Study to Compare the Use of a Behavioral Health App Versus Care As Usual for 16-22 Year Olds with Depression

October 17, 2024 updated by: Eva Szigethy, University of Pittsburgh

Randomized Control Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Digital Mental Health Intervention Embedded in Routine Care Compared to Treatment As Usual in Adolescents and Young Adults with Moderate Depressive Symptoms

Randomized Controlled Trial comparing a coach-enhanced digital cognitive behavioral intervention (d-CBI) (RxWell) + treatment as usual (TAU) versus TAU alone for moderate depression as determined by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) threshold as part of routine pediatric care.

The study will be completed in pediatric practices with embedded behavioral therapists across 3 institutions (Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Boston Children's Hospital, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

After consent, participants will be further screened to determine eligibility. They will complete a brief Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM5) (SCID). If someone has been hospitalized in the past 3 months for dangerousness, or is diagnosed with severe current psychiatric disorders based on SCID V (Clinical Trials Version) for bipolar disorder, current substance misuse or dependence, or thought disorder they will not be eligible for this study and will be referred back to the clinician for further support.

PARTICIPANT PROCEDURES:

All participants who are eligible for this study, consent to participate, and are randomized to one of the two arms (dCBI+TAU or TAU) will be asked to complete self-report and blinded clinician administered measures on three occasions over 12 weeks (baseline, 6-, and 12-week time points). At enrollment and prior to randomization, each participant will be assigned a unique Study ID that will be used to code all data collected for research purposes.

Participants will be asked to complete self-report assessments via 1) self-administered completion of assessments through REDCap Cloud (i.e., online); 2) over the phone with a member of the Research Team who will enter the participant's responses into a secure web-based portal (REDCap Cloud).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

185

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92123
        • Rady Children's Hospital - San Diego
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Boston Children's Hospital
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 22 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 16-22 inclusive recruited from outpatient pediatric clinic visit.
  • Meeting positive screen criteria depression by PHQ-9 criteria (score greater than or equal to10).
  • English-speaking (participant)
  • Smart phone access

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Extremely severe depression (PHQ-9 greater than 24; or active suicidal plan).
  • Current dangerousness (based on Treatment for Adolescents for Depression Study (TADS) study criteria, 2004). Hospitalized for dangerousness within 3 months; Suicide attempt requiring medical attention within 3 months.
  • Severe, current psychiatric disorders based on SCID V (Clinical Trials Version) for bipolar disorder, current substance misuse or dependence, thought disorder. Research coordinators who are trained to fidelity threshold will complete this measure with the patient.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Treatment as Usual (TAU)
Participants who are randomly assigned to the Treatment as Usual (TAU) group will receive standard care, which will consist of a tiered stepped care model of behavioral therapy offered by the embedded behavioral therapist at each practice as part of routine care, with the provision of augmentation of therapy (or addition of an antidepressant) at the discretion of the clinical team. Psychotropic medications at baseline and previous behavioral treatment will be recorded at baseline. Number of therapy sessions, delivery modality (face to face versus telemedicine), and addition of antidepressant or other psychotropic medication or dose change will be monitored and recorded over the study period.
Participants who are randomly assigned to the Treatment as Usual (TAU) group will receive standard care, which will consist of a tiered stepped care model of behavioral therapy offered by the embedded behavioral therapist at each practice as part of routine care, with the provision of augmentation of therapy (or addition of an antidepressant) at the discretion of the clinical team. Psychotropic medications at baseline and previous behavioral treatment will be recorded at baseline. Number of therapy sessions, delivery modality (face to face versus telemedicine), and addition of antidepressant or other psychotropic medication or dose change will be monitored and recorded over the study period.
Experimental: dCBI + Treatment as Usual
Participants randomly assigned to the intervention group (dCBI+TAU) will receive standard care and also gain access to the dCBI. The dCBI, RxWell, is a trans-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) mobile app product addressing depression and anxiety that was developed based on standard CBT techniques.
Participants who are randomly assigned to the Treatment as Usual (TAU) group will receive standard care, which will consist of a tiered stepped care model of behavioral therapy offered by the embedded behavioral therapist at each practice as part of routine care, with the provision of augmentation of therapy (or addition of an antidepressant) at the discretion of the clinical team. Psychotropic medications at baseline and previous behavioral treatment will be recorded at baseline. Number of therapy sessions, delivery modality (face to face versus telemedicine), and addition of antidepressant or other psychotropic medication or dose change will be monitored and recorded over the study period.
The dCBI, RxWell, is a trans-CBT mobile app product addressing depression and anxiety that was developed based on standard CBT techniques. RxWell provides users users with 40 brief (5-10 minute) skill building techniques for anxiety and depression. Users will have access to a goal-setting tab and "in the moment relief" section which contains over 17 techniques,14 of which are brief audios to help users engage relaxation responses. The user will be provided with the depression path, which has 40 unique techniques, and if the user expresses significant anxiety, the coach will have the ability to personalize the program by pulling in any of the 53 techniques from the anxiety path, so that the individual can utilize the proper CBT techniques that fit with their presentation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in depression severity
Time Frame: 12 weeks

Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) will be administered by a blinded rater from baseline up to 12 weeks after baseline to evaluate the change in depression severity.

The CDRS-R is a 17-item interview, which score can add up to between 17 and 113. A score of greater than or equal to 40 indicates depressive symptomatology, and a score of less than or equal to indicates remission.

12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in depression severity; evidence of passive suicidal ideation
Time Frame: 12 weeks

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) will be utilized to measure change in depression severity and evidence of passive suicidal ideation from baseline up to 12 weeks after baseline.

The PHQ-9 is a 9 item questionnaire. Scores can range from 0-27. A score of 0-4 indicates no depressive symptoms; 5-9 indicates mild depressive symptoms; 10-19 indicates moderate depressive symptoms; 20-27 indicates severe depressive symptoms.

12 weeks
Change in anxiety severity
Time Frame: 12 weeks

Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD7) will be utilized to measure change in anxiety severity from baseline up to 12 weeks after baseline.

GAD-7 is a 7 item questionnaire. Scores range from 7-21. Total scores of 0-4 indicates no anxiety; 5-9 mild anxiety; 10-14 moderate anxiety; greater than or equal to 15 indicates severe anxiety.

12 weeks
Change in quality of life
Time Frame: 12 weeks

Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) will be utilized to measure change in quality of life from baseline up to 12 weeks after baseline.

SWLS is a five item measure with a maximum score of 35. Higher score correlate with higher satisfaction of life. Scores 31-35 extremely satisfied. Scores less than 9 indicate extremely dissatisfied.

12 weeks
Change in general level of functioning
Time Frame: 12 weeks

Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) blinded clinician rater will be utilized to measure the level of general functioning from baseline up to 12 weeks after baseline.

CGAS scores range from 1-100 with 100-91 associated with superior functioning and 31-40 with major impairment in functioning in several areas, and unable to function in one of those areas.

12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eva Szigethy, University of Pittsburgh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual Participant Data will not be shared. Data is shared at the aggregate level.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Treatment as Usual

Subscribe