Patient Centered Machine Learning Model for Bleeding and Ischemic Risk (xDAPT)

October 13, 2023 updated by: Abbott Medical Devices

Predicting Ischemic and Bleeding Risk In Patients On Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Individualized Patient Centered Machine Learning Model

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is indicated in all patients undergoing coronary stent implantation to prevent ischemic recurrencies despite an increased risk of bleeding. Accordingly, clinical practice guidelines advocate tailoring DAPT duration according to the patient's individual ischemic and bleeding risk profile.

Data from 11 clinical trials involving patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with an everolimus-eluting stent will be pooled and analyzed to develop a machine learning-based algorithm to predict the probability of an ischemic or bleeding event up to 1 year. These predictive risk models aim to support clinical decision-making on DAPT management after PCI.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is the standard of care for secondary prevention after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). DAPT has demonstrated its efficacy in reducing ischemic complications (including stent thrombosis) after PCI although at the cost of an increased risk of bleeding. As both event types have been independently linked with excess morbidity and mortality, international guidelines emphasize the need to tailor DAPT duration and intensity according to the individual ischemic and bleeding risk profile of each patient. In this context, several predictive risk models for bleeding and thrombosis have been developed with the aim of guiding clinical decisions on DAPT management post-PCI. However, many of these risk models have shown only modest performance and limited applicability in real-world clinical practice. Such limitations can be attributed, at least in part, to the analytical approaches used for their development, mostly based on linear models unable to capture the complex interplay between different clinical covariates. Machine learning methods offer the potential to overcome these limitations by leveraging computer algorithms to large datasets that capture high-dimensional, non-linear relationships among variables. However, the feasibility and usefulness of machine learning-based prognostic risk models in PCI patients remain relatively unexplored.

The present study will analyze data from 11 clinical trials encompassing approximately 19,000 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with an everolimus-eluting stent to develop a machine learning-based algorithm. Institutional review board approval or informed patient consent was not required as this study is an analysis of previously published clinical trials and all individual patient data were deidentified. The goal is to predict the probability of an ischemic or bleeding event up to 1 year after PCI. Patient-level data from the eligible clinical trials listed per the XIENCE Machine Learning Data Acquisition Protocol (90961902) will be pooled and randomly split into a training cohort (~75%) and a validation cohort (~25%). These include both Abbott- sponsored and investigator-initiated XIENCE studies (i.e., XIENCE V, XIENCE 28 USA, XIENCE 28 GLOBAL, XIENCE 90, ABSORB III, ABSORB IV, Compare ABSORB, Compare Acute, EXAMINATION, SIERRA-75 and ITALIC). The performance of different trials of machine learning classifiers will be compared with traditional statistical approaches for the prediction of ischemic and bleeding outcomes. The best-performing machine learning model will then be selected and tested against a pre-defined performance goal to assess its clinical usefulness. Based on existing literature on established risk scores that currently inform clinical practice, the performance goal for the model is set at C-index value equal or greater than 0.65 at the 97.5% lower confidence interval of the bootstrap C-index distribution. This is to ensure that the true value of the C-index is still within a clinically relevant range and to validate the clinical usefulness of the risk prediction model.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

19000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with an everolimus-eluting stent who were enrolled in one of the 11 XIENCE clinical trials, including the XIENCE V, XIENCE 28 USA, XIENCE 28 USA Global, XIENCE 90, ABSORB III, ABSORB IV, Compare ABSORB, Compare Acute, EXAMINATION, SIERRA-75 and ITALIC. The combined pooled dataset will be randomly split into a training cohort (~75%) and a validation cohort (~25%).

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Subject must be at least 18 years of age
  • Subject must provide informed consent to participate in the XIENCE study
  • Subject underwent PCI with the XIENCE stent

Exclusion criteria:

• none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Ischemic cohort
All patients sustaining an ischemic event (i.e., cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or stent thrombosis) within 1 year of PCI.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a catheter-based technique performed under fluoroscopic guidance to treat coronary artery disease and restore blood flow to the myocardium. During PCI, coronary vessel patency is generally achieved with drug-eluting stents, which are metallic scaffolds coated with a polymer that carry and gradually release an antiproliferative drug. In the present study, all participants underwent PCI with implantation of a thin-strut, cobalt-chromium, durable-fluorinated polymer, everolimus-eluting stent (XIENCE, Abbott), and received a course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) ranging from 28 to 365 days after PCI.
Bleeding cohort
All patients sustaining a major bleeding event (i.e., Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3-5) within 1 year of PCI.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a catheter-based technique performed under fluoroscopic guidance to treat coronary artery disease and restore blood flow to the myocardium. During PCI, coronary vessel patency is generally achieved with drug-eluting stents, which are metallic scaffolds coated with a polymer that carry and gradually release an antiproliferative drug. In the present study, all participants underwent PCI with implantation of a thin-strut, cobalt-chromium, durable-fluorinated polymer, everolimus-eluting stent (XIENCE, Abbott), and received a course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) ranging from 28 to 365 days after PCI.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ischemic event
Time Frame: 12 months after PCI
Composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or stent thrombosis.
12 months after PCI
Major bleeding
Time Frame: 12 months after PCI
Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3-5 bleeding
12 months after PCI

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Roxana Mehran, Abbott

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Percutaneous coronary intervention

Subscribe