Laparoscopic Fascial Duplication Plus Sacral Colpopexy in Posterior Vaginal Prolapse

February 13, 2022 updated by: Andrea Morciano, Azienda Ospedaliera Cardinale G. Panico

Laparoscopic Fascial Duplication Plus Sacral Colpopexy in Posterior Vaginal Prolapse: a Randomized Clinical Trial

A Randomized Clinical Trial on Laparoscopic Fascial posterior vaginal duplication with absorbable sutures plus sacral colpopexy mesh placement VS sacral colpopexy isolated for vaginal posterior prolapse

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy is the gold standard procedure for pelvic organ prolapse. Anyway, vaginal fascial surgery is already considered the most appropriate for posterior vaginal prolapse. This prospective randomized pilot study is aimed to verify if the combination of laparoscopic duplication of vaginal fascia with absorbable sutures could increase benefits of sacral colpopexy on the posterior vagina in terms of prolapse (evaluating 1 year POP-Q).

Secondary endpoints of this comparison are incidence of intra- or postoperative complications estimated blood loss, postoperative pain (evaluated by VAS), days of hospitalization and costs for the health care system.

Statistical Analysis and Study Design This is a single Institution prospective randomized clinical trial conducted at the Pia Fondazione Panico of Tricase, Italy.

To have an imbalanced results and to reduce any bias, a randomization list has been checked.

Probability (p) values will be considered to be statistically significant at the <0.05 level.

There will be recruited 32 patients for Groups. Group 1: Laparoscopic Fascial posterior vaginal duplication with absorbable sutures plus sacral colpopexy mesh placement Vs Group 2: Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy isolated for vaginal posterior prolapse.

All patients will be adequately informed and inserted in the study only after having read and signed an informed consent. Diagnostic, clinical and surgical data of each patient will be prospectively recorded. At the end of the procedure, a schedule will be compiled with intraoperative data. All clinical and histologic data will be recorded prospectively using a database. Pain associated with the procedure will be evaluated by a subjective assessment (analysis of VAS scale values reported by patients at 8 and 24 hours after surgery). Post-operative complications will be evaluated during the first 30 days after surgery according to Dindo's classification.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Lecce
      • Tricase, Lecce, Italy, 73039
        • Pia Fondazione Panico

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 80 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Age ≤ 80 years Patient's informed consent American Society of Anesthesiologists: < class III or IV

No previous major abdominal surgical procedures POP-Q stage > or =III for posterior compartment. No uterine cervix dysplasia or endometrial disorders. No uterine size larger than conform 10 weeks gestation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Duplication plus LSC
Laparoscopic duplication of posterior vagina plus mesh placement
Laparoscopic Fascial Posterior Vagina Duplication with absorbable sutures for posterior prolapse (plus standard Sacral Colpopexy)
No Intervention: LSC
Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy with mesh placement on posterior vagina

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
POP-Q
Time Frame: 1 year
POP-Q evaluation
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrea Morciano, Pia Fondazione Panico

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 20, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 20, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1202TricaseLSC

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Fascial Posterior Vagina Duplication

Subscribe