Effectiveness of rTMS on Pain and Quality of Life in Patients With Cancer Neuropathic Pain. Clinical Trial.

June 5, 2025 updated by: Catalina Lopera Muñetón, Fundacion Universitaria Maria Cano

Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on Pain and Quality of Life in Patients With Cancer Neuropathic Pain. Clinical Trial

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on pain and quality of life in patients with cancer neuropathic pain.

Although there are currently different therapeutic options for neuropathic pain, most are limited or restricted to pharmacotherapy. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a tool recently incorporated into neuroscience in the management of neuropathic cancer pain.

The study will include 10 patients with oncologic neuropathic pain who will receive 20 sessions of rTMS and the effect on pain and quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Neuropathic pain is defined as pain caused by a primary lesion or transient dysfunction of the central or peripheral nervous system. In cancer, it is generated as a consequence of multiple factors such as: direct compression of nerve structures, post-surgical nerve injuries, and nerve injuries secondary to chemotherapy. At least 3.5 million people around the world suffer from this symptom associated with cancer; Of this population, 38% experience pain in all stages and 80% in advanced stages, negatively impacting quality of life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Antioquia
      • Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia, 055421
        • CORTEX

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with neuropathic pain of oncological origin
  • Patients of legal age (18 years old)
  • Patients using their cognitive faculties

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • History of negative reaction to TMS
  • History of seizure, history of epilepsy stroke, brain surgery and cranial metal implants.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active intervention
Patients will receive 20 sessions of transcranial magnetic stimulation applied with the MagVenture Mag Pro R20 equipment, these sessions will be held daily from Monday to Friday, lasting 20 minutes at an intensity of 81% with a motor threshold of 90 A/ns.
rTMS is a minimal invasive technique which focus on the M1 cortex. It can stimulate the cortex by depolarizing superficial neurons. For this study we will use a MagVenture MagPro R20
Other Names:
  • rTMS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect of Change of 20 rTMS Sessions on Pain
Time Frame: Day 1 vs Day 20 vs 1st month follow up and vs 3rd month follow up
Assessment of pain quantify by Visual analogue scale rated from 0-10, where 0 is the least pain and 10 the worst pain
Day 1 vs Day 20 vs 1st month follow up and vs 3rd month follow up
Effect of Change of 20 rTMS Sessions on Pain and Functionality
Time Frame: Day 1 vs Day 20 vs 1st month follow up and vs 3th month follow up
Assessment of pain severity and functionality quantify by brief pain inventory from 0-10, where 0 is the least pain and 10 the worst pain
Day 1 vs Day 20 vs 1st month follow up and vs 3th month follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect of Change of 20 rTMS Sessions on Quality of Life
Time Frame: Day 1 vs Day 20 vs 1st month follow up and vs 3rd month follow up
Assessment of Quality of life, measured by Functional Assessment of cancer Therapy (FACT-GOG- NTX 13) (0-100) higher number means a better quality of life
Day 1 vs Day 20 vs 1st month follow up and vs 3rd month follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Catalina Lopera, Msc, Fundación Universitaria María Cano

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 11, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 23, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data obtained through this study may be provided to qualified researchers with academic interest in oncological neuropathic pain. Data or samples shared will be coded. Approval of the request and execution of all applicable agreements are prerequisites to the sharing of data with the requesting party.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data requests can be submitted starting 12 months after article publication and the data will made accessible for up to 18 months. Extensions will be considered on a case-by-case basis

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to trial IPD can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA). For more information or to submit a request, please contact catalinaloperamuneton@fumc.edu.co

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe