rTMS and Steroid Joint Steroid Injection in Chronic Spinal Pain

April 2, 2024 updated by: Siobhan Schabrun, Lawson Health Research Institute

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined With Steroid Joint Injection for the Treatment of Chronic Spinal Pain: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Chronic spinal pain (CSP) is one of the most common chronic pain conditions globally. Steroid joint injections (SJI) are a routine treatment option for patients with CLBP that is recalcitrant to other treatments. However, SJI has been shown to have limited long-term efficacy with patients often requiring another injection within months to adequately control pain. One option to prolong the analgesic effects of SJI is to use a type of noninvasive brain stimulation called repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Previous studies have shown rTMS may be capable of providing long-term pain relief in patients with chronic back pain. However, the literature on rTMS in patients with CSP is limited and no study has explored rTMS in patients receiving recurrent SJI for pain control.

What is also unclear is the mechanisms through which rTMS might exert therapeutic effects on CSP. Systemic inflammation has been shown to have a key role in the initiation and maintenance of chronic pain, particularly through the actions of serum pro- and anti-inflammatory proteins.

In this pilot randomized controlled trial study, we'll be investigating if combining rTMS with SJI in CSP individuals will enhance or prolong the analgesic effects of SJI alone. We'll also be studying the relationship between specific pro- and anti-inflammatory proteins and rTMS/SJI treatment response.

The investigators hypothesize that a combined rTMS and SJI intervention will be feasible, tolerable, and safe and will have larger and longer-lasting effects on CSP than a sham rTMS and SJI intervention. Further, it is hypothesized that anti-inflammatory proteins, such as IL-4 and IL-9, will be upregulated, and pro-inflammatory proteins, such as IL-6, downregulated, relative to baseline, in response to the active rTMS and SJI intervention but not in response to the sham rTMS and SJI intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background:

Chronic spinal pain (CSP) is one of the most common health conditions globally. The pathophysiology of CSP is complex, and it is thought that a spectrum of peripheral and central mechanisms may be involved. (Baron et al., 2016) Steroid joint injections (SJI) are a routine therapeutic intervention for patients with CSP that is recalcitrant to other types of treatment. However, SJI has been shown to have limited long-term efficacy with patients requiring another injection within months to adequately control pain (Won et al., 2020). One option to prolong the analgesic effects of SJI may be to incorporate repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as an adjunct therapy. Studies have shown rTMS may be capable of providing long-term pain relief in patients with CSP (Ambriz-Tututi et al., 2016). However, the literature on rTMS in patients with CSP is limited and no study has explored rTMS in patients receiving concurrent SJI for pain control.

The mechanisms through which rTMS might exert therapeutic effects on CSP are unclear. Cytokine-mediated neuroinflammation has been shown to have a key role in the initiation and maintenance of chronic pain. Growing evidence suggests that this is in part due to sensitization of nociceptors following injury via upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin 6 (IL-6; Kawasaki et al., 2008). If prolonged or excessive, this sensitization may lead to changes in synaptic plasticity, contributing to chronic pain (Ji et al., 2002). Treatment success has been associated with the downregulation of these pro-inflammatory markers, and an upregulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin 4 (IL-4; Sandy-Hindmarch et al., 2021; Ohtori et al., 2012). Recently, interleukin 9 (IL-9) has also gained attention for its role in pain. Though limited, the available literature on this cytokine has shown it to have a pro-resolution role in chronic pain. (Sandy Hindmarch et al., 2021) However, no study has examined these inflammatory markers in association with rTMS treatment success.

Thus, the aims of this study are to determine: (1) the feasibility, tolerability, safety, and perceived patient response to a combined rTMS and SJI intervention, (2) whether rTMS combined with SJIs (active rTMS group) display trends towards greater benefits for pain and function than SJIs alone (sham rTMS group), and (3) the relationship between serum levels of cytokines IL-4, IL-6, and IL-9 and rTMS/SJI treatment response. We hypothesize that a combined rTMS and SJI intervention be feasible, tolerable, and safe and will show trends towards larger and longer-lasting effects on chronic spinal pain than a sham rTMS and SJI intervention. Further, we hypothesize that IL-4 and IL-9 will be upregulated, and IL-6 downregulated, relative to baseline, in response to the active rTMS and SJI intervention but not in response to the sham rTMS and SJI intervention. Serum levels of IL-4 and IL-9 will negatively correlate, and IL-6 positively correlate, with subjective ratings for pain throughout the study in the treatment and control group.

