Six-month Performance of Meniscal Wall Infiltration Under Ultrasound to Treat Stable Degenerative Meniscal Injuries. (ECHOGUIDE)

Evaluation of the Performance of Six-month Wall Infiltration Under Ultrasound to Treat Stable Degenerative Meniscal Injuries. A Single-center, Randomized, Double-blind Study.

The main hypothesis of the study is that in situ infiltration of the meniscal lesion would provide patients with lasting and greater relief than intra-articular infiltration. A statistically significant difference would be if the Lysholm score of the meniscal wall group at 3 months is 9.5 points higher than that of the intra-articular infiltration group.

The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of meniscal wall infiltration under ultrasound in the treatment of stable degenerative meniscal lesions versus intra-articular infiltration (Gold standard) at 3 months by Lysholm's algo-functional score.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nîmes, France, 30029
        • CHU Nîmes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a symptomatic meniscal lesion of a degenerative nature, isolated or associated with early osteoarthritis or chondropathy (Ahlbach stages 1 and 2).
  • Indication for peri-meniscal infiltration under ultrasound control of the knee for a clinically stable degenerative meniscal lesion confirmed by MRI and radiography.
  • Patient who has given free and informed consent.
  • Patient who has signed the consent form.
  • Patient affiliated or beneficiary of a health insurance plan.
  • Adult patient (≥18 years of age).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No iconographic evidence of meniscal injury.
  • Associated lesions of the central pivot of the knee.
  • Knee pain of osteoarthritic origin strongly suggested by the clinic associated with an advanced radiological stage of osteoarthritis (Ahlbach stages 3 and 4).
  • Presence of a skin lesion at the infiltration sites.
  • Suspected soft tissue or joint infection.
  • Patient participating in research involving human subjects defined as Category 1.
  • Patient in an exclusion period as determined by another study.
  • Patient under court protection, guardianship or trusteeship.
  • Patient unable to give consent.
  • Patient for whom it is impossible to give informed information.
  • Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Meniscal wall infiltration group
Administration of Diprostene: 1 ml syringe of Betamethasone 2 mg; injectable suspension in pre-filled syringe under ultrasound control.
Diprostène® will be injected into the knee. This is a 1 ml syringe of Betamethasone 2 mg, suspension for injection in pre-filled syringe.
Active Comparator: Intra-articular infiltration group

The procedure is identical in all respects to the experimental group, except that the ultrasound procedure is mimicked and the infiltration of dexamethasone 2 mg (Diprostene®) is performed intra-articularly.

Administration Diprostene: 1 ml syringe of Betamethasone 2 mg; injectable suspension in pre-filled syringe.

Diprostène® will be injected into the knee. This is a 1 ml syringe of Betamethasone 2 mg, suspension for injection in pre-filled syringe.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lysholm score before infiltration (intra-articular group)
Time Frame: 15 days before infiltration
The Lysholm score will be used to evaluate functionality 15 days before infiltration.The Lysholm Tegner score (Lysholm and Gillquist 1982) is a validated questionnaire for assessing knee functionality. The Lysholm score is rated from 0 to 100 (100 being the maximum functional score) and its repeatability is excellent (0.88 to 0.95). The scale has eight items: instability (/25), pain (/25), locking (/15), swelling (/10), stairs (/10), squatting (/5), limping (/5), use of a cane (/5). In 1985, Tegner added a scale of sports and occupational activity rated from 0 (occupational disability) to 10 (high level sport), hence the name Lysholm-Tegner score (Tegner and Lysholm 1985)
15 days before infiltration
Lysholm score before infiltration (meniscal wall group)
Time Frame: 15 days before infiltration
The Lysholm score will be used to evaluate functionality 15 days before infiltration.The Lysholm Tegner score (Lysholm and Gillquist 1982) is a validated questionnaire for assessing knee functionality. The Lysholm score is rated from 0 to 100 (100 being the maximum functional score) and its repeatability is excellent (0.88 to 0.95). The scale has eight items: instability (/25), pain (/25), locking (/15), swelling (/10), stairs (/10), squatting (/5), limping (/5), use of a cane (/5). In 1985, Tegner added a scale of sports and occupational activity rated from 0 (occupational disability) to 10 (high level sport), hence the name Lysholm-Tegner score (Tegner and Lysholm 1985)
15 days before infiltration
Lysholm score after infiltration (intra-articular group)
Time Frame: 3 months after infiltration
The Lysholm score will be used to evaluate functionality 3 months after infiltration.The Lysholm Tegner score (Lysholm and Gillquist 1982) is a validated questionnaire for assessing knee functionality. The Lysholm score is rated from 0 to 100 (100 being the maximum functional score) and its repeatability is excellent (0.88 to 0.95). The scale has eight items: instability (/25), pain (/25), locking (/15), swelling (/10), stairs (/10), squatting (/5), limping (/5), use of a cane (/5). In 1985, Tegner added a scale of sports and occupational activity rated from 0 (occupational disability) to 10 (high level sport), hence the name Lysholm-Tegner score (Tegner and Lysholm 1985)
3 months after infiltration
Lysholm score after infiltration (meniscal wall group)
Time Frame: 3 months after infiltration
The Lysholm score will be used to evaluate functionality 3 months after infiltration.The Lysholm Tegner score (Lysholm and Gillquist 1982) is a validated questionnaire for assessing knee functionality. The Lysholm score is rated from 0 to 100 (100 being the maximum functional score) and its repeatability is excellent (0.88 to 0.95). The scale has eight items: instability (/25), pain (/25), locking (/15), swelling (/10), stairs (/10), squatting (/5), limping (/5), use of a cane (/5). In 1985, Tegner added a scale of sports and occupational activity rated from 0 (occupational disability) to 10 (high level sport), hence the name Lysholm-Tegner score (Tegner and Lysholm 1985)
3 months after infiltration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Arthroscopy required within six months of infiltration: (intra-articular group)
Time Frame: 6 months after infiltration
Yes/No and, if so, the date of the arthroscopy will be recorded.
6 months after infiltration
Arthroscopy required within six months of infiltration: (meniscal wall group)
Time Frame: 6 months after infiltration
Yes/No and, if so, the date of the arthroscopy will be recorded.
6 months after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (intra-articular group)
Time Frame: 15 days before infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
15 days before infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (intra-articular group)
Time Frame: 1 week after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
1 week after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (intra-articular group)
Time Frame: 2 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
2 weeks after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (intra-articular group)
Time Frame: 3 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
3 weeks after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (intra-articular group)
Time Frame: 4 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
4 weeks after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (intra-articular group)
Time Frame: 5 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
5 weeks after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (intra-articular group)
Time Frame: 6 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
6 weeks after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (intra-articular group)
Time Frame: 7 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
7 weeks after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (intra-articular group)
Time Frame: 8 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
8 weeks after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (intra-articular group)
Time Frame: 9 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
9 weeks after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (intra-articular group)
Time Frame: 10 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
10 weeks after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (intra-articular group)
Time Frame: 11 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
11 weeks after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (intra-articular group)
Time Frame: 12 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
12 weeks after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (meniscal wall group)
Time Frame: 15 days before infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
15 days before infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (meniscal wall group)
Time Frame: 1 week after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
1 week after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (meniscal wall group)
Time Frame: 2 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
2 weeks after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (meniscal wall group)
Time Frame: 3 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
3 weeks after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (meniscal wall group)
Time Frame: 4 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
4 weeks after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (meniscal wall group)
Time Frame: 5 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
5 weeks after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (meniscal wall group)
Time Frame: 6 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
6 weeks after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (meniscal wall group)
Time Frame: 7 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
7 weeks after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (meniscal wall group)
Time Frame: 8 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
8 weeks after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (meniscal wall group)
Time Frame: 9 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
9 weeks after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (meniscal wall group)
Time Frame: 10 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
10 weeks after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (meniscal wall group)
Time Frame: 11 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
11 weeks after infiltration
Pain evaluated by the patient (meniscal wall group)
Time Frame: 12 weeks after infiltration
Pain will be evaluated by the patient on a visual analog scale (0-10) once a week up to 3 months after infiltration.
12 weeks after infiltration
Return to physical activity (intra-articular infiltration group)
Time Frame: Day 0 to Month 6
The number of days taken for the patient to return to physical activity
Day 0 to Month 6
Return to physical activity (meniscal wall infiltration group)
Time Frame: Day 0 to Month 6
The number of days taken for the patient to return to physical activity
Day 0 to Month 6
Adverse events in the intra-articular infiltration group
Time Frame: Day 0 to 3 months after infiltration
Collection of all possible adverse events from D0 to M3. Qualitative
Day 0 to 3 months after infiltration
Adverse events in the meniscal wall infiltration group
Time Frame: Day 0 to 3 months after infiltration
Collection of all possible adverse events from D0 to M3. Qualitative
Day 0 to 3 months after infiltration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 12, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 4, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

May 4, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee

Clinical Trials on Injection of corticosteroids (Diprostène®)

Subscribe