Feasibility of a Dog Training Therapy Program in UC Outpatient Youth Receiving Psychiatric Services

August 15, 2025 updated by: University of Chicago

Evaluating the Impact of a Canine-assisted Therapy Program in Youth Enrolled in Outpatient Treatment for Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Problems.

The goal of this pilot project is to test for initial efficacy of the Recovery & Care Canine-Assisted Therapy program that has been developed and implemented in Lawrence Hall, a Chicago-based residential treatment center for maltreated youth. In this study, the investigators test the feasibility, acceptability, and short-term efficacy of expanding the program to a group of youth currently in outpatient treatment for social, emotional, and behavioral problems. Results from this project will provide preliminary evidence of whether a structured, goal-oriented intervention program focused on dog training activities has direct impact on increasing youth emotional self-regulation, impulse control, and self-efficacy, which are important targets for intervention among youth with mental health problems. If successful, this project could lead to a larger, randomized control clinical trials study that tests the longitudinal impact of the program that could further lead to national dissemination of the Recovery & Care curriculum as an alternative therapeutic approach.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study uses a longitudinal, within-person design with two parallel conditions. This study involves three cohorts of youth who will participate in one of two 6-week interventions. For each cohort of youth, half of the sample will be randomly assigned to the Recovery & Care Canine-Assisted Therapy condition, and half of the sample will be randomly assigned to an active control condition (Canine Education & Bonding). The two conditions will run in parallel. The order of the two intervention conditions will be counterbalanced across study cohorts.

The Recovery & Care Canine-Assisted Therapy intervention is a 1.25 hour structured curriculum that will occur weekly across a period of 6 weeks. The program will be delivered by the Canine Therapy Corps (CTCorps) offsite at the CtCorps facility. Youth will work with CTC-affiliate staff, including trained dog-handler teams, a canine behavior expert, and a clinical supervisor to engage in a series of structured activities progress throughout the intervention. Week 1 is a "meet-and-greet" session where youth are introduced to all dog-handler teams participating in the program and will be asked to select a team to work with for the following sessions. Each youth is assigned their own dog-handler team. Weeks 2 cover activities regarding dog obedience, building from mastering basic commands which the dog already knows (such as "sit," "stay'") to the introduction of "new tricks" that the dog has not yet learned. In Weeks 3, youth will continue to work on mastering the "new tricks" with their dog-handler team and will also begin dog agility training. The agility training session progress in terms of complexity of number and types of obstacles. Week 4 is for proofing all skills (obedience, trick, agility) learned in previous sessions. Week 5 continues proofing all skills and is discussion of the graduation structure and dress rehearsal, and Week 6 is a graduation ceremony where family and friends are invited to observe the progress each youth has made with their dog-handler team. In Weeks 1-5, the goals of each session are outlined at the beginning of the session and brief education is provided regarding the session goals. Weeks 2-5 also include a review of the skills/activities covered in prior weeks. At the end of sessions 1-5, youth are asked to reflect on what they did during the session, including discussion of what they did really well, what they wanted to work on further, and goals for the next session. Research staff will be present during all sessions to record fidelity measures. The Positive and Negative Affect Scale will be administered on-site by research staff at the beginning and end of each intervention session. Change in affect are primary and secondary outcome measures.

The Canine Education & Bonding intervention is a series of 45-minute, semi-structured activities that will occur weekly across the same 6-week period as the Recovery & Care intervention. Youth will work with the same group of CTCorps-affiliate staff involved the Recovery & Care intervention, including the same set of dog-handler teams. These sessions will begin with education on basic aspects of dogs (e.g., different breed types, caring for dogs, etc.). Youth will then passively observe the dog-handler teams demonstrating basics of dog obedience and dog agility training that parallel that activities done in the Recovery & Care Canine-Assisted Therapy session that same week. Following the education and passive demonstration sessions, youth will be allowed to interact freely with the dog-handler teams. A brief mood questionnaire will be administered by research staff at the beginning and end of each session. Research staff will also be present during all sessions as observers and to record fidelity measures.

Baseline and Follow-up data will be collected up to 1-month before and 1-month after the intervention programs. Data collection for all subjects enrolled will be conducted by the University of Chicago Project staff, on site in the PI's lab at the University of Chicago or virtually.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Currently receiving outpatient mental health services at the University of Chicago or have received outpatient mental health services from the community in the last 12 months.
  • Available for scheduling during the entire 6-week intervention program
  • Interest in participating in the program

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive, psychiatric, or physical condition or limitation that would prevent participation.
  • Severe animal allergy
  • Animal phobia
  • History of mistreatment of animals.
  • Above-average scores on both measures of behavioral regulation and emotional regulation
  • WASI t-score of intellectual ability < 60.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental
Active intervention. Youth will be assigned to the active Recovery & Care Canine-Assisted Therapy intervention arm.
Active intervention. An 6-week session of structured, goal-oriented activities where youth focus on mastering dog obedience and dog training skills. Each session is 1 hour and 15 minutes in length and includes education, review of prior sessions, and specific skill-building activities. Skill-building activities progress in complexity during the course of the 6-week curriculum.
Other: Active control
Active control intervention. Youth will be assigned to the active Canine Education & Bonding arm.
Active control intervention. An 6-week session of semi-structured activities. Sessions are 45 minutes in length. Youth in this condition engage in an educational component, passive observation of dog-training skills, and an active free-play session with the dog-handler teams.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Emotional Stroop
Time Frame: Up to 1-month post-intervention
Computer-Assisted task assessing affect regulation
Up to 1-month post-intervention
Change in Emotional Stroop
Time Frame: Change from baseline to up to 1-month post-intervention
Computer-Assisted task assessing affect regulation
Change from baseline to up to 1-month post-intervention
Flanker Task
Time Frame: Up to 1-month post-intervention
Computer-Assisted task assessing attention & inhibitory control
Up to 1-month post-intervention
Change in Flanker Task
Time Frame: Change from baseline to up to 1-month post-intervention
Computer-Assisted task assessing attention & inhibitory control
Change from baseline to up to 1-month post-intervention
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
Time Frame: Up to 1-month post-intervention
10-item self-report scale assessing self-esteem. Higher scores are better outcomes
Up to 1-month post-intervention
Change in Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline to up to 1-month post-intervention
10-item self-report scale assessing self-esteem. Higher scores are better outcomes
Change from baseline to up to 1-month post-intervention
Change in Negative Affect
Time Frame: Change from the beginning to the end of each of the 6 weekly intervention sessions
In addition to overall change in outcomes post intervention, we are also interested in whether each intervention session produces an immediate change in youth emotion. We will assess negative affect using 5 self-report items on current mood from positive and negative affect scale. Higher scores are worse outcomes.
Change from the beginning to the end of each of the 6 weekly intervention sessions

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pearson Social Skills Rating Scales -Positive social behaviors
Time Frame: Up to 1-month post-intervention
Self-report subscale assessing cooperation, empathy, assertion, self-control, and responsibility. Higher scores are better outcomes.
Up to 1-month post-intervention
Change in Pearson Social Skills Rating Scales -Positive social behaviors
Time Frame: Change from baseline to up to 1-month post-intervention
Self-report subscale assessing cooperation, empathy, assertion, self-control, and responsibility. Higher scores are better outcomes.
Change from baseline to up to 1-month post-intervention
Pearson Social Skills Rating Scales -Externalizing behaviors
Time Frame: Up to 1-month post-intervention
Self-report subscale assessing aggressive acts and poor temper control. Higher scores are worse outcomes
Up to 1-month post-intervention
Change in Pearson Social Skills Rating Scales -Externalizing behaviors
Time Frame: Change from baseline to up to 1-month post-intervention
Self-report subscale assessing aggressive acts and poor temper control. Higher scores are worse outcomes
Change from baseline to up to 1-month post-intervention
Attendance and Attrition
Time Frame: Aggregated across the 6-week intervention program
Project staff will record the number of absences and drop-outs for youth enrolled in both study intervention conditions.
Aggregated across the 6-week intervention program
Self-Regulation Child Report
Time Frame: Up to 1-month post-intervention
Behavioral and emotional regulation subscales from the BRIEF-2 instrument
Up to 1-month post-intervention
Self-Regulation Parent Report
Time Frame: Up to 1-month post-intervention
Behavioral and emotional regulation subscales from the BRIEF-2 instrument
Up to 1-month post-intervention
Change in Positive Affect
Time Frame: Change from the beginning to the end of each of the 6 weekly intervention session
In addition to overall change in outcomes post intervention, we are also interested in whether each intervention session produces an immediate change in youth emotion. We will assess positive affect using 5 self-report items on current mood from positive and negative affect scale. Higher scores are better outcomes.
Change from the beginning to the end of each of the 6 weekly intervention session

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 26, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB22-1218

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Emotion Regulation

Clinical Trials on Recovery & Care Canine-Assisted Therapy

Subscribe