A Delphi Survey for Key Stakeholders to Identify Priority Self-management Outcomes for Chronic Kidney Disease

April 9, 2026 updated by: University of Leicester

Taking an Active Role in Your Own Healthcare: A Delphi Survey for Key Stakeholders to Identify Priority Self-management Outcomes for Chronic Kidney Disease (SM-CKD Delphi Study)

The purpose of this Delphi study is to identify priority outcomes for self-management in earlier (non-dialysis) stages of CKD from the perspectives of different stakeholder groups in the UK. The findings of this study will be used to inform outcome measure selection for research and clinical evaluations of self-management resources and to support implementation, commissioning and uptake.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a progressive condition affecting more than 1.8 million people in England

Effective self-management is important for people living with CKD like many Long-Term Conditions. Self-management in its broadest term can be summarised as individuals participating in the day-to-day management of their chronic condition

Theory- and evidence-based tools and resources for self-management education and support are required to encourage health-promoting behaviours. However, outcomes valued by key stakeholders are necessary to ensure robust evaluation in research settings and clinical practice

A Delphi study is carried out to generate consensus on outcomes that are valued by the stakeholder groups in this study. The Delphi study will undergo 3-4 survey rounds

Adult CKD patient participants living in the UK and their significant others were recruited via social media adverts shared by our research team and English kidney community organisations. Healthcare professionals, commissioners and policymakers (professional groups) based in the UK were recruited by direct email invitations to our extensive contacts in the field

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

140

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leicester, United Kingdom, LE1 7RH
        • University of Leicester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

  1. People living with CKD. This survey focusses on people with non-dialysis CKD, typically stages 3-4. However, we will not exclude participation by those at a more advanced stage or receiving renal replacement therapy (dialysis or transplant) as these people also have lived experience of earlier stages to draw on.
  2. Carers and Supporters of people with CKD (expected to be a significant other i.e. spouse or partner, close family member or friend that are involved in the regular care and support to a person living with CKD)
  3. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) who look after people with CKD in the UK
  4. Anyone involved in designing, developing, managing and commissioning of CKD healthcare in the UK
  5. Researchers interested in self-management or CKD

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • People with diagnosis of CKD in the UK
  • Their close family and friend
  • Healthcare professionals who look after people with CKD in the UK
  • Anyone involved in designing, developing, managing and commissioning CKD healthcare services in the UK
  • Researchers related in a topic related to self-management or CKD

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any participant residing outside of the UK

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Cohort 1: Professional Expert
This includes Healthcare professionals (HCPs) who look after people with CKD in the UK, anyone involved in designing, developing, managing and commissioning of CKD healthcare in the UK and researchers interested in self-management or CKD
Multiple survey rounds identifying most important outcomes for effective self-management for non-dialysis CKD
Cohort 2: Non-Professional Expert
This stakeholder group comprised individuals living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and informal caregivers (e.g., family members or significant others). Caregivers were not analyzed as a separate study arm due to the small number enrolled and overlap in roles, as some participants with CKD also identified as caregivers. For analytic purposes, responses were therefore combined into a single pre-specified stakeholder category representing lay or non-professional expertise. This combined reporting approach reflects established methodology in CKD Delphi studies, including those conducted by the Standardised Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG) initiative. This grouping does not represent an additional intervention or control arm, but rather a stakeholder classification used solely for descriptive and consensus analyses.
Multiple survey rounds identifying most important outcomes for effective self-management for non-dialysis CKD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Open Ended Free Text Question (Identifying Stakeholder Views on the 3 Most Important Outcomes for Self-management)
Time Frame: Between 3 to 6 month
Round 1- Participants are asked to describe the 3 most important outcomes for self-management in people with non-dialysis CKD from their own perspective or opinion
Between 3 to 6 month
Consensus Rating (Rating Each Item for Importance)
Time Frame: Between 3 to 6 month

Round 2- Participants are asked to rate each item on a 9 point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 (not important) to 9 (critically important). Higher scores indicate greater perceived importance of the item.

Items were analysed individually; no total or subscale scores were calculated. For each item, the distribution of ratings and mean score were computed.

Consensus was predefined as at least 70% of participants rating an item between 7 and 9 (critical importance), or a mean score of ≥7. Items not meeting this threshold were removed in subsequent Delphi rounds.

Between 3 to 6 month
Consensus Ranking (Ranking Items to Identify Top 3 Items)
Time Frame: Between 3 to 6 month
Round 3- Participants are asked to rank each item and themes in order from high to low importance to identify the most valued outcomes
Between 3 to 6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 3, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

April 3, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Kidney Diseases

Clinical Trials on Other: Survey

Subscribe