- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05961774
The Investigation of Underlying Mechanism of Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Activation Deficits
The Investigation of Underlying Mechanism of Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Activation Deficits in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate mechanism underlying lumbar multifidus muscle (LM) activation deficits in adults with chronic low back pain (CLBP). The main questions it aim to answer is whether motor cortex or muscular level is the underlying mechanism responsible for the LM activation deficits.
Participants will:
- Undergo cortical excitability measurement using transcranial magnetic stimulation, LM activation measurement using ultrasound imaging, and force measurement using hand-held dynamometer.
- Be randomly assigned to either repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)
- Undergo all measurement at post-intervention Researchers will compare within and between groups to see changes in cortical excitability, LM activation, and force.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Procedure The study will use a sample of convenience. The subject with CLBP will be recruited by the flyers posted at physical therapy clinic, as well as words of mouths. The participants who are interested in the study will undergo screening process for eligibility using the inclusion-exclusion criteria checklist. If the participants meet the eligibility criteria, participants will receive the brief information of the study and the consent process will be performed.
After receiving the informed consents, all participants will be requested to fill out the information sheet for demographic and clinical data. The participants will be asked to change the cloth of the top to be able to expose the lower back region. After collecting demographic and clinical data, 3-condition of LM thickness and cross-sectional area will be measured including 1) resting condition (Rest), maximum voluntary isometric contraction condition (MVIC), and maximum voluntary isometric contraction combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (COMB). The landmarks will be identified while the participants lay down in prone position. The landmarks include 1) lumbar spinous process of L2-L5 and 2) L4-5 facet joint (2 cm lateral to lower half of spinous process of L4). Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) will be used to measure LM activation and hand-held dynamometer will be used to measure force in this study across 3 conditions.
The participant will have 10 minutes rest before the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). A pair of surface electrodes (Ag/AgCl, 10 mm) will be place according to SENIAM recommendation. The common ground electrode will be placed at the iliac crest. Two surface EMG electrodes will be placed relative to L4-5 along with the line joining from posterosuperior iliac spine and L1-L2 vertebral interspace (24) on the side of pain. The researcher will determine the hotspot of lumbar multifidus muscle area on the brain. The hotspot of the LM will be determined by least intensity of TMS which at least elicits 50 percent of measurable motor evoked potential (MEP) and this intensity will be the active motor threshold (AMT) of the participants. After the AMT is achieved, the 120% of AMT will be used as the intensity to induce the MEP. The MEP will be used to represent cortical excitability.
After the baseline RUSI and TMS data collection, the participants will be randomly assigned in to 2 groups include 1) NMES and high-frequency repetitive TMS (HF-rTMS) group. For HF-rTMS group, the participants will be in sitting position feet placed firmly on the floor. The stimulation point is the LM hot spot which is pre-determined by single pulse TMS as aforementioned. The HF-rTMS will be applied for participant individually. According to the theory, HF-rTMS results in facilitation of the targeted area; therefore, it will increase the excitability of the LM hot spot and potentially increase LM's neural drive and activation. The parameters will be set at frequency 10 Hz, 50 number of pulses, 40 train of stimulation (5 seconds stimulation and 25 seconds inter-stimulation interval) (34). The stimulation will approximately 20 minutes. The position of coil will be placed tangentially at 45 degrees on the LM hotspot. For the neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) group, participants will be lying in prone position. The landmarks and electrodes placements are the same as mentioned in MVIC combined with NMES and LM thickness measurement. NMES parameters are interferential current 6000 Hz, amplitude 20-50 Hz with scanning mode, duration 20-minute, intensity to elicit the LM contraction (6). After the participants completed receiving the stimulation, the participant will undergo the collecting the LM thickness and force again using the same protocol.
Data will be used to 1) identify changes in cortical excitability, LM activation and force before and after stimulation at cortical level by HF-rTMS, 2) identify changes in cortical excitability, LM activation and force before and after stimulation at muscular level by NMES, and 3) compare the percent changes in cortical excitability, LM activation and force between stimulation at cortical (by HF-rTMS) and muscular (by NMES) levels.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Nakhon Pathom
-
Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand, 73170
- Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male and female age between 18 and 40 years.
