Information and Music Therapy As a Means of Reducing Preoperative Anxiety in Outpatient Surgery. (Harmonie)

February 10, 2025 updated by: Hopital Foch

Information and Music Therapy As a Means of Reducing Preoperative Anxiety in Outpatient Surgery. Outpatient Surgery: a Before-and-after Study

This is a monocentric, prospective, before-and-after, open-label controlled study, two groups of 99 patients each: "control" group - usual care - versus "intervention" group "Intervention" group - patient information via an explanatory video followed by a 15-minute music therapy session of the patient's choice in the operating waiting room.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Although general anaesthesia is used for almost 10 million procedures a year, and the safety of this procedure has improved considerably over the last 25 years, notably with the "safety decree" of December 1994, general anaesthesia remains deeply associated with high levels of preoperative anxiety. Anxiety levels are correlated with two perioperative factors:

  • the need for more anesthetic agents to achieve the same level of depth of anesthesia in anxious patients compared to non-anxious/low-anxiety patients
  • Development of chronic postoperative pain.

The preoperative consultation and visit by an anaesthetist is an important meeting point to reduce these high levels of anxiety. On the other hand, systematic benzodiazepine-based premedication has been abandoned for some years now, and taking action to reduce the level of anxiety is one of today's challenges, using a variety of means: organizational, video, music, virtual reality, hypnosis...

Unfortunately, the level of publication on the subject remains low.

Currently, a local analysis of this pathway shows several waiting times for which patients are not necessarily informed, and which can generate anxiety during treatment. In addition, our preliminary survey on the subject showed a specific need for information on pain management and anaesthesia recovery. and anesthesia recovery.

The goal of this study was to design a two-group comparative study aiming of significantly reducing perioperative anxiety in outpatients by implementing simple solutions. More specifically, our project focuses on the impact of music therapy and dedicated information via an explanatory video of the patient's journey through the operating room on the level of perioperative anxiety.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

198

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Suresnes, France, 92150
        • Foch Hospital
      • Suresnes, France, 92150
        • Drci Foch Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient over the age of 18 undergoing scheduled outpatient surgery in the central
  • under general anesthesia. The surgeries surgeries concerned are versatile: Digestive (inguinal hernias, proctology, cholecystectomy, etc.), thoracic endoscopy (biopsy examination under GA), gynecological (hysteroscopy, diagnostic laparoscopy diagnostic laparoscopy, cerclage...), ENT (endoscopies, septoplasty, meatotomy...), Urology (JJ catheter insertionTOT/TVT, botulinum toxin injection...), vascular (stripping)
  • Patient with oral non-opposition prior to any study procedure
  • Not to have objected to inclusion in the research
  • Patient affiliated to a health insurance scheme

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing emergency surgery, considered full stomach
  • Patient not respecting the central block route (interventional radiology in this case)
  • First patients in the program because they present the risk of less than than 15 minutes
  • Patients who do not understand French
  • Patient deprived of liberty or under guardianship
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Experimental: Intervention
patient information via a video explaining the procedure, followed by a15-minute music therapy session of your choice in the OR waiting room.
The patient will benefit from viewing the video and the music therapy session in the waiting room of the operating room. The patient will be asked again for their anxiety score using an anxiety scale. This will define the main outcome of the study. Following this collection and in order not to influence the response, investigators will collect from the patient his compliance with the two proposed techniques as well as his appreciation of the tool.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare the proportion of patients with high anxiety (Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain greater than or equal to 40/100) in operating waiting room between the two groups (before and after implementation of the actions).
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
The primary endpoint was the presence or absence of high anxiety in operating waiting room (T2), measured by an VAS score > 40/100. A range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
up to 24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare anxiety levels in preoperative reception unit (T1) and in post anesthesia care unit room (T3) between the two groups: Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) and VAS score
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
VAS score and APAIS in preoperative reception unit (T1) and in post anesthesia care unit room (T3). A range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity. The APAIS scale is a six-item questionnaire graded on a five-point Likert scale from 1=not at all to 5=extremely
up to 24 hours
Compare anxiety levels in operating waiting room (T2)
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
VAS score in operating room waiting room (T2). A range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
up to 24 hours
Compare the time to loss of consciousness measured in the operating room between both groups
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
Time to loss of consciousness measured in the operating room (time between injection of hypnotic agent (propofol) and a sleep depth measurement less than 60)
up to 24 hours
Compare the amount of propofol (mg/kg) at induction required to achieve loss of consciousness between the two groups.
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
Amount of propofol (mg/kg) at induction required to achieve loss of consciousness
up to 24 hours
Evaluate the level of satisfaction of each action implemented using a specific questionnaire at the end of the program.
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
Level of satisfaction using a specific questionnaire at the end of the Licker scale
up to 24 hours
Evaluate the proportion of dropouts for each action, i.e. the proportion of patients who did not viewed the video until the end, or did not complete the entire music therapy session.
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
Action completed in full or partially yes or no
up to 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Morgan LE GUEN, MD, Foch Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 5, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

July 5, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021_0188
  • 2023-A02493-42 (Registry Identifier: ID-RCB number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ambulatory Surgery

Clinical Trials on music therapy

Subscribe