Online Field Test of an Appendicitis Decision Support Tool

January 20, 2022 updated by: David Flum, University of Washington
After the recent publication of the CODA Trial comparing antibiotics and surgery for acute appendicitis, the investigators developed a comprehensive decision support tool. This tool will help patients understand the risks and benefits of each treatment and make a treatment decision. This study is an online randomized field test comparing the decision support tool to a control infographic and assessing it's affect on decisional outcomes, such as decisional conflict.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

194

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
        • University of Washington

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria: who live in the United States and who have not previously had appendicitis.

  • Workers on Amazons Mechanical Turk Platform with an approval rating of 95% or higher
  • Workers on Amazons Mechanical Turk Platform who live in the United States
  • Workers on Amazons Mechanical Turn Platform who have not previously had appendicitis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Employees or relatives of employees of the University of Washington

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Decision Support Tool
In this arm study participants saw a decision support tool consisting of a video and a interactive decision aid (www.appyornot.org).
Viewing of a decision support tool.
Active Comparator: Infographic
Participant saw a static infographic providing information about the two treatments for appendicitis.
Viewing of a standardized infographic

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decisional Conflict Pre vs. Post Intervention
Time Frame: At time of enrollment
Assessed using the validated decisional conflict scale comparing only participants in the intervention arm before and after viewing the decision support tool.
At time of enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decisional Conflict Between Arms
Time Frame: At time of enrollment
Total score on the validated decisional conflict scale after viewing the intervention support tool or the control infographic. Scale ranges from 0-100 with higher scores being worse.
At time of enrollment
Acceptability
Time Frame: At time of enrollment
Between arm comparison of the acceptability of the information presented to the participants rated on a 4 point acceptability scale with higher scores representing higher acceptability.
At time of enrollment
Trust and Accuracy of Information
Time Frame: At time of enrollment
Participants perception of the trustworthiness and accuracy of the information presented to them on a 5 point scale with higher scores representing a higher perceived trustworthiness and perceived accuracy.
At time of enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: David R Flum, MD, MPH, University of Washington

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 6, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 6, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 6, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Appendicitis Acute

Clinical Trials on Appendicitis Decision Support Tool

3
Subscribe