Study Design:

This pilot study is a randomized, participant- and assessor-blind controlled trial of active and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulations (rTMS) in a population of individuals with CSP, who are receiving recurrent SJIs at three- to six-month intervals through the St Joseph's Pain Clinic. The rTMS intervention will begin 1-4 weeks after SJI and include a 2-week induction phase with active or sham rTMS delivered 3 times each week. The purpose of the induction phase is to strengthen the effects of rTMS at the start of the treatment through multiple sessions in a relatively short period of time. A maintenance phase will follow and in weeks 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 participants will receive a single active or sham rTMS session. Pain severity will be assessed weekly using an electronic diary from baseline (the week of SJI until week 24). Disability and quality of life will be assessed at baseline, 4, 8, 12, 18 and 24 weeks. Blood will be drawn prior to the first rTMS session and in weeks 6 and 12.

Participants:

Forty adults (≥18 years old) with CSP who are currently receiving recurrent SJIs for control of CLBP at the St. Joseph's Health Centre Pain Clinic in London, Ontario, Canada will be recruited.

Sample Size:

This is a pilot randomized controlled study designed to generate data that can be used to inform a future large-scale trial should the intervention appear feasible, safe and show trends of effectiveness. Thus, the investigators have selected a sample size of 20 individuals per group for a total of 40 participants. A sample size of 40 participants was selected as this is considered achievable within the time frame allocated for the completion of the pilot study according to participant recruitment rates within the pain clinic. The aim is to evaluate key trial parameters, such as recruitment and retention of participants, randomization, the success of blinding, acceptability of the intervention, levels of missing data and preliminary indications of effectiveness, to inform the calculation of a sample size for powering a full trial.

Steroid Joint Injections (SJI):

SJI will be given by an interventional pain physician following the standard clinical procedure for the St. Joseph's Health Centre Pain Clinic. The treatment team will determine how many joints will be injected based on their standard clinical assessment.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS):

1-4 weeks after administration of the SJI, participants will attend their first rTMS session. rTMS will be delivered to the corticomotor representation of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle contralateral to the side of worst CSP. The hotspot and resting motor threshold (rMT) of the FDI will be determined and saved using a Brainsight Neuronavigation system to ensure accurate coil repositioning within and between sessions.

The hotspot and rMT will be confirmed and adjusted if needed at each intervention session. Each rTMS session will consist of 40 trains of 5s delivered at 10Hz, at an intensity of 85% of the rMT for the FDI muscle and an intertrain interval of 25s (total of 2000 stimulations in a 20-minute session). Sham rTMS will be delivered using a sham coil of identical colour, size, and shape as the active rTMS coil. The sham coil uses a magnetic shield that blocks the magnetic field from being delivered to the scalp while producing a similar auditory click during discharge. All other aspects of the rTMS protocol will be identical between the active and sham conditions.

Measures of Inflammatory Molecules:

Blood will be drawn at baseline, week 6, and week 12 to explore the association between inflammatory markers and treatment response. To avoid any interference with cytokine levels, all participants will be asked to fast overnight prior to the blood draw. Fasting includes refraining from food, alcohol, caffeine, and nicotine for 8-12 hours prior to the blood collection.

Confidentiality and Data Security:

All study data will be stored electronically on a password-protected, FireVault-encrypted, laptop in the office of the Principal Investigator. Access to study data and/or medical records will be limited to authorized study personnel only. A master log with identifiers will be stored separately from the study data.

The participant will be able to withdraw at any point during data collection. The data will be unable to be withdrawn once it has been pooled with other participants' data for statistical tests for the purposes of a paper or abstract however these data will be de-identified.

