- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05578703
ABLATE WEIGHT (Ablation Plus ESG for Weight Loss)
May 13, 2024 updated by: True You Weight Loss
Gastric Fundus Ablation Plus Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for Weight Loss
The purpose of this research is to investigate the effects of fundic ablation (FA) on circulating plasma ghrelin, satiation, and total body weight loss, as well as the incidence of adverse events.
This procedure will be carried out with the HybridAPC (ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany).
The HybridAPC instrument creates an electric current to deliver a safe amount of thermal injury to a portion of the stomach known as the gastric fundus.
This thermal injury will target a hormone called ghrelin which is the only known hormone linked to increasing appetite, calorie intake, and weight gain.
This procedure is designed to target the bodily effects of appetite control and gastric sensory and motor functions which cause the feeling of fullness and satiation.
The fundic mucosal ablation is not typically done prior to the endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty procedure.
When fundic mucosal ablation is sequentially paired with endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG), this combined investigational approach may lead to decreased fasting ghrelin levels, improved satiation, and greater total body weight loss than traditional ESG.
This study will help determine if the combined impact of FA with ESG should be made available to patients as part of a comprehensive weight loss strategy.
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Detailed Description
Obesity is a chronic disease state driven by the imbalance of caloric intake and expenditure and mediated by multiple central and peripheral pathways that may serve as targets for therapeutic interventions.
The endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is a per oral gastric remodeling technique that employs full-thickness suturing to imbricate the stomach along the greater curvature to achieve a restricted, sleeve-like configuration.
While the ESG recapitulates the configuration of a gastric sleeve, it has not yet been shown to achieve as robust weight loss outcomes compared to the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).
A major difference between ESG and LSG is that the former does not involve the gastric fundus.
The proximal stomach, and the fundus in particular, produces ghrelin, the only known orexigenic hormone, which has been linked to increased calorie intake and weight gain.
Studies have observed reduced levels of ghrelin along multiple timepoints following LSG, and this has been attributed to targeting of the fundus, as bariatric surgeries that did not involve the fundus did not see a decrease in circulating plasma ghrelin.
In contrast, in a small comparative study of ESG and LSG, patients who had undergone ESG did not show any decrease in fasting ghrelin levels, 8 ostensibly due to fundic-sparing.
In this study, the investigators propose to investigate the effects of fundic ablation (FA) on circulating plasma ghrelin, satiation via standard nutrient drink test, and total body weight loss (TBWL), as well as the incidence of adverse events.
Fundic ablation will be followed sequentially with ESG, to evaluate the combined impact of FA and ESG (FA-ESG).
This study hypothesizes that, compared to baseline, FA-ESG will diminish fasting ghrelin levels, improve satiation, and induce a TBWL ≥ 15% at 12 months.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
10
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Cary, North Carolina, United States, 27513
- True You Weight Loss
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
21 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects aged 21-65
- Body mass Index (BMI) ≥30 kilograms per square meter (kg/m²), or ≤50 kg/m²
- History of at least one unsuccessful dietary effort to lose body weight
- Willing and able to participate in the study procedures
- Understand and voluntarily sign the informed consent
- Approved ESG candidate at TYWL
- Access to internet
- Reliable transportation to and from Cary, North Carolina surrounding area
Exclusion Criteria:
- Younger than 21 years of age
- Older than 65 years of age
- Patients on any medications or supplements including those that may influence cholecystokinin (CCK), glucose, growth hormone, insulin and/or somatostatin levels
- Milk and/or soy allergies
- History of any stomach manipulation (including repair of hiatal hernia)
- History of disordered eating
- Patients who do not give their consent to the enrollment in the study or are incompetent, unconscious or unable to express their consent for any reason
- Hemoglobin A1c > 7.0 or any patient with symptoms suggestive of gastroparesis or a formal diagnosis of gastroparesis
- Patients taking the following medications known to impair gastric accommodation: buspirone, mirtazapine
- Patients taking the following medications known to accelerate or impair gastric emptying: Reglan (metoclopramide), Zelnorm (tegaserod), Motegrity (prucalopride), erythromycin, Motilium (domperidone), opiates, anticholinergic agents
- Patients who are pregnant or who plan to become pregnant during study duration
- Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications without the ability to stop these during study duration
- Patients on chronic anticoagulation
- History of functional gastrointestinal disorder, including functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, or other syndromes known to affect gastric sensorimotor function.
- Concurrent use of weight loss medications.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Gastric Fundic Ablation plus Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty
Subjects will undergo fundic mucosal ablation followed by endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
|
Fundic mucosal ablation followed by endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty in the treatment of adults with obesity
Fundic mucosal ablation utilizing approved ERBE HybridAPC
Using only Apollo ESG as approved per label
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from Baseline in Fasting Plasma Ghrelin Levels
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, and Month 18
|
Change from baseline for the quantitative determination of fasting ghrelin, total plasma measured by EIA/ELISA laboratory assays
|
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, and Month 18
|
|
Change from Baseline in Timed Standardized Nutrient Drink Test
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, and Month 18
|
Measure timed consumption of a standardized nutrient drink test utilizing a sensation of satiation visual analogue scale.
The severity of symptoms range from 0 (no symptoms) to 5 (maximum or unbearable fullness/satiation) and will measure volume to comfortable fullness (VTF) and maximum tolerated volume (MTV)
|
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, and Month 18
|
|
Change from Baseline in Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, and Month 18
|
Assess the severity of patient-reported gastroparesis symptoms.
The GCSI gastroparesis symptoms score ranges from 0-none to 5-very severe.
High scores reflect greater symptom severity
|
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, and Month 18
|
|
Change from Baseline in Daily Eats: Measuring Daily Eating Factors (DAILY EATS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, and Month 18
|
Rate the responses to the DAILY EATS questionnaire.
The DAILY EATS questionnaire is designed to better understand patient's definitions, experience, and importance, of eating-related factors on a scale of 0-10.
The DAILY EATS is a 5-item, patient-reported measure evaluating key eating-related factors (Worst and Average Hunger, Appetite, Cravings, and Satiety)
|
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, and Month 18
|
|
Percent Change in Total Body Weight Loss (TBWL) from Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 4, Month 5, Month 6, Month 7, Month 8, Month 9, Month 10, Month 11, Month 12, Month 13, Month 14, Month 15, Month 16, Month 17, and Month 18
|
Measure percent change in total body weight over time following FA alone and FA-ESG.
TBWL = pre-op weight - post op body weight.
% TBWL is the fraction of body weight expressed in percentage term
|
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 4, Month 5, Month 6, Month 7, Month 8, Month 9, Month 10, Month 11, Month 12, Month 13, Month 14, Month 15, Month 16, Month 17, and Month 18
|
|
Change from Baseline in Weight Efficacy Life-Style Questionnaire Short Form (WEL-SF) composite score
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, and Month 18
|
Measure of eating self-efficacy consisting of 8-items on a scale of 0 (not at all confident) to 10 (very confident)
|
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, and Month 18
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of safety and adverse events
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 4, Month 5, Month 6, Month 7, Month 8, Month 9, Month 10, Month 11, Month 12, Month 13, Month 14, Month 15, Month 16, Month 17, and Month 18
|
FA and FA-ESG safety will be measured by the rate of serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse events (AEs), and accommodative symptom occurrence
|
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 4, Month 5, Month 6, Month 7, Month 8, Month 9, Month 10, Month 11, Month 12, Month 13, Month 14, Month 15, Month 16, Month 17, and Month 18
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Christopher E McGowan, MD, MSCR, CEO/ Medical Director
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Fayad L, Oberbach A, Schweitzer M, Askin F, Voltaggio L, Larman T, Enderle M, Hahn H, Khashab MA, Kalloo AN, Kumbhari V. Gastric mucosal devitalization (GMD): translation to a novel endoscopic metabolic therapy. Endosc Int Open. 2019 Dec;7(12):E1640-E1645. doi: 10.1055/a-0957-3067. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
- Langer FB, Reza Hoda MA, Bohdjalian A, Felberbauer FX, Zacherl J, Wenzl E, Schindler K, Luger A, Ludvik B, Prager G. Sleeve gastrectomy and gastric banding: effects on plasma ghrelin levels. Obes Surg. 2005 Aug;15(7):1024-9. doi: 10.1381/0960892054621125.
