- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06618066
Decision-making Preferences and Its Related Factors on Parents With Children Having Cancer
September 25, 2024 updated by: Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
A cross-sectional correlational study was conducted in the pediatric hematology-oncology ward and outpatient clinic of a medical center in southern Taiwan.
Participants included fathers or mothers of children diagnosed with cancer aged between 20 and 65 years.
Structured questionnaires were used, including FACES IV, JCS, and CPS-P.
This study aims to explore the current status of family cohesion, coping behaviors, and decision making preferences among parents of children with cancer, and to identify factors influencing decision making preferences.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
130
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Kaohsiung Medical University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
The study was conducted in the pediatric hematology-oncology ward and outpatient clinic of a medical center in southern Taiwan.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Parents aged between 20 and 65 years whose child has been diagnosed with pediatric cancer by a physician.
- Individuals who understand Mandarin or Taiwanese Hokkien and are able to complete the questionnaire.
- Individuals who consent to participate in the study after being informed of the research purpose.
Exclusion Criteria:
(1)Individuals diagnosed with a mental illness by a physician.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Exploring the current state of decision-making preferences among parents of children with cancer using the Control Preferences Scale for Pediatrics (CPS-P)
Time Frame: Single point in time: At enrollment
|
The CPS-P is a method for assessing individual preferences in medical decision-making roles, consisting of five options that represent five different roles.(A)
I prefer to make the final decision about which treatment my child will receive, (B) I prefer to make the final selection of my child's treatment after seriously considering my doctor's opinion, (C) I prefer that my child's doctor and I share responsibility for deciding which treatment is best for my child, (D) I prefer that my doctor makes the final decision about which treatment will be used, but seriously considers my opinion, (E) I prefer to leave all decisions regarding my child's treatment to my doctor.
The five responses are classified into three categories representing active(A and B), collaborative (C) and passive (D and E) decision-making preference.
|
Single point in time: At enrollment
|
|
Exploring the current state of family cohesion among parents of children with cancer using the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale (FACES)
Time Frame: Single point in time: At enrollment
|
The evaluation of family functioning involves: (1) Balanced Scales: Cohesion and Flexibility, (2) Unbalanced Scales: Disengaged, Enmeshed, Rigid, and Chaotic, (3) Family Communication, and (4) Family Satisfaction.
The instrument consists of eight subscales with a total of 62 items, rated on a five-point Likert scale.
The Family Cohesion and Flexibility scales include 42 items (0-42), divided into six sections with scores ranging from 7 to 35 per section.
The Family Communication scale, which assesses positive communication and openness, contains 10 items (43-52) with scores ranging from 10 to 50.
The Family Satisfaction scale, measuring satisfaction with cohesion, flexibility, and communication, also has 10 items (53-62), scoring from 10 to 50.
Higher scores on Cohesion and Flexibility suggest a healthier family system; higher scores on Disengaged, Enmeshed, Rigid, and Chaotic indicate dysfunction; higher scores on Communication and Satisfaction denote more positive perceptions.
|
Single point in time: At enrollment
|
|
Exploring the current coping behaviors of parents of children with cancer using the Jalowiec Coping Scale (JCS)
Time Frame: Single point in time: At enrollment
|
The Jalowiec Coping Scale (JCS) assesses eight types of coping strategies, which are categorized into emotion-oriented and problem-oriented approaches.
The emotion-oriented strategies include: evasive strategies (13 items), optimistic strategies (9 items), fatalistic strategies (4 items), emotive strategies (5 items), and palliative strategies (7 items).
The problem-oriented strategies include: confrontive strategies (10 items), supportant strategies (5 items), and self-reliant strategies (7 items).
It utilizes a four-point Likert scale, where "0 = never used," "1 = seldom used," "2 = sometimes used," and "3 = often used."
Higher scores indicate a higher frequency of coping strategy use.
|
Single point in time: At enrollment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Li-Min Wu, PhD, Kaohsiung Medical University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The Control Preferences Scale. Can J Nurs Res. 1997 Fall;29(3):21-43.
- Jalowiec A, Murphy SP, Powers MJ. Psychometric assessment of the Jalowiec Coping Scale. Nurs Res. 1984 May-Jun;33(3):157-61.
- Olson D. FACES IV and the Circumplex Model: validation study. J Marital Fam Ther. 2011 Jan;37(1):64-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00175.x.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 18, 2023
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 17, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
January 17, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 18, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 25, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
October 1, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 1, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 25, 2024
Last Verified
August 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- KMUHIRB-E(II)-20230162
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.