Multicenter Study on the Correction of Prolapse Via Laparoscopy

In the laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) technique, the fixation of the mesh as a prosthetic element for correcting anterior apical vaginal prolapse at the level of the dome or uterus can offer anatomical and functional results that are not inferior to those of the conventional surgical technique, minimize possible intraoperative complications and facilitate the specific learning curve of sacropexy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In the laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) technique, the fixation of the mesh as a prosthetic element for correcting anterior apical vaginal prolapse at the level of the dome or uterus can offer anatomical and functional results that are not inferior to those of the conventional surgical technique, minimize possible intraoperative complications and facilitate the specific learning curve of sacropexy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

181

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with Stage II- IV primary or recurrent prolapse affecting the anterior or middle vaginal compartment with or without minimal posterior defect (Stage I) according to the POP-Q.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of abdominal prolapse reconstructive surgery.
  • History of prolapse reconstructive surgery with vaginal meshes.
  • Stage I according to the POP-Q classification or asymptomatic prolapse.
  • Medical contraindication for general anaesthesia.
  • Patient preference for vaginal surgical treatment.
  • Patient does not wish to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: lateral laparoscopic suspension (LLS)
lateral laparoscopic suspension (LLS)
Active Comparator: Sacropexy without posterior mesh fixation on the puborrectalis muscle
Sacropexy without posterior mesh fixation on the puborrectalis muscle

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI-6) Scores range between 0 and 24 for the POPDI-6
up to 12 months
Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI-8) Scores between 0 and 32 for the CRADI-8
up to 12 months
Urinary Distress Inventory
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6) Scores between 0 and 24 for the UDI-6.
up to 12 months
Number of patients with symptomatic failure
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Number of patients with symptomatic failure , defined as a positive response (accompanied by any degree of discomfort) to the following question on the validated questionnaire regarding prolapse symptoms (PFDI-20): "Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in your vaginal area?"
up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intestinal and pain symptoms
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Subjective or functional success is defined as an improvement of ≥15 points per domain (the minimally important difference) or a decrease in the total score of 45 points (the minimally important difference). The PISQ-2 questionnaire has a score range between 0 and 48, and a difference ≥ 6 points is considered a minimally important difference.
up to 12 months
Anatomical result
Time Frame: up to 12 months

Anatomical results are defined as any POP-Q measurement below the hymen.

Anatomical variables of prolapse: POPQ classification :

  • Anterior compartment: Aa, Ba
  • Middle compartment: C or D
  • Posterior compartment: Ap, Bp
up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Floor Disorders

Clinical Trials on lateral laparoscopic suspension (LLS)

Subscribe