Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Prosthetic Polymer Heart Valves for the Treatment of Aortic Valve Disease

December 11, 2024 updated by: Suzhou Hearthill Medical Technology Co.,LTD

Prospective Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Prosthetic Polymer Heart Valves for the Treatment of Aortic Valve Disease

The purpose of this study is to conduct the initial clinical investigation of the HeartHill Medical's polymer aortic valve, namely PoliaVavle,to collect evidence on the device's safety and performance.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The polymer aortic valve, PoliaValve, from HeartHIll Medical, is indicated as a replacement for patients with severe aortic valve disease, including severe aortic stenosis, severe aortic regurgitation, or both. These patients will be included in the study after systematic assessment that the subjects meet the criteria for inclusion in the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Shanghai General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects must meet all the following conditions:

  1. Subjects are ≥60 years old;
  2. The subjects understand the nature and purpose of the research, voluntarily participate and sign the informed consent form, comply with the trial requirements, are willing to cooperate with surgical treatment and follow-up, and agree to relevant follow-up interviews and examinations;
  3. The subject is diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation (or insufficiency) through echocardiography;
  4. According to the 2020 ACC/AHA management guidelines for patients with valvular heart disease, the subject meets the indications for aortic valve replacement surgery and the preoperative assessment recommends surgical aortic valve replacement.

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects must not meet any of the following conditions:

  1. Other valve diseases with indications for surgery, such as severe mitral regurgitation, severe tricuspid regurgitation, moderate or above mitral stenosis, etc. require combined valve replacement, or had aortic valve surgery in the past;
  2. Other serious cardiovascular diseases with indications for surgery, such as Stanford type A aortic dissection, aortic sinus aneurysm (sinus diameter >5.0cm), hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, diffuse three-vessel coronary artery disease , end-stage heart failure while simultaneously placing a left ventricular assist device, etc.;
  3. End-stage heart failure that is expected to be irreversible by aortic valve surgery, such as severe left ventricular dysfunction with LVEF <25%, or severe heart failure that cannot be corrected, or severe pulmonary hypertension assessed by right heart catheterization, predict postoperative plans Perform Impella, IABP or left ventricular assist within the hospital;
  4. Decompensated heart failure, cardiogenic shock, malignant arrhythmia, etc. that require mechanical circulatory assistance, mechanical ventilation or emergency surgery before surgery;
  5. Active endocarditis or vegetations on the heart within 3 months;
  6. History of severe acute myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accident within 3 months (excluding lacunar infarction);
  7. Those with severe renal insufficiency (GFR <30mL/min) or end-stage renal disease requiring long-term dialysis;
  8. Liver dysfunction or gastrointestinal dystrophy;
  9. Patients with active bleeding, bleeding tendency or unable to receive anticoagulation treatment;
  10. Those with severe ventilation or ventilatory dysfunction who require continuous oxygen therapy;
  11. Those who have poor compliance or cognitive impairment (such as coma, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, drug abuse), are unable to comply with requirements or refuse to cooperate in completing study follow-up visits;
  12. Other reasons causing life expectancy to be less than 1 year, such as malignant tumors and immunodeficiency diseases;
  13. Other situations in which patients are not suitable for artificial aortic valve replacement or are not suitable to participate in this trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PoliaValve (Aortic)
Patients receiving the PoliaValve (Aortic) from HearrHill Medical
Aortic Valve Replacement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compliance rate of prosthetic valve function
Time Frame: 1 month following patient enrollment completion
The compliance rate of prosthetic valve function evaluation at 1 month after surgery. The standard of prosthetic valve function is as follows: prosthetic valve pressure difference <20mmHg or peak flow rate < 3m/s, no moderate or above intravalvular regurgitation or paravalvular leakage), and no reintervention is required.
1 month following patient enrollment completion
Surgery success rate
Time Frame: 1 month following patient enrollment completion
Event-free survival of the prosthetic valve at 1 month postoperatively. Prosthetic valve degeneration includes stenosis and/or regurgitation due to structural abnormalities of the valve itself (e.g., leaflet tears, detachment, calcification, fibrosis, deformation of the valve frame, and fracture of the material of the connecting parts between the valve components) (referred to as structural valve degeneration), as well as dysfunction due to infective endocarditis, perivalvular leakage, valve prosthesis-patient mismatch, valve displacement, and leaflet thrombosis (referred to as nonstructural valve degeneration). Prosthetic valve degeneration usually consists of three stages, with the first stage consisting of morphological evidence of valve degeneration and structural abnormalities, before significant hemodynamic changes are evident.
1 month following patient enrollment completion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EOA
Time Frame: baseline and 1 month, 6months, 12months following patient enrollment completion
Use echocardiography to evaluate the effective valve orifice area(EOA) to assess the hemodynamic Performance.
baseline and 1 month, 6months, 12months following patient enrollment completion
Mean transvalvular pressure difference
Time Frame: baseline and 1 month, 6months, 12months following patient enrollment completion
Use echocardiography to measure the mean transvalvular pressure difference.
baseline and 1 month, 6months, 12months following patient enrollment completion
Peak flow velocity
Time Frame: baseline and 1 month, 6months, 12months following patient enrollment completion
Use echocardiography to measure the peak flow velocity.
baseline and 1 month, 6months, 12months following patient enrollment completion
Regurgitation
Time Frame: baseline and 1 month, 6months, 12months following patient enrollment completion
Evaluate the presence or absence of intravalvular or paravalvular regurgitation during the follow-up period by echocardiography.
baseline and 1 month, 6months, 12months following patient enrollment completion
New York Heart Association Assessment (NYHA)
Time Frame: baseline and 1 month, 6months, 12months following patient enrollment completion
Evaluate New York Heart Association Assessment (NYHA) to see Heart Function Improvement.
baseline and 1 month, 6months, 12months following patient enrollment completion
BNP or NT-proBNP
Time Frame: baseline and 1 month, 12months following patient enrollment completion
Measure BNP or NT-proBNP to get the changes in postoperative cardiac function from baseline.
baseline and 1 month, 12months following patient enrollment completion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe