hours 0-96)
Lower blood pressures are associated with worsening shock and poor organ perfusion. Non invasive blood pressure readings will be recorded.
during the intervention (hours 0-96)
Change in quick sepsis related organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score
Time Frame: during the intervention (hours 0, 6, 24, 48, 72 and 96)
qSOFA score is a 3 point measurement of sepsis severity made up of systolic blood pressure under 100 mmHg, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score <15 and respiratory rate >22. Scores increase with severity from 0-3.
during the intervention (hours 0, 6, 24, 48, 72 and 96)
Change in Universal Vital Assessment (UVA) score
Time Frame: during the intervention (hours 0, 6, 24, 48, 72 and 96)
The UVA score includes points for temperature, heart and respiratory rates, systolic blood pressure, oxygen saturation, GCS score and HIV serostatus. Patients are scored from zero to 13 with increasing severity
during the intervention (hours 0, 6, 24, 48, 72 and 96)
Change in Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS)
Time Frame: during the intervention (hours 0, 6, 24, 48, 72 and 96)
MEWS is a physiologic scoring system for bedside assessment of patients. Patients are scored from 0-14 with increasing severity according to systolic blood pressure, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), temperature and the 'alert, verbal, pain, unresponsive' (AVPU) score
during the intervention (hours 0, 6, 24, 48, 72 and 96)
Percentage of patients able to walk independently
Time Frame: before, during and after the intervention (days 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 28)
Walking independently is defined by being able to stand independently and walk at least 10 steps without assistance
before, during and after the intervention (days 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 28)
Change in creatinine levels
Time Frame: before, during and after the intervention (days 0, 1, 3 and 28)
measure of kidney function comparing baseline to measurement during and after the intervention
before, during and after the intervention (days 0, 1, 3 and 28)
mortality at 28 days
Time Frame: after the intervention (day 28)
Number of participants alive 28 days after enrolment
after the intervention (day 28)
in-hospital mortality
Time Frame: after the intervention (day 7 or at the time of hospital discharge)
Number of participants alive at hospital discharge (or day 7 if still an inpatient)
after the intervention (day 7 or at the time of hospital discharge)
mortality at 28 days among vitamin B1 deficient participants
Time Frame: after the intervention (day 28)
Number of vitamin B1 deficient participants alive 28 days after enrolment
after the intervention (day 28)
in-hospital mortality among vitamin B1 deficient participants
Time Frame: after the intervention (day 7 or at the time of hospital discharge)
Number of vitamin B1 deficient participants alive at hospital discharge (or day 7 if still an inpatient)
after the intervention (day 7 or at the time of hospital discharge)
number of oxygen-free days
Time Frame: during the intervention (days 1-5)
number of days of hospitalization during which the participant does not require supplemental oxygen for hypoxia and/or respiratory distress
during the intervention (days 1-5)
length of hospitalization
Time Frame: during the intervention (days 1-5)
number of days hospitalized
during the intervention (days 1-5)
number of hospital-free days
Time Frame: during and after the intervention (days 1-28)
taken from 28 days; deceased patients will be assigned a score of 0 for all "free day" outcomes
during and after the intervention (days 1-28)
Frequency of re-admission to hospital
Time Frame: after the intervention (day 28)
Number of re-hospitalizations after discharge from initial hospitalization for sepsis
after the intervention (day 28)
change in Vitamin C plasma concentration at day 28
Time Frame: after the intervention (day 28)
Vitamin C plasma concentrations will be measured after the intervention period (at 28 days post enrolment) using HPLC with UV analysis and compared to baseline (pre-intervention) concentrations
after the intervention (day 28)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shevin T Jacob, MD MPH, LSTM/IDI/Walimu

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 29, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 29, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe