- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05788783
Feasibility of a Dog Training Therapy Program in UC Outpatient Youth Receiving Psychiatric Services
Evaluating the Impact of a Canine-assisted Therapy Program in Youth Enrolled in Outpatient Treatment for Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Problems.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study uses a longitudinal, within-person design with two parallel conditions. This study involves three cohorts of youth who will participate in one of two 6-week interventions. For each cohort of youth, half of the sample will be randomly assigned to the Recovery & Care Canine-Assisted Therapy condition, and half of the sample will be randomly assigned to an active control condition (Canine Education & Bonding). The two conditions will run in parallel. The order of the two intervention conditions will be counterbalanced across study cohorts.
The Recovery & Care Canine-Assisted Therapy intervention is a 1.25 hour structured curriculum that will occur weekly across a period of 6 weeks. The program will be delivered by the Canine Therapy Corps (CTCorps) offsite at the CtCorps facility. Youth will work with CTC-affiliate staff, including trained dog-handler teams, a canine behavior expert, and a clinical supervisor to engage in a series of structured activities progress throughout the intervention. Week 1 is a "meet-and-greet" session where youth are introduced to all dog-handler teams participating in the program and will be asked to select a team to work with for the following sessions. Each youth is assigned their own dog-handler team. Weeks 2 cover activities regarding dog obedience, building from mastering basic commands which the dog already knows (such as "sit," "stay'") to the introduction of "new tricks" that the dog has not yet learned. In Weeks 3, youth will continue to work on mastering the "new tricks" with their dog-handler team and will also begin dog agility training. The agility training session progress in terms of complexity of number and types of obstacles. Week 4 is for proofing all skills (obedience, trick, agility) learned in previous sessions. Week 5 continues proofing all skills and is discussion of the graduation structure and dress rehearsal, and Week 6 is a graduation ceremony where family and friends are invited to observe the progress each youth has made with their dog-handler team. In Weeks 1-5, the goals of each session are outlined at the beginning of the session and brief education is provided regarding the session goals. Weeks 2-5 also include a review of the skills/activities covered in prior weeks. At the end of sessions 1-5, youth are asked to reflect on what they did during the session, including discussion of what they did really well, what they wanted to work on further, and goals for the next session. Research staff will be present during all sessions to record fidelity measures. The Positive and Negative Affect Scale will be administered on-site by research staff at the beginning and end of each intervention session. Change in affect are primary and secondary outcome measures.
The Canine Education & Bonding intervention is a series of 45-minute, semi-structured activities that will occur weekly across the same 6-week period as the Recovery & Care intervention. Youth will work with the same group of CTCorps-affiliate staff involved the Recovery & Care intervention, including the same set of dog-handler teams. These sessions will begin with education on basic aspects of dogs (e.g., different breed types, caring for dogs, etc.). Youth will then passively observe the dog-handler teams demonstrating basics of dog obedience and dog agility training that parallel that activities done in the Recovery & Care Canine-Assisted Therapy session that same week. Following the education and passive demonstration sessions, youth will be allowed to interact freely with the dog-handler teams. A brief mood questionnaire will be administered by research staff at the beginning and end of each session. Research staff will also be present during all sessions as observers and to record fidelity measures.
Baseline and Follow-up data will be collected up to 1-month before and 1-month after the intervention programs. Data collection for all subjects enrolled will be conducted by the University of Chicago Project staff, on site in the PI's lab at the University of Chicago or virtually.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Kristen Jacobson, PhD
- Phone Number: 773-834-0265
- Email: kjacobso@bsd.uchicago.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Jennifer A Ponting
- Phone Number: 773-702-8669
- Email: io-ura@uchicago.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
- Recruiting
- University of Chicago
-
Contact:
- Kristen C Jacobson, PhD
- Phone Number: 773-834-0265
- Email: kjacobson@bsd.uchicago.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Currently receiving outpatient mental health services at the University of Chicago or have received outpatient mental health services from the community in the last 12 months.
- Available for scheduling during the entire 6-week intervention program
- Interest in participating in the program
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe cognitive, psychiatric, or physical condition or limitation that would prevent participation.
- Severe animal allergy
- Animal phobia
- History of mistreatment of animals.
- Above-average scores on both measures of behavioral regulation and emotional regulation
- WASI t-score of intellectual ability < 60.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental
Active intervention.
Youth will be assigned to the active Recovery & Care Canine-Assisted Therapy intervention arm.
|
Active intervention.
An 6-week session of structured, goal-oriented activities where youth focus on mastering dog obedience and dog training skills.
Each session is 1 hour and 15 minutes in length and includes education, review of prior sessions, and specific skill-building activities.
Skill-building activities progress in complexity during the course of the 6-week curriculum.
|
|
Other: Active control
Active control intervention.
Youth will be assigned to the active Canine Education & Bonding arm.
|
Active control intervention.
An 6-week session of semi-structured activities.
Sessions are 45 minutes in length.
