Evaluation of the Impact of the SMART ANGEL ™ Device on Follow-up at Home Following Major or Intermediate Outpatient Surgery (SMART ANGEL 2)

Evaluation of the Impact of the SMART ANGEL ™ Device on Follow-up at Home Following Major or Intermediate Outpatient Surgery: Randomized Controlled Open-label Trial

The investigators hypothesize that by monitoring and analyzing physiological parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, saturation) and well-being (pain, nausea, vomiting, comfort) the SMART ANGEL ™ device improves the quality of care after major or intermediate outpatient surgery. This active surveillance will result in a decrease in the rate of unplanned recourse (hospitalization, consultation, telephone call).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1260

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alès, France, 30100
        • Clinique Bonnefon
      • Amiens, France, 80054
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie
      • Arras, France, 62000
        • Hôpital Privé les Bonnettes
      • Avignon, France, 84000
        • Centre Hospitalier Henri Duffaut
      • Lille, France, 59000
        • CHU Lille
      • Marseille, France, 13915
        • Hôpital Nord
      • Montpellier, France, 34090
        • Hopital Lapeyronie
      • Nîmes, France, 30029
        • CHU de Nîmes
      • Nîmes, France, 30900
        • Polyclinique Grand Sud
      • Paris, France, 75674
        • Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
      • Saint-Etienne, France, 42055
        • CHU de Saint-Etienne
      • Saint-Jean-de-Védas, France, 34430
        • Clinique St Jean

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form
  • The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • The patient is undergoing ambulatory surgery for:

    • in orthopedics: shoulder (arthroscopy, abutment, prosthesis), hip (prosthesis, arthrolysis), knee (osteotomy, ligamentoplasty), ankle (prosthesis, ligamentoplasty) foot (hallux valgus); removal of major or multi-site equipment;
    • digestive (cholecystectomy, hernia repair, partial gastrectomy, colectomy, cleaning);
    • in gynecology (hysterectomy, oophorectomy, mastectomy, quadrantectomy, dissection, cystoplasty, sphincter);
    • in urology (total or partial resection of the prostate);
    • ENT (thyroidectomy, tonsillectomy);
    • Neurosurgery (herniated disc);
    • Vascular (stripping varix, creating fistula).
  • The patient has sufficient intellectual and cognitive capacity to use the devices
  • The patient must pass the test performed during the anesthesia consultation, namely:

    • open and connect the tablet,
    • activate the measurement of the blood pressure and the measurement of the oxygen saturation,
    • be connected to a 4G network

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The subject is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study
  • The subject refuses to sign the consent
  • It is impossible to give the subject informed information
  • The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship
  • The patient is pregnant
  • The patient is undergoing emergency or minor surgery
  • Patient has a psychological class ASA 5
  • Patient is non-eligible for ambulatory surgery for medical reasons (decompensated medical pathology) or social reasons according to the criteria defined by the société française anesthésie réanimation. Person lives alone or has a geographical distance from a hospital center> 30 km (or> 45 min by car).
  • Patient who doesn't classify for ambulatory surgery at time of discharge

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Experimental: Complete Smart Angel
Smat Angel application with artificial intelligence
Patient issued with a tablet with the Smart Angel application to monitor clinical signs and symptoms
Experimental: Basic Smart Angel
Smat Angel application without artificial intelligence
Patient issued with a tablet with the Smart Angel application to monitor clinical signs and symptoms

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Non-scheduled hospitalization rates between groups
Time Frame: Day 5
%
Day 5
Number of non-scheduled consultations between groups
Time Frame: Day 5
%
Day 5
Rates of calls with nurses between groups
Time Frame: Day 5
%
Day 5
Rates of calls with doctors between groups
Time Frame: Day 5
%
Day 5
Rates of unplanned prescriptions between groups
Time Frame: Day 5
%
Day 5
Rates of unplanned exams between groups
Time Frame: Day 5
%
Day 5

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of complications between groups
Time Frame: Day 1
% patients reported any of: nausea, vomiting, constipation, allergy, shivering, insomnia, pain, fever, sore throat, lower back pain, headache, hypotension, bradycardia, hallucination, fainting, reopening of the incision, repeated surgery, abscess, bleeding, or bruising
Day 1
Rate of complications between groups
Time Frame: Day 2
% patients reported any of: nausea, vomiting, constipation, allergy, shivering, insomnia, pain, fever, sore throat, lower back pain, headache, hypotension, bradycardia, hallucination, fainting, reopening of the incision, repeated surgery, abscess, bleeding, or bruising
Day 2
Rate of complications between groups
Time Frame: Day 3
% patients reported any of: nausea, vomiting, constipation, allergy, shivering, insomnia, pain, fever, sore throat, lower back pain, headache, hypotension, bradycardia, hallucination, fainting, reopening of the incision, repeated surgery, abscess, bleeding, or bruising
Day 3
Rate of complications between groups
Time Frame: Day 4
% patients reported any of: nausea, vomiting, constipation, allergy, shivering, insomnia, pain, fever, sore throat, lower back pain, headache, hypotension, bradycardia, hallucination, fainting, reopening of the incision, repeated surgery, abscess, bleeding, or bruising
Day 4
Rate of complications between groups
Time Frame: Day 5
% patients reported any of: nausea, vomiting, constipation, allergy, shivering, insomnia, pain, fever, sore throat, lower back pain, headache, hypotension, bradycardia, hallucination, fainting, reopening of the incision, repeated surgery, abscess, bleeding, or bruising
Day 5
Rate of complications between groups
Time Frame: Month 1
% patients reported any of: nausea, vomiting, constipation, allergy, shivering, insomnia, pain, fever, sore throat, lower back pain, headache, hypotension, bradycardia, hallucination, fainting, reopening of the incision, repeated surgery, abscess, bleeding, or bruising
Month 1
Rate of readmission between groups
Time Frame: Month 1
Yes/No
Month 1
Date of return to work or other activity
Time Frame: 1 Month
Dd/mm/yyyy
1 Month
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Day 6
Visual Analog Scale 0-10
Day 6
Patient quality of life
Time Frame: 1 month
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire taken over the phone
1 month
Difficulties in using the device
Time Frame: Day 5
In-house developed usage questionnaire assessing measurement difficulties, saving errors, connection problems, problem contacting care staff
Day 5
Requirement of external help in using the device
Time Frame: Day 5
Description of person sought for advice
Day 5
Times spent on device
Time Frame: Day 5
Hours; automatically calculated by device for time used for manipulation and time for navigation
Day 5
Technical errors arising
Time Frame: Day 5
Automatically calculated by device
Day 5

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Christhophe Boisson, CHU Nîmes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 21, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

November 18, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CIVI/2018/PC-01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ambulatory Surgery

Clinical Trials on Smart Angel

Subscribe