Assessment of Vertical Root Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Instrumented by Single Endodontic Files

March 17, 2022 updated by: Urooj Musheer, Dow University of Health Sciences
The purpose of this study is the assessment of vertical root fracture resistance of roots prepared with three different single endodontic rotary files in extracted human mandibular premolar roots.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

88 human extracted mandibular premolars will be selected. Teeth will be sectioned below cementoenamel junction to get 13mm from the apex of root. Roots will then be standardized according to buccolingual and mesiodistal widths and will be examined for fracture and craze lines. The roots will then be randomly divided into 3 experimental groups and 1 control group (n=22). Group 1 will be instrumented with Hyflex EDM. Group 2 will be instrumented with F6 Sky Taper. Group 3 will be instrumented with One Shape and Group 4 will be negative control group in which no instrumentation will be done. After performing rotary instrumentation, roots will then be obturated with respective GP and sealer. Samples will then be exposed to vertical load utilizing Universal Testing Machine till fracture occur which will be recorded in Newton(N).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

88

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sindh
      • Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, 75300
        • Dow University of Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Extracted Human mandibular premolar canals that fulfill the following criteria were used.

    • permanent teeth
    • intact and fully formed apices
    • straight and single rooted canal
    • roots having similar diameter mesiodistally(2-4mm) and buccolingually(4-6mm)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Roots having following features were excluded;

    • root caries
    • roots with multiple canals
    • previous root canal treatment done
    • signs of calcification, internal and external root resorption
    • cracks
    • fracture lines
    • C-shaped canals
    • Vertical Root Fracture

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hyflex EDm
The canals were prepared and shaped with one file (25/~) and finished with 40/.04 using crown down technique. Torque controlled endodontic motor was used with a rotational speed of 500 rpm and torque of 2.5Ncm (25 Nm).
Root canal shaping procedures were performed. Irrigation was done after each three pecks of endodontic file. After instrumentation (Groups 1-3), the canals were dried with sterile paper points. The dentinal walls were then coated with Sealapex. For vertical root fracture resistance testing, sample preparation was done in acrylic blocks. Then roots were coated with polyvinylsiloxane impression material. After that roots were inserted again into acrylic resin blocks. The acrylic blocks with the vertically aligned roots were mounted in the Instron testing machine. 0.5 mm diameter round tip stainless-steel rod was fixed to the universal testing machine. The universal testing machine was adjusted and vertical compressive force was applied at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. The Instron tester applied a slowly increasing force, until the root fractured. The maximum amount of force necessary to fracture every sample was recorded in Newton (N).
Experimental: F6 SkyTaper
The canals were prepared and shaped with one file (25/~) and finished with 40/.04 using crown down technique. Torque controlled endodontic motor was used with a rotational speed of 500 rpm and torque of 2.5Ncm (25 Nm).
Root canal shaping procedures were performed. Irrigation was done after each three pecks of endodontic file. After instrumentation (Groups 1-3), the canals were dried with sterile paper points. The dentinal walls were then coated with Sealapex. For vertical root fracture resistance testing, sample preparation was done in acrylic blocks. Then roots were coated with polyvinylsiloxane impression material. After that roots were inserted again into acrylic resin blocks. The acrylic blocks with the vertically aligned roots were mounted in the Instron testing machine. 0.5 mm diameter round tip stainless-steel rod was fixed to the universal testing machine. The universal testing machine was adjusted and vertical compressive force was applied at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. The Instron tester applied a slowly increasing force, until the root fractured. The maximum amount of force necessary to fracture every sample was recorded in Newton (N).
Experimental: One Shape
Canals were prepared and shaped with single rotational file system One Shape with the sequence of Endoflare (12, 0.12), One G (18, 0.03) and One Shape (12.06) connected to endodontic motor with rotational speed of 400rpm and 4 Ncm torque as recommended by manufacturer.
Root canal shaping procedures were performed. Irrigation was done after each three pecks of endodontic file. After instrumentation (Groups 1-3), the canals were dried with sterile paper points. The dentinal walls were then coated with Sealapex. For vertical root fracture resistance testing, sample preparation was done in acrylic blocks. Then roots were coated with polyvinylsiloxane impression material. After that roots were inserted again into acrylic resin blocks. The acrylic blocks with the vertically aligned roots were mounted in the Instron testing machine. 0.5 mm diameter round tip stainless-steel rod was fixed to the universal testing machine. The universal testing machine was adjusted and vertical compressive force was applied at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. The Instron tester applied a slowly increasing force, until the root fractured. The maximum amount of force necessary to fracture every sample was recorded in Newton (N).
No Intervention: Control
In the control group, no endodontic instrumentation and shaping was done in the canals. Only the necrotic pulp tissue was extirpated from the canals with the help of barbed broaches and then the specimens were analyzed for fracture testing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vertical Root Fracture Resistance
Time Frame: 5 minutes
The acrylic blocks with the vertically aligned roots were mounted in the Instron testing machine one at a time. 0.5 mm diameter round tip stainless-steel rod was fixed to the upper stage of the universal testing machine (Instron, Canton, MA, USA). The rod was centered over the canal orifice of each root. The universal testing machine (Instron) was adjusted and vertical compressive force was applied at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. The Instron tester applied a slowly increasing force, at a rate of 1.0 mm per min, until the root fractured. This point was verified by the computer monitoring the Instron testing machine; at the same time the crack was heard, the monitor showed a sharp drop in force. The test was terminated at this point and the force applied was recorded. The maximum amount of force necessary to fracture every sample was recorded in Newton (N).
5 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Crack pattern
Time Frame: 2 minutes
crack pattern is complete/incomplete
2 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Farah Naz, BDS,FCPS, Dow University of Health Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB-1658/DUHS/Approval/2020/

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vertical Fracture of Root of Tooth (Disorder)

Clinical Trials on Endodontic Root Canal Treatment

Subscribe