- Experience of low back pain at least 3 months, or recurrent of back pain for at least two episodes in 6 months that interferes with activities of daily living.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis, spine tumor and malignancy
- Radiculopathy or myelopathy
- History of lumbar or abdominal surgery
- Pregnancy
- Neurological Disease (e.g., stroke, Parkinson, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury)
- Major cardiovascular diseases (e.g., heart failure, coronary artery diseases, angina pain)
- Skin lesion (e.g., skin laceration) on site of stimulation.
- Experience of lumbar motor control exercise more than or equal to 2 weeks
- Metal implantation sensitive to magnetic field, or cardiac implantations
- BMI greater or equal to 30 kg/m2
- Taking any medications that would interfere with brain stimulation (e.g., Calcium channel blockers, Na+ channel blocker, NMDA antagonist, Glutamate receptor antagonist, nicotine uptake)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: High frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
This group will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
|
The stimulation point is the lumbar multifidus hotspot.
The parameters will be set at frequency 10 Hz, 50 number of pulses, 40 train of stimulation (5 seconds stimulation and 25 seconds inter-stimulation interval).
The position of coil will be placed tangentially at 45 degrees on the LM hotspot.
The stimulation will be 20 minutes.
|
|
Active Comparator: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation
This group will receive neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
|
The neuromuscular electrical stimulation will be set as interferential current 6000 Hz, amplitude 20-50 Hz with scanning mode, duration 20 minutes, intensity to elicit the LM contraction.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Resting motor threshold
Time Frame: Change from baseline after 1 session
|
The stimulus intensity that causes a minimum motor response in a resting muscle during single transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses applied over the motor hotspot.
|
Change from baseline after 1 session
|
|
Active motor threshold
Time Frame: Change from baseline after 1 session
|
The lowest stimulus intensity to elicit a motor evoked potential ≥ 200μV in 5 out of 10 consecutive trials during an isometric contraction of 10% maximum voluntary contraction in the target muscle.
|
Change from baseline after 1 session
|
|
Motor evoked potential
Time Frame: Change from baseline after 1 session
|
The electrical signals recorded from the descending motor pathways or from muscles following stimulation of motor pathways within the brain.
|
Change from baseline after 1 session
|
|
Cortical silent period
Time Frame: Change from baseline after 1 session
|
The temporary interruption of electromyographic signal from a muscle following a motor evoked potential triggered by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex.
|
Change from baseline after 1 session
|
|
Muscle thickness
Time Frame: Change from baseline after 1 session
|
Muscle contractility.
|
Change from baseline after 1 session
|
|
Muscle cross-sectional area
Time Frame: Change from baseline after 1 session
|
Cross-sectional area can be related to joint torque production and isokinetic strength in different muscle groups.
|
Change from baseline after 1 session
|
|
Muscle pennation angle
Time Frame: Change from baseline after 1 session
|
Pennation angle can represent the maximum force developed by a muscle
|
Change from baseline after 1 session
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Force generation
Time Frame: Change from baseline after 1 session
|
Hand-held dynamometer will be used to measure muscle force.
|
Change from baseline after 1 session
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Peemongkon Wattananon, PhD, Mahidol University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- O'Connell NE, Wand BM, Marston L, Spencer S, Desouza LH. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 11;(4):CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub3.
- Hodges PW, Danneels L. Changes in Structure and Function of the Back Muscles in Low Back Pain: Different Time Points, Observations, and Mechanisms. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Jun;49(6):464-476. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8827.
- Wattananon P, Sungnak P, Songjaroen S, Kantha P, Hsu WL, Wang HK. Using neuromuscular electrical stimulation in conjunction with ultrasound imaging technique to investigate lumbar multifidus muscle activation deficit. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020 Dec;50:102215. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102215. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
- Masse-Alarie H, Beaulieu LD, Preuss R, Schneider C. Corticomotor control of lumbar multifidus muscles is impaired in chronic low back pain: concurrent evidence from ultrasound imaging and double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res. 2016 Apr;234(4):1033-45. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4528-x. Epub 2015 Dec 26.
