Effect of Enamel Matrix Derivative or Hyaluronic Acid on Non-Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis

September 26, 2024 updated by: Sıla Çağrı İşler, Gazi University

Adjunctive Local Application of Enamel Matrix Derivative or Hyaluronic Acid to Non-surgical Mechanical Treatment of Peri-implantitis: a 12-month Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The aim of the present randomized controlled clinical study is to compare the clinical, radiographic, and patient-centered efficacy of adjunctive application of either enamel matrix derivative (EMD) or hyaluronic acid (HA) gel in conjunction with non-surgical therapy compared to non-surgical therapy alone following a 12-month healing period.

Therefore, the following question related to the study is raised:

• Does the adjunctive local application of EMD or HA to non-surgical submucosal mechanical treatment of peri-implantitis result in better clinical, radiographic, and patient-centered outcomes compared to non-surgical therapy alone?

A total of 60 patients referred to the Gazi University Department of Periodontology, will be randomly assigned to receive the local application of EMD or HA in combination with non-surgical submucosal mechanical treatment of peri-implantitis or non-surgical therapy alone. Clinical measurements will be recorded at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgeries. Patient oral health related to the treatment procedures using a written questionnaire [Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14)] and post-treatment pain and overall patient satisfaction about treatment modalities responses will be evaluated prior to treatment and 3, 6, and 12 months following therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Peri-implantitis is considered a growing public health problem in implant dentistry due to its higher prevalence and non-linear accelerating progression pattern. Hence, it is imperative to apply effective treatment strategies to manage this pathological condition. The existing evidence has shown unpredictable therapeutic strategies for peri-implantitis. Conventional non-surgical treatment procedures based on the removal of biofilm accumulation and debridement/instrumentation of the implant surface have exhibited limited disease resolution and persistent inflammation following therapy. Therefore, the application of adjunctive chemotherapeutic bioagents may provide greater disease resolution and reduce the need for surgical treatment.

The application of EMD as an adjunctive measure in peri-implantitis treatment has been suggested to provide favorable outcomes by accelerating wound healing, reducing inflammation, having antimicrobial and antiseptic effects, and osteopromotive features. Although some studies exhibited clinical and radiographic efficacy of EMD in augmentative and non-augmentative surgical management of peri-implantitis, there is no study in the available literature analyzing the effects of flapless application of EMD in non-surgical therapy of peri-implantitis. Cross-linked HA, which has recently been recognized as a featured adjuvant chemotherapeutic bioagent, has also been shown to have beneficial effects in periodontal wound healing and soft and hard tissue regeneration. The use of high-molecular-weight HA has been demonstrated to alter bacterial colonization in the advanced stage of peri-implantitis. However, there is limited evidence about the therapeutic effect of cross-linked HA in peri-implantitis management.

The hypothesis of the study is that the application of EMD and cross-linked HA adjunct to non-surgical therapy could lead to superior outcomes compared to non-surgical therapy alone in peri-implantitis treatment. The null-hypothesis (H0) is that no statistically significant difference in terms of the mean change of probing depth (PD) values after 12 months would be detected among all the study groups.

The aim of the present randomized controlled clinical study is to compare the clinical, radiographic, and patient-centered efficacy of adjunctive application of either enamel matrix derivative (EMD) or hyaluronic acid (HA) gel in conjunction with non-surgical therapy compared to non-surgical therapy alone following a 12-month healing period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Systemically healthy and ≥18 years of age,
  • Implants with an SLA® or SLActive® surface (Straumann Dental Implant System, Institute Straumann AG) have been in function for more than 1 year,
  • Implant-supported prostheses accessible for self-performed plaque control and submarginal instrumentation,
  • Absence of implant mobility.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) > 20%
  • Full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) > 20%
  • Cigarette smoking > 10 cig./day,
  • Diagnosed with active periodontal disease,
  • Having acute or chronic medical conditions or undergoing medications, such as intravenous amino-bisphosphonates, immunosuppressive drugs, and chemotherapy, that could interfere with the treatment outcome,
  • Receiving antibiotic treatment in the previous 3 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Test Group 1: EMD group
After submarginal instrumentation (i.e., titanium curettes plus oscillating chitosan