- Fukunishi Y. [Electron microscopic findings in peripheral nerve lesions of nude mouse inoculated with M. leprae--perineural lesion]. Nihon Rai Gakkai Zasshi. 1985 Jul-Sep;54(3):82-7. doi: 10.5025/hansen1977.54.82. No abstract available. Japanese.
- Cummings DE, Overduin J. Gastrointestinal regulation of food intake. J Clin Invest. 2007 Jan;117(1):13-23. doi: 10.1172/JCI30227.
- Goitein D, Lederfein D, Tzioni R, Berkenstadt H, Venturero M, Rubin M. Mapping of ghrelin gene expression and cell distribution in the stomach of morbidly obese patients--a possible guide for efficient sleeve gastrectomy construction. Obes Surg. 2012 Apr;22(4):617-22. doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0585-9.
- Anderson B, Switzer NJ, Almamar A, Shi X, Birch DW, Karmali S. The impact of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on plasma ghrelin levels: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2013 Sep;23(9):1476-80. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-0999-7.
- McCarty TR, Jirapinyo P, Thompson CC. Effect of Sleeve Gastrectomy on Ghrelin, GLP-1, PYY, and GIP Gut Hormones: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2020 Jul;272(1):72-80. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003614.
- Lopez-Nava G, Negi A, Bautista-Castano I, Rubio MA, Asokkumar R. Gut and Metabolic Hormones Changes After Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) Vs. Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG). Obes Surg. 2020 Jul;30(7):2642-2651. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04541-0.
- Vijayvargiya P, Chedid V, Wang XJ, Atieh J, Maselli D, Burton DD, Clark MM, Acosta A, Camilleri M. Associations of gastric volumes, ingestive behavior, calorie and volume intake, and fullness in obesity. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2020 Aug 1;319(2):G238-G244. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00140.2020. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
- Chial HJ, Camilleri C, Delgado-Aros S, Burton D, Thomforde G, Ferber I, Camilleri M. A nutrient drink test to assess maximum tolerated volume and postprandial symptoms: effects of gender, body mass index and age in health. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2002 Jun;14(3):249-53. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2982.2002.00326.x.
- Fastenau J, Rozjabek H, Qin S, McLeod L, Nelson L, Ma J, Harris N. Psychometric evaluation of the DAILY EATS questionnaire in individuals living with obesity. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Nov 23;4(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00259-w.
- Ames GE, Heckman MG, Diehl NN, Grothe KB, Clark MM. Further statistical and clinical validity for the Weight Efficacy Lifestyle Questionnaire-Short Form. Eat Behav. 2015 Aug;18:115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 May 21.
- Lopez Nava G, Arau RT, Asokkumar R, Maselli DB, Rapaka B, Matar R, Bautista I, Espinos Perez JC, Bilbao AM, Jaruvongvanich V, Vargas EJ, Storm AC, Neto MG, Abu Dayyeh BK. Prospective Multicenter Study of the Primary Obesity Surgery Endoluminal (POSE 2.0) Procedure for Treatment of Obesity. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jan;21(1):81-89.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.04.019. Epub 2022 May 6.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 9, 2022
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 6, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 10, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
October 13, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 14, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 13, 2024
Last Verified
May 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PS-001
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.