Statistical Analysis:

All statistical analyses will be carried out using the software R. Data for feasibility and safety will be analyzed using descriptive statistics. To determine trends of effectiveness, analyses of pain and disability will be performed according to intention-to-treat and per protocol using analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess change within groups and the differences between groups over time (pre/post). All data will be assessed for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Normally distributed data will be assessed using 2-way repeated measures of ANOVA with 2 levels for intervention (active rTMS/sham rTMS) and levels for time (0, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks) as separate factors. If significant group x time interactions are found, then Bonferroni post hoc tests will be used to determine which means are significantly different from one another. Non-parametric data will be assessed via a Mann-Whitney U test on change scores between groups. The effect size will be determined using partial η2 from planned contrasts. The size of the treatment effects will be used to determine whether it is worthwhile to conduct a full randomized controlled trial in the future. Given the pilot nature of this trial, missing data will not be replaced. Bonferroni post hoc tests will be applied if appropriate. The α will be set at 0.05 for all tests.

Results will be corrected for false discovery rate using Benjamini-Hochberg correction where an adjusted p-value of < 0.05 will be considered significant.

Spearman rank correlation coefficient will be determined to calculate the correlation between the scores obtained from the PNRS questionnaire and serum interleukin levels.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Currently receiving recurrent steroid joint injections for control of chronic spinal pain at the St. Joseph's Health Centre Pain Clinic in London, Ontario, Canada,
  • Have pain in the spinal region of an intensity ≥4 out of 10 in the week before your most recent steroid joint injection,
  • Have received at least 2 steroid joint injections within the last 12 months at regular intervals
  • Have had a consistent medication regimen for the past 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to read, understand, and speak English and are not able to give consent
  • Known or suspected serious spinal pathology (tumour, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis)
  • Spinal surgery in the past 12 months
  • History of uncontrolled mental health condition(s)
  • Have an inflammatory or autoimmune disease
  • Meet any specific rTMS-related exclusion criteria listed on the safety screening questionnaire (S1; Rossi et al., 2008).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: active repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation + steroid joint injection

Active transcranial stimulation will be delivered for a total of 11 sessions. Each session will consist of 40 trains of 5s delivered at 10 Hz, at an intensity of 85% of the resting motor threshold for the first dorsal interosseous muscle and an intertrain interval of 25s (total of 2000 stimulations in a 20-minute session).

The steroid joint injection will be given 1-4 week before rTMS begins. A dose of 0.5mL of 40mg/mL triamcinolone and 0.5mL of 2% lidocaine will be given per joint via spinal needle. The treatment team will determine how many joints will be injected based on their standard clinical assessment. Usually, about 2-4 joints are injected depending on a person's pain presentation. Standard practice is to place the needle in the region of the steroid joint opening, resulting in a peri- +/- intra-articular infusion of the injectate. This project will utilize standard clinical practice without modification.

1-4 weeks after administration of the SJI, participants will attend their first rTMS session. rTMS will be delivered using a biphasic stimulator (DuoMag) and a figure-of-eight coil to the corticomotor representation of the first dorsal interosseous muscle contralateral to the side of worst pain. Recording electrodes will be positioned in a belly-tendon montage over the FDI for electromyography recording. The hotspot and resting motor threshold (rMT) of the FDI will be determined and saved using a Brainsight Neuronavigation system to ensure accurate coil repositioning within and between sessions.

The hotspot and rMT will be confirmed and adjusted if needed at each intervention session. Each rTMS session will consist of 40 trains of 5s delivered at 10Hz, at an intensity of 85% of the resting motor threshold for the FDI muscle and an intertrain interval of 25s (total of 2000 stimulations in a 20-minute session).

Other Names:
  • rTMS
The steroid joint injection will be given 1-4 weeks ahead of active rTMS and sham rTMS commencement. A dose of 0.5mL of 40mg/mL triamcinolone and 0.5mL of 2% lidocaine will be given per joint via spinal needle. The treatment team will determine how many joints will be injected based on their standard clinical assessment. Usually, about 2-4 joints are injected depending on a person's pain presentation. Standard practice is to place the needle in the region of the facet joint opening, resulting in a peri- +/- intra-articular infusion of the injectate. This project will utilize standard clinical practice without modification.
Other Names:
  • SJI
Sham Comparator: sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation + steroid joint injection

The sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation coil will be delivered using a sham coil of identical colour, size, and shape as the active rTMS coil. The sham coil uses a magnetic shield that blocks the magnetic field from being delivered to the scalp while producing a similar auditory click during discharge. All other aspects of the rTMS protocol will be identical between the active and sham conditions.

