Exercise With Scleroderma Functional Outcomes

May 17, 2024 updated by: Gizem Özbudak, Trakya University

The Effect of Exercise Program Applied to Patients With Scleroderma on Functional Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The study aims to investigate the effects of an exercise program applied to patients with scleroderma on functional outcomes (hand and mouth functional results and quality of life).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) is a significant, rare autoimmune connective tissue disease characterized by autoantibodies, fibrosis of the skin and internal organs, microvascular injury and vascular damage due to endothelial cell activation (Sepulveda et al., 2019; Rosendahl et al., 2022). The term "scleroderma" is derived from two Greek words "sklero" and "derma" meaning hard skin (Bielacka et al., 2017; Singh et al., 2019).

The global prevalence of scleroderma is estimated to be between 0.3 and 40 per 100,000 population (Alhendi et al., 2020; Benz et al., 2021; Sierakowska et al., 2019). The occurrence of systemic sclerosis in women is three to five times and in some literature up to eight times higher than in men. The disease incidence peaks between the ages of 30 and 65 (Sierakowska et al., 2019; Hughes et al., 2020; Alhendi et al., 2020).

Impairment of hand functions is one of the most significant disabilities in patients with scleroderma and is commonly observed (Gregory et al., 2019; Mugii et al., 2019). The skin of the hand thickens with manifestations including fingertip ulcers, swelling of the fingers, raynaud's phenomenon and subcutaneous calcium deposition (Abreu et al., 2023). Deformities such as loss of flexion in the metacarpophalangeal joints, loss of extension in the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints, loss of abduction, flexion of the thumb and wrist movement can occur, leading to contractures and severe impairment of hand functions (Bongi & Rosso, 2016; Vannajak et al., 2014).

Besides hand function impairment, another significant issue in scleroderma is the fibrotic involvement of the connective tissue of the face and mouth. Patients tend to lose facial expression. Sclerosis of the skin around the lips and mouth area causes a reduction in mouth opening (microstomia) and width (microcheilia) in 43% to 80% of cases (Puzio et al., 2019; Uras et al., 2019).

Rehabilitation strategies which play a crucial role in the management of scleroderma, include psychoeducational interventions, exercise therapy, application of physical methods, assistive devices and orthoses; joint protection and energy conservation approaches, dietary interventions and comprehensive multidisciplinary team care programs (Schouffoer et al., 2011). Among these interventions daily hand exercises are specifically mentioned to improve hand movement and function, and also mouth and facial exercises positively affect mouth opening function (Gregory et al., 2019). Hand rehabilitation enhances hand movement, functionality and strength, as well as participation in daily life activities such as self-care, housework, work and recreational activities, thereby improving quality of life (Bongi & Rosso, 2016). Exercises that stretch the mouth and increase mouth opening are reported to prevent the progression of microstomia and reduce limitations in mouth opening (Puzio et al., 2019; Yuen et al., 2012). Some approaches and techniques involving active exercises for managing microstomia are suggested, indicating success with the performance of mandibular movements (Puzio et al., 2019).

Programs that include hand and oral rehabilitation interventions are needed to prevent hand deformities and oral dysfunctions, ensure positive body perception, provide coping strategies and maintain quality of life (Schouffoer et al., 2011; Vannajak et al., 2014). However, individuals with a rare disease such as scleroderma face many challenges, including lack of knowledge about the disease, difficulties in accurate diagnosis and limited treatment and support options. Professional support services that are usually provided to individuals with more common diseases are not available for scleroderma patients (Delisle et al., 2019).

Scleroderma is a chronic disease that affects multiple systems and can present numerous symptoms and complications, impacting individuals physically, psychologically and socially. Therefore, the care of patients with scleroderma requires an interdisciplinary holistic health approach that encompasses both physical and emotional support. The rarity of scleroderma, the fact that many patients live far from physical therapy and rehabilitation clinics or the necessity of continuous participation in a program necessitates the implementation of nurse-led home programs (Murphy et al., 2018).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Edirne, Turkey
        • Gizem Özbudak

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The inclusion criteria were being aged between 18 to 70 years, having no communication problems, being able to speak Turkish and agreeing to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • . The exclusion criteria were not having the ability to regularly perform hand and mouth exercises, having undergone hand surgery in the last six months, having open wounds or contractures on the hand, having hand and mouth functional disorders due to reasons other than scleroderma, having no teeth, having all upper and lower teeth as dentures and being included in a rehabilitation program in the last three months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Exercise Program
In the control group the standard protocol was applied. The standard protocol included routine care and treatment practices conducted by the same physician at the same institution. In the intervention group in addition to the standard protocol, an exercise program intervention was applied and after the initial interview the "Exercise Program DVD" was provided through mobile phone. All patients were evaluated 4 times: at baseline, at the 4th week (first visit), at the 8th week (second visit) and at the 12th week (final visit) after randomization
In the intervention group in addition to the standard protocol, an exercise program intervention was applied and after the initial interview the "Exercise Program DVD" was provided through mobile phone. All patients were evaluated 4 times: at baseline, at the 4th week (first visit), at the 8th week (second visit) and at the 12th week (final visit) after randomization
No Intervention: Standart Protocol
The standard protocol included routine care and treatment practices conducted by the same physician at the same institution.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Demographic and disease characteristics of the participants
Time Frame: After 12 weeks
Of the patients included in the study, 50.0% (22 patients) were in the intervention group and 50.0% (22 patients) were in the control group. 95.5% of the intervention group were women and 4.5% were men, with the control group also comprising 95.5% women and 4.5% men patients. The mean age of the all patients was 51.70 ± 11.11 years. 63.6% of patients in the intervention group and 59.1% of patients in the control group were diagnosed with diffuse cutaneous scleroderma. The mean duration of scleroderma diagnosis of all the patients was 9.54 ± 6.73 years for the intervention group and 9.4 ± 6.20 years for the control group. The majority in both groups (63.6% in the intervention group / 95.5% in the control group) were nonsmokers. Table 1 compares the demographic and disease characteristics of the groups. Groups were similar with regard to the demographic and disease characteristics.
After 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hand functional outcomes of the participants
Time Frame: After 12 weeks
Upon examining the final follow-up hand functional outcomes of the intervention and control group patients, it has been observed that there is a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the average total score of the Duruöz Hand Scale for all sub-dimensions including kitchen, dressing, cleaning, workplace and other activities, as well as the overall average total score (p<0.05)
After 12 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oral functional results of the participants
Time Frame: After 12 weeks
The mouth opening measurements at the final follow-up of the intervention and control group patients included in the study are compared in Table 3. A statistically significant difference was found between the final follow-up mouth opening measurement values of the groups (p<0.05)
After 12 weeks
Quality of life results of the participants
Time Frame: After 12 weeks
The final follow-up scores of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) Scale averages for the patients in the intervention and control groups who participated in the study were compared. When all subdomains of the scale were evaluated, it was determined that there was a statistically significant difference between the final follow-up total score averages for the physical, psychological, social and environmental domains of the patients in both the intervention and control groups (p<0.05)
After 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gizem Özbudak, PhD, Trakya University
  • Study Chair: Serap Özer, PhD, Ege University
  • Study Chair: Figen Yargucu Zihni, MD, Ege University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 5, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 5, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 5, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe