Cortical Disarray Measurement in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease (CONGA)

An Observational Longitudinal Cohort Study to Investigate Cortical Disarray Measurement in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease

The aim of this study is to find out whether a new image analysis technique called Cortical Disarray Measurement (CDM) could be used to help better diagnose Alzheimer's disease. This study will see whether changes on CDM can be used to identify Alzheimer's disease from a group of people living with memory and thinking problems. The study will also explore how CDM relates to changes in memory or thinking over time.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

This is a multi-centre observational longitudinal cohort study to evaluate and optimise the Cortical Disarray Measurement (CDM) technique for diagnosis and prognosis in patients with mild cognitive impairment and prodromal / mild Alzheimer's Disease. CDM is a novel MRI analysis tool that quantifies cortical and regional diffusion tensor imaging signals in grey matter to observe pathological changes related to neurodegeneration. Participants in this study will be monitored for 2 years.

Research Aims:

  • Assess the accuracy of CDM in detecting progressive change in cognitive and functional measures over 2 years in participants presenting with mild cognitive impairment or early dementia.
  • Determine the relationship between CDM (both cross-sectionally and longitudinally) and change on standard cognitive and functional assessment measures.
  • Explore patient and companion views and experiences of the diagnostic journey for dementia and their views on CDM implementation.
  • To explore the costs and consequences of introducing CDM-augmented MRI as a form of early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in people presenting with MCI or mild AD compared to current practice.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bournemouth, United Kingdom
        • Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust
      • Cardiff, United Kingdom
        • Cardiff And Vale University Health Board
    • Hampshire
      • Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom, SO16 6YD
        • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

46 years to 86 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

A total of 200 patient participants and 200 study companions will be recruited to the study. Patient participants will have a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or prodromal / mild Alzheimer's Disease. Participants with a global CDR score of 0.5 and 1 will be recruited in a minimum of a 2:1 ratio respectively in the study.

Description

PATIENT PARTICIPANTS

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or prodromal Alzheimer's Disease (AD) as defined by National Institute on Ageing/Alzheimer's Association (NIA/AA) diagnostic criteria for MCI/prodromal AD, NOT including MCI unlikely due to AD; OR, Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease as defined by NIA/AA criteria for probable AD
  • Clinical dementia rating (CDR) scale global score of very mild or mild (0.5 or 1) impairment
  • Ability to undergo and tolerate MRI scans, with no contraindications to MRI
  • Ability to tolerate blood draws
  • Ability to give informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Do not meet the inclusion criteria
  • No study companion available
  • Individuals with a non-progressive learning disability
  • Pregnant or intending to become pregnant during the study

COMPANION PARTICIPANTS

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged over 18 years
  • Sufficient knowledge on study participant's condition to complete companion assessments of the patient, in the investigator's judgement
  • Able and willing to attend all clinical visits for completion of companion assessments or provide the relevant assessments remotely via phone or video call

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A condition or reason, in the investigator's judgement, that would question the validity of the acquired companion reported data
  • Individuals who are not fluent in English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patient Participants
Patient participants will have a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or prodromal / mild Alzheimer's Disease. Participants with a global CDR score of 0.5 and 1 will be recruited in a minimum of a 2:1 ratio respectively in the study.
Study Companions
Study companions will have sufficient knowledge on the patient participant's condition to complete companion assessments of the patient, in the investigator's judgement, for example they may be carers of the patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CDR Progression
Time Frame: Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
CDR Progression defined as a binary variable (yes/no) indicating either an increase in global outcome on Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale (which takes value 0, 0.5, 1, 2 or 3, with higher scores reflecting more severe dementia), or an increase greater than, or equal to, 2 points on CDR Sum of Boxes (which takes values from 0 to 18 with higher values indicating a worse outcome)
Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CDR Sum of Boxes
Time Frame: Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
Change from baseline in the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Sum of Boxes. CDR Sum of boxes is the sum over 6 domains (memory, orientation, judgment & problem solving, community affairs, home & hobbies, and personal care), each rated on a 5-point scale (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3), giving a total score that ranges from 0 to 18, with higher values indicating a worse outcome.
Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
ADAS-cog
Time Frame: Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
Change from baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog). Higher scores for ADAS-Cog represent a worse outcome.
Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
MMSE
Time Frame: Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
Change from baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). MMSE ranges from 0 to 30, with lower scores representing a worse outcome.
Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
ADCOMS
Time Frame: Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
Change from baseline in Alzheimer's disease composite score (ADCOMS). The range of ADCOMS is between 0 and 1.97, with higher scores representing a worse outcome.
Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
RBANS
Time Frame: Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
Change from baseline in the RBANS total score. The repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS) is a brief neuropsychological battery. The total score can classify patients as follows: Average/Mild Impairment (standard scores of 70 or above), Moderate Impairment (standard scores from 55 to 69), and Severe Impairment (standard scores <54), such that lower scores indicate a worse outcome.
Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
ADCS-ADL
Time Frame: Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
Change from baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS-ADL). ADCS-ADL
Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ)
Time Frame: Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
The Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) measures instrumental activities of daily living. Scores range from 0 (independent) to 30 (dependent), with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
Institutionalisation or POC
Time Frame: Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
Institutionalisation in care home or nursing home or implementation of package of care (POC) for dementia. Binary outcome (yes, no), with "yes" indicating a worse outcome.
Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
Death (any cause)
Time Frame: Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
Death due to any cause
Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
EQ-5D-5L (Patient Participant)
Time Frame: Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
EuroQuol EQ-5D-5L is an instrument to describe and value health on five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
EQ-5D-5L (Study Companion)
Time Frame: Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
EuroQuol EQ-5D-5L is an instrument to describe and value health on five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
Zarit Burden Interview
Time Frame: Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
The Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) assesses caregiver perceptions of burden. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
Health and social care resource usage
Time Frame: Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24
Health and social care resource usage questionnaire. Higher values indicate a worse outcome.
Baseline (Study day 1) to month 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christopher Kipps, PhD, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
  • Study Chair: Steven Chance, PhD, Oxford Brain Diagnostics Ltd

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 28, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dementia

Subscribe