Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: "Placental-maternal Crosstalk and Future Health" (GaP)

May 22, 2023 updated by: Meryam Sugulle, Oslo University Hospital

The GaP Study: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: "Placental-maternal Crosstalk and Future Health

The GaP study is designed to close important knowledge gaps by:

  1. exploring placental health and cellular ageing in GDM and the association with neonatal outcome
  2. evaluating the effectiveness of current and novel maternal health follow-up strategies after GDM

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

The incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing. GDM has potential adverse short and long term health effects for both the women and her offspring, and involves dysfunctional interaction between placenta and the maternal body. The burden for the individual, the health system and society warrants further investigations into the placental-maternal crosstalk in GDM in order to improve personalized pregnancy surveillance and follow-up. In Oslo county, nearly twice as many women who give birth suffer from GDM (5.7%) than from preeclampsia (2.3%). The large obstetric department at Ullevål provides an optimal environment for novel translational studies and clinical practical aspects of GDM. The GaP study is designed to close important knowledge gaps by:

  1. exploring placental health and cellular ageing in GDM and the association with neonatal outcome
  2. evaluating the effectiveness of current and novel maternal health follow-up strategies after GDM

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

350

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Oslo, Norway, 0407
        • Oslo University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Pregnant women with GDM (diagnosed according to guidelines and referred to our outpatient clinic) and healthy, euglycemic pregnant women (Control group: referred for breech evaluation, planning of elective cesarean section, suspected reduced or increased fetal growth with a normal finding at ultrasound). Patients can be recruited from outpatient clinic, prior to induction, at admission for elective cesaerean section or at admission for labor (but not yet in active labor)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women >18 years with GDM giving birth at Oslo University hospital Ullevål.
  • Control group of gestational age matched euglycemic, normotensive pregnancies

Exclusion Criteria:

  • reduced fetal movements,
  • epilepsy
  • thyroidea dysfunction
  • hypertensive disorder of pregnancy
  • non-communicable disease
  • Communicable disease (such as HIV)
  • type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
  • not able to understand Norwegian or English.
  • under legal guardianship.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Women with gestational diabetes
Any treatment. N=200.
Control group
Gestational-age matched, euglycemic, normotensive pregnant women (n=150)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of women with altered levels of circulating senescence markers
Time Frame: 4 years
Levels of maternal circulating senescence markers, e.g. SAA1, free thiol and related markers, in case group compared to controls
4 years
Number of women with altered levels of tissue-based senescence markers
Time Frame: 4 years
Expression of markers of senescence in placental tissue, as assesed by immunohistochemistry (e.g. IL-6, p21, p16 and related markers) in case group compared to controls
4 years
Number of women with increased values for postpartum surrogate markers for impaired cardiovascular function
Time Frame: 4 years
As assessed by circulating maternal levels of cardiovascular biomarkers, e.g. HDL (mmol/l), LDL (mmol/l) and related markers in case group compared to controls
4 years
Number of women with increased values for postpartum surrogate markers for impaired cardiovascular function
Time Frame: 4 years
As assessed by circulating maternal levels of cardiovascular biomarkers, e.g. GDF-15 (ng/l), NT-pro BNP (ng/l), Troponin (ng/l) and related markers in case group compared to controls
4 years
Number of neonates with adverse neonatal outcome
Time Frame: 4 years
A composite measure for neonatal outcome will be created using information on fetal acidemia, Apgar-score, asphyxia, intra-/postpartum fetal death, neonatal intubation/mechanical ventilation, meconium aspiration syndrome, netonatal hypoxic-ishcemic encephalopathy, therapeutic hypothermia of the neonate, rate of acute cesarean section (due to suspected fetal distress) and compared in case group and controls
4 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with operative vaginal delivery due to suspected fetal distress
Time Frame: 4 years
Rates of operative vaginal deliveries (forceps/vacuum/combined; due to suspected fetal distress) in case and control groups
4 years
Percentage of participants with pathological placenta histology findings in case and control groups
Time Frame: 4 years
As assessed by a senior perinatal pathologist using predefined criteria
4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Meryam Sugulle, PhD, Oslo University Hospital, Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Ullevål

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Depending on when the permission for the dataset usage for the project's outcome measures ends (OUH personal data officer/Regional Ethical Comittee) AND Norwegian legislation regarding personal data protection. It is unlikely that a major part of the data set will be shared openly due to these restrictions on sensitive personal data matters.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe