Analysis of Calcium Score of Severe Aortic Stenosis in Patients With and Without Cardiac Amyloidosis (CAUSATIVE Study) (CAUSATIVE)

September 27, 2023 updated by: Matteo Serenelli, University Hospital of Ferrara

Analysis of Calcium Score Values of Severe Aortic Stenosis in Patients With and Without Cardiac Amyloidosis (CAUSATIVE Study)

The concomitant presence of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) may challenge the estimation of stenosis degree. In patients with dual pathology (AS + CA) the most frequent AS hemodynamic profile is paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient AS.

In this setting, estimating stenosis degree with cardiac ultrasound may be challenging and aortic valve calcium score estimation by cardiac CT is a valuable exam.

Preliminary findings from small case series showed that patients with severe AS and CA presented less valvular calcium deposition compared to patients with severe AS alone. On this basis, confirmation of these findings would have a huge clinical impact on diagnosis, choice of treatment strategy and understanding of the pathophysiology of these patients.

The aim of the study is to study the correlation between valvular calcium score (assessed by EKG-gated CT) and effective orifice area (assessed through echocardiogram) according to cardiac amyloidosis presence (in the overall population and among hemodynamic phenotypes of cardiac amyloidosis).

As secondary endpoints the study will sought to assess TAVI/SAVR efficacy, procedural complications, in-hospital mortality, all-cause death and heart failure hospitalization at 1 year, according to absence or presence of CA.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular pathology in the elderly population, and there is an anticipated increase in prevalence and associated costs for treating this condition in the future. In a non-negligible percentage of cases (approximately 15%), another pathology is associated, namely cardiac amyloidosis, especially in the wild-type ATTR form. Patients with both pathologies (AS+ATTR) have a worse prognosis compared to those with AS alone. Based on the available data up to now, ATTR-associated amyloidotic cardiomyopathy does not appear to significantly influence the immediate outcome of TAVI or short-term outcomes. However, among patients with amyloidosis, there is an increased frequency of heart failure in subsequent follow-ups. The mechanism behind this dual pathology remains unclear. Epidemiological similarities (advanced age) alone do not explain the association. It is possible that there is a direct causal link between amyloidosis and aortic stenosis (amyloidosis as a co-cause or contributing factor to valvular stenosis), or that the elevated intramyocardial strain due to degenerative valvular stenosis promotes amyloidogenesis and myocardial infiltration. Understanding the extent of valvular calcifications in individual cases would provide better insights into the pathogenesis of this dual pathology. There are also diagnostic implications. Amyloidosis could potentially complicate the accurate classification of the severity of aortic pathology. For example, patients with AS+ATTR often exhibit a "low-flow low-gradient" paradoxical hemodynamic profile. In these cases, estimating the valve area with an echocardiogram is challenging, and evaluating the valvular calcium score through CT assumes an important diagnostic role. Preliminary studies suggest that, for the same degree of stenosis severity, there may be a lower quantity of calcium in the valves of patients with AS+ATTR compared to those with AS alone. Preliminary studies suggest that, for the same degree of stenosis severity, there may be a lower quantity of calcium in the valves of patients with AS+ATTR compared to those with AS alone. In a 1:1 propensity matching of over 300 patients (mostly without aortic stenosis), those with amyloidosis had lower aortic valvular calcium scores (p<0.01). In a small series of 13 cases with AS+ATTR, 12 had aortic valvular calcium scores below the severity cut-offs recommended by the guidelines. If confirmed, traditionally used calcium score cut-offs may be inadequate, with significant implications for treatment selection and therefore prognosis.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

480

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Ferrara, Italy, 44124
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Of Ferrara
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Group 1 "DUAL PATHOLOGY"

  • Age >65 years
  • Severe aortic stenosis at echocardiographic examination
  • TAVI o SAVR planned or already undergone TAVI/SAVR
  • ECG-gated cardiac CT and echocardiographic examinations available before TAVI/SAVR
  • Cardiac uptake at bone tracer scintigraphy with a Perugini score of 2 or 3.

Group 2 "CONTROL GROUP"

  • Age >65 years
  • Severe aortic stenosis at echocardiographic examination
  • TAVI o SAVR planned or already undergone TAVI/SAVR
  • ECG-gated cardiac CT and echocardiographic examinations available before TAVI/SAVR
  • patients with no cardiac uptake at scintigraphy with bone tracer.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • signed informed consent
  • age ≥65 years old
  • severe AS
  • planned or performed TAVI/SAVR
  • at least one red-flag suggestive of CA
  • availability of EKG-gated CT
  • availability of echocardiogram performed before TAVI/SAVR
  • availability of bone scintigraphy performed within 1 year from CT

Exclusion Criteria:

• suboptimal acoustic window that may undermine the assessment of AS severity and phenotype profiling

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Group 1 - "Dual Pathology"
  • Age >65 years
  • Severe aortic stenosis at echocardiographic examination
  • TAVI o SAVR planned or already undergone TAVI/SAVR
  • ECG-gated cardiac CT and echocardiographic examinations available before TAVI/SAVR
  • Cardiac uptake at bone tracer scintigraphy with a Perugini score of 2 or 3.
Group 2- "Control Group"
  • Age >65 years
  • Severe aortic stenosis at echocardiographic examination
  • TAVI o SAVR planned or already undergone TAVI/SAVR
  • ECG-gated cardiac CT and echocardiographic examinations available before TAVI/SAVR
  • Patients with no cardiac uptake at scintigraphy with bone tracer.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between valvular calcium score and effective orifice area.
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Correlation between valvular calcium score (assessed by EKG-gated CT) and effective orifice area (assessed through echocardiogram) according to cardiac amyloidosis presence (in the overall population and among hemodynamic phenotypes of cardiac amyloidosis).
Up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
TAVI/SAVR efficacy
Time Frame: At time of post-procedural echocardiographic assessment (through study completion, an average of 1 month)
Echocardiographic mean and maximal aortic gradient (mmHg) will be assessed.
At time of post-procedural echocardiographic assessment (through study completion, an average of 1 month)
TAVI/SAVR efficacy
Time Frame: At time of post-procedural echocardiographic assessment (through study completion, an average of 1 month)
Echocardiographic effective orifice valvular area (EROA) will be assessed and reported in cm2.
At time of post-procedural echocardiographic assessment (through study completion, an average of 1 month)
Procedural Complications
Time Frame: At an average of 12 months
Procedural complications will be assessed as per VARC definitions
At an average of 12 months
In-hospital Mortality
Time Frame: At an average of 12 months
In-hospital Mortality will be assessed from hospital records
At an average of 12 months
All-cause Mortality and Heart Failure Hospitalization
Time Frame: At an average of 12 months
The composite of all-cause Mortality and Heart Failure Hospitalization will be assessed through clinical follow-up, hospital records, and telephone follow-up.
At an average of 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matteo Serenelli, Doctor, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The data will be available from the principal investigator on reasonable request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Stenosis, Severe

Subscribe