Youth in this condition engage in an educational component, passive observation of dog-training skills, and an active free-play session with the dog-handler teams.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Emotional Stroop
Time Frame: Up to 1-month post-intervention
|
Computer-Assisted task assessing affect regulation
|
Up to 1-month post-intervention
|
|
Change in Emotional Stroop
Time Frame: Change from baseline to up to 1-month post-intervention
|
Computer-Assisted task assessing affect regulation
|
Change from baseline to up to 1-month post-intervention
|
|
Flanker Task
Time Frame: Up to 1-month post-intervention
|
Computer-Assisted task assessing attention & inhibitory control
|
Up to 1-month post-intervention
|
|
Change in Flanker Task
Time Frame: Change from baseline to up to 1-month post-intervention
|
Computer-Assisted task assessing attention & inhibitory control
|
Change from baseline to up to 1-month post-intervention
|
|
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
Time Frame: Up to 1-month post-intervention
|
10-item self-report scale assessing self-esteem.
Higher scores are better outcomes
|
Up to 1-month post-intervention
|
|
Change in Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline to up to 1-month post-intervention
|
10-item self-report scale assessing self-esteem.
Higher scores are better outcomes
|
Change from baseline to up to 1-month post-intervention
|
|
Change in Negative Affect
Time Frame: Change from the beginning to the end of each of the 6 weekly intervention sessions
|
In addition to overall change in outcomes post intervention, we are also interested in whether each intervention session produces an immediate change in youth emotion.
We will assess negative affect using 5 self-report items on current mood from positive and negative affect scale.
Higher scores are worse outcomes.
|
Change from the beginning to the end of each of the 6 weekly intervention sessions
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pearson Social Skills Rating Scales -Positive social behaviors
Time Frame: Up to 1-month post-intervention
|
Self-report subscale assessing cooperation, empathy, assertion, self-control, and responsibility.
Higher scores are better outcomes.
|
Up to 1-month post-intervention
|
|
Change in Pearson Social Skills Rating Scales -Positive social behaviors
Time Frame: Change from baseline to up to 1-month post-intervention
|
Self-report subscale assessing cooperation, empathy, assertion, self-control, and responsibility.
Higher scores are better outcomes.
|
Change from baseline to up to 1-month post-intervention
|
|
Pearson Social Skills Rating Scales -Externalizing behaviors
Time Frame: Up to 1-month post-intervention
|
Self-report subscale assessing aggressive acts and poor temper control.
Higher scores are worse outcomes
|
Up to 1-month post-intervention
|
|
Change in Pearson Social Skills Rating Scales -Externalizing behaviors
Time Frame: Change from baseline to up to 1-month post-intervention
|
Self-report subscale assessing aggressive acts and poor temper control.
Higher scores are worse outcomes
|
Change from baseline to up to 1-month post-intervention
|
|
Attendance and Attrition
Time Frame: Aggregated across the 6-week intervention program
|
Project staff will record the number of absences and drop-outs for youth enrolled in both study intervention conditions.
|
Aggregated across the 6-week intervention program
|
|
Self-Regulation Child Report
Time Frame: Up to 1-month post-intervention
|
Behavioral and emotional regulation subscales from the BRIEF-2 instrument
|
Up to 1-month post-intervention
|
|
Self-Regulation Parent Report
Time Frame: Up to 1-month post-intervention
|
Behavioral and emotional regulation subscales from the BRIEF-2 instrument
|
Up to 1-month post-intervention
|
|
Change in Positive Affect
Time Frame: Change from the beginning to the end of each of the 6 weekly intervention session
|
In addition to overall change in outcomes post intervention, we are also interested in whether each intervention session produces an immediate change in youth emotion.
We will assess positive affect using 5 self-report items on current mood from positive and negative affect scale.
Higher scores are better outcomes.
|
Change from the beginning to the end of each of the 6 weekly intervention session
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB22-1218
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Emotion Regulation
-
VU University of AmsterdamUtrecht UniversityRecruiting
-
Douglas Mental Health University InstituteMcGill University; MedTeq; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council,... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Miami UniversityUniversity of California, RiversideWithdrawn
-
University Grenoble AlpsActive, not recruiting
-
University of CyprusUniversity of Crete; VU University of Amsterdam; Eotvos Lorand UniversityRecruiting
-
Miami UniversityUniversity of California, RiversideEnrolling by invitation
-
Babes-Bolyai UniversityThe Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation...CompletedEmotion RegulationRomania
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityMind and Life Institute, Hadley, MassachusettsCompletedEmotion RegulationUnited States
-
University of California, Los AngelesEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Recruiting
-
University of MiamiThe Children's Trust, Miami FLRecruiting
Clinical Trials on Recovery & Care Canine-Assisted Therapy
-
University of ChicagoCanine Therapy CorpsRecruiting
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesWithdrawnStroke | Parkinson's Disease | Muscle WeaknessUnited States
-
Islamabad Medical and Dental CollegeNot yet recruitingExternal Apical Root Resorption in Maxillary Canines During Orthodontic RetractionPakistan
-
University of BaselRecruitingMotivation | Alliance, TherapeuticSwitzerland
-
Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de RothschildInstitut La TeppeNot yet recruiting
-
Chinese University of Hong KongNot yet recruitingArtificial Intelligence Assistance in Endoscopy Recovery | AI ValidationHong Kong
-
University of California, Los AngelesRANDCompleted
-
University Hospital, GhentBioElectronics CorporationCompleted
-
Cygnet HealthcareTrack Clinic, FromeNot yet recruitingEmotionally Unstable Personality Disorder, Borderline TypeUnited Kingdom
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)Completed