- Songjaroen S, Sungnak P, Piriyaprasarth P, Wang HK, Laskin JJ, Wattananon P. Combined neuromuscular electrical stimulation with motor control exercise can improve lumbar multifidus activation in individuals with recurrent low back pain. Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 20;11(1):14815. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94402-2.
- Strutton PH, Theodorou S, Catley M, McGregor AH, Davey NJ. Corticospinal excitability in patients with chronic low back pain. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005 Oct;18(5):420-4. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000169063.84628.fe.
- Tsao H, Danneels LA, Hodges PW. ISSLS prize winner: Smudging the motor brain in young adults with recurrent low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21):1721-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821c4267.
- van Dieen JH, Reeves NP, Kawchuk G, van Dillen LR, Hodges PW. Motor Control Changes in Low Back Pain: Divergence in Presentations and Mechanisms. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Jun;49(6):370-379. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.7917. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
- Wallwork TL, Stanton WR, Freke M, Hides JA. The effect of chronic low back pain on size and contraction of the lumbar multifidus muscle. Man Ther. 2009 Oct;14(5):496-500. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.09.006. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
- Wand BM, Parkitny L, O'Connell NE, Luomajoki H, McAuley JH, Thacker M, Moseley GL. Cortical changes in chronic low back pain: current state of the art and implications for clinical practice. Man Ther. 2011 Feb;16(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.06.008. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
- Masse-Alarie H, Beaulieu LD, Preuss R, Schneider C. The side of chronic low back pain matters: evidence from the primary motor cortex excitability and the postural adjustments of multifidi muscles. Exp Brain Res. 2017 Mar;235(3):647-659. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4834-y. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
- Patricio P, Roy JS, Macedo L, Roy M, Leonard G, Hodges P, Masse-Alarie H. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation alone and in combination with motor control exercise for the treatment of individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain (ExTraStim trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 24;11(3):e045504. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045504.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MU-CIRB 2023/027.1503
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterCompletedLower Back Pain | Low Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, Recurrent | Low Back Pain, Postural | Postural Low Back Pain | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Low Back Ache | Recurrent Low Back Pain | Lower Back Pain Chronic | Low Back Pain, Posterior Compartment | Low BackacheUnited States
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de...CompletedLow Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, Postural | Lower Back Pain Chronic | Low Back Pain, Posterior CompartmentBrazil
-
Istanbul UniversityIstinye UniversityCompletedLow Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, Recurrent | Low Back Pain, PosturalTurkey
-
University School of Physical Education in WroclawCompletedLow Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, PosturalPoland
-
General Incorporated Foundation Ryukyuseimeisaiseikai...CompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Non-specific Low Back Pain | Low Back Pain (LBP)Japan
-
Texas Woman's UniversityTexas Physical Therapy AssociationCompletedLow Back Pain | Chronic Low Back Pain | Subacute Low Back PainUnited States
-
University of ParmaKing's College London; Helmholtz Zentrum München; GENOS; Ip Research Consulting... and other collaboratorsUnknownChronic Low Back Pain | Acute Low Back PainUnited States, Australia, Belgium, Croatia, Italy, United Kingdom
-
Pamukkale UniversityCompletedLow Back Disorder | Low Back Pain (LBP)Turkey
-
MMJ Labs LLCNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Sport and Spine Rehab Clinical Research...CompletedChronic Low-back Pain | Pain, Intractable | Acute Low-back PainUnited States
Clinical Trials on Transcranial magnetic stimulation
-
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical...Completed
-
Russian Academy of Medical SciencesCompletedStrokeRussian Federation
-
MGH Institute of Health ProfessionsNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)Recruiting
-
State University of New York - Upstate Medical...RecruitingHeadache | Brain Concussion | Mild Traumatic Brain Injury | Post-Concussion SymptomsUnited States
-
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal...Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)Active, not recruitingMajor Depressive DisorderCanada
-
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedHealthy VolunteersUnited States
-
University of ManitobaManitoba Medical Service FoundationSuspendedObsessive Compulsive DisorderCanada
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)Completed
-
The University of Hong KongNot yet recruiting
-
Aalborg UniversityCompletedAerobic Exercise | Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)Denmark