- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05687305
The Effect of White Noise in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery
The Effect of White Noise on Sleep Quality, Comfort and Satisfaction Level in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study
The aim of this clinical trial is to determine the effectiveness of listening to white noise on the sleep quality, comfort level, satisfaction level of patients after lumbar disc herniation surgery. The main hypotheses are:
- Is there a difference between the sleep quality of patients who listen to white noise and those who do not?
- Is there a difference between the comfort levels of patients who listen to white noise and those who do not?
- Is there a difference between the satisfaction levels of patients who listen to white noise and those who do not?
The main tasks that the participants will be asked to do will be explained and Their informed consent will be obtained. The two research groups will be compared.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
This study will be conducted with a total of 60 patients who underwent surgery for lumbar disc herniation at a hospital in Istanbul. Participants in the study who had lumbar disc herniation surgery will be divided into two groups: intervention (n = 30) and control group (n = 30), according to the randomization method created with computer-based random numbers.
On the 0th and 1st postoperative days, patients in the intervention group will listen to white noise with a bluetooth headset for 30 minutes before going to sleep, and they will be kept under observation during this time.Patients in the control group will be monitored according to their routine clinical procedures. Since there are no procedures or interventions in clinical procedures, only patient monitoring will be performed. Patients in the control group will also be followed up at the same times and with the same forms. Descriptive Characteristics Form, Informed Consent Form, The Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire, General Comfort Questionnaire,Visual Analog Scale for Satisfaction Level will be used in data collection.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey, 34255
- Melike Kızılkaya
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- underwent lumbar disc herniation surgery
- hospitalized for at least 48 hours
- agreed to participate in research
Exclusion Criteria:
- chronic sleep problems and taking medication
- Not filling out the questionnaire
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: No Intervention Group
Patients in the control group will not receive any intervention other than their routine.
Data collection forms will be applied to the participants in the control group at the same time as the intervention group.
|
|
|
Active Comparator: Intervention Group
On the 0th and 1st postoperative days, patients in the intervention group will listen to white noise with a bluetooth headset for 30 minutes before going to sleep, and they will be kept under observation during this time.Patients in the control group will be monitored according to their routine clinical procedures.
Since there are no procedures or interventions in clinical procedures, only patient monitoring will be performed.
Patients in the control group will also be followed up at the same times and with the same forms.
|
White noise is produced by digitally combining sounds of equal frequency in the laboratory.
Then, all of the frequencies in this sound are calibrated to generate noise at each frequency.
If the contribution of each region to the noise level is the same, the noise is referred to as white noise.
Waterfalls, ocean waves, and wind blowing through trees all produce similar to white noise.
Patients in the intervention group are observed by the investigator on the 0th and 1st postoperative days.Before going to sleep, a bluetooth headset will be used to listen to white noise for 30 minutes and vital signs will be measured before and after the procedure.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of Sleep Quality Assessed by the Richard Campbell Sleep Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline sleep quality at two days after surgery
|
The sleep quality of the patients was evaluated with the Richard Campbell Sleep Scale on the 1st and 2nd postoperative days after morning treatment.
This scale consists of 6 items and the total score range is 0-100 points.
As the scale score increases, the sleep quality of the patients also increases.
|
Change from baseline sleep quality at two days after surgery
|
|
Change of Comfort Level Assessed by the General Comfort Questionnaire Short Form
Time Frame: Change from baseline comfort level at two days after surgery
|
The general comfort levels of the patients were evaluated with the General Comfort Questionnaire Short Form after the morning treatment on the 1st and 2nd postoperative days.
This scale consists of 28 items and includes three sub-dimensions; comfort, relaxation and relaxation.
The scale score is calculated by dividing the total score obtained from the scale by the number of scale items.
The scale total score range is between 0-6 points.
As the scale score increases, the comfort level of the patients also increases.
|
Change from baseline comfort level at two days after surgery
|
|
Change of Satisfaction Level Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline satisfaction level at two days after surgery
|
The satisfaction levels of the patients were evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale on the 1st and 2nd postoperative days, after the morning treatment.
This scale consists of 10 cm horizontal lines and is evaluated between 0-10 points.
As the scale score increases, the satisfaction level of the patients also increases.
|
Change from baseline satisfaction level at two days after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Melike Kızılkaya, RN, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Murase K, Tabara Y, Ito H, Kobayashi M, Takahashi Y, Setoh K, Kawaguchi T, Muro S, Kadotani H, Kosugi S, Sekine A, Yamada R, Nakayama T, Mishima M, Matsuda S, Matsuda F, Chin K. Knee Pain and Low Back Pain Additively Disturb Sleep in the General Population: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Nagahama Study. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 7;10(10):e0140058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140058. eCollection 2015.
- Chou R, Baisden J, Carragee EJ, Resnick DK, Shaffer WO, Loeser JD. Surgery for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 1;34(10):1094-109. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a105fc.
- Kavcic N, Grenier S, McGill SM. Quantifying tissue loads and spine stability while performing commonly prescribed low back stabilization exercises. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Oct 15;29(20):2319-29. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000142222.62203.67.
- Akiyama A, Tsai JD, W Y Tam E, Kamino D, Hahn C, Go CY, Chau V, Whyte H, Wilson D, McNair C, Papaioannou V, Hugh SC, Papsin BC, Nishijima S, Yamazaki T, Miller SP, Ochi A. The Effect of Music and White Noise on Electroencephalographic (EEG) Functional Connectivity in Neonates in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. J Child Neurol. 2021 Jan;36(1):38-47. doi: 10.1177/0883073820947894. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 27.05.2022-22-36
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.