The steroid joint injection will be given 1-4 week before sham rTMS begins and will also follow the same protocol as the active rTMS group.

Sham intervention will follow same protocol as active rTMS using a sham coil that does not deliver actual magnetic stimulation.
Other Names:
  • sham rTMS
The steroid joint injection will be given 1-4 weeks ahead of active rTMS and sham rTMS commencement. A dose of 0.5mL of 40mg/mL triamcinolone and 0.5mL of 2% lidocaine will be given per joint via spinal needle. The treatment team will determine how many joints will be injected based on their standard clinical assessment. Usually, about 2-4 joints are injected depending on a person's pain presentation. Standard practice is to place the needle in the region of the facet joint opening, resulting in a peri- +/- intra-articular infusion of the injectate. This project will utilize standard clinical practice without modification.
Other Names:
  • SJI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measures of feasibility and tolerability
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 24 weeks
Data for feasibility, tolerability, and safety will be analyzed using descriptive statistics. Feasibility and tolerability will be measured as (1) the time taken to complete the recruitment of 40 participants, (2) the number of sessions attended by each participant, (3) the number of dropouts in each group, (4) the proportion of participants recruited from the total number screened, and (5) the willingness of each participant to undergo therapy on an 11-point numerical rating scale with 'not at all willing' at 0 and 'very willing' at 10 (measured at baseline).
Through study completion, an average of 24 weeks
Measures for safety
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 24 weeks
Safety will be presented as any adverse reaction reported on verbal questioning at each session. The assessor will record a description of any adverse reactions along with the severity, duration and how the adverse reaction was managed. The number of participants reporting adverse reactions, and the duration and severity of the adverse reactions will be reported.
Through study completion, an average of 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Numeric Rating Scale
Time Frame: Weeks 1 through 24
Pain severity will be assessed at baseline and weekly until week 24 using the 11-point Pain Numeric Rating Scale.
Weeks 1 through 24
Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF)
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24
Pain severity and the impact of pain on the patient's daily functioning will be assessed using the 9-item, Brief Pain Inventory short form at baseline, weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24
12-Item Short Form (SF-12)
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24
The 12-item short form (SF-12) will be used to assess the quality of life and will be taken at baseline, weeks 4, 12 and 24.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24
Disability will be assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at baseline, weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24. The 12-item short form (SF-12) will be used to assess the quality of life and will be taken at baseline, weeks 4, 12 and 24. Finally, as rTMS has previously been shown to positively affect depression and anxiety symptoms, the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) will be used to monitor any potential effects our rTMS treatment has on mood. This will be administered at weeks 4, 12, and 24.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24
Global Rating of Change Scale (GRC)
Time Frame: Weeks 4 - 24
A 15-point GRC, with -7 "a very great deal worse", 0 "about the same", to 7 "a very great deal better", will be administered to assess participants' perception of symptom improvement or worsening in response to treatment. The GRC will be administered in weeks 4, 12 and 24.
Weeks 4 - 24
Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21)
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24
As rTMS has previously been shown to positively affect depression and anxiety symptoms, the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) will be used to monitor any potential effects our rTMS treatment has on mood. This will be administered at weeks 4, 12, and 24.
Weeks 4, 12, 24
Measures of Inflammatory Markers
Time Frame: Weeks 1, 6, 12
Blood will be drawn at baseline, week 6, and week 12 to explore the association between inflammatory markers and treatment response. Serum concentration of interleukins IL-4 and IL-6 will be quantified using a 32x3 simple plex multianalyte cartridge for the Ella automated immunoassay system (ProteinSimple, San Jose, California). Quantification of serum IL-9 will be performed in triplicate via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ThermoFisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA). Samples will be prepared and loaded into the cartridge for measurement according to standard instructions provided by the manufacturers.
Weeks 1, 6, 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Siobhan Schabrun, Lawson Health Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 20, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Spinal Pain

Clinical Trials on sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

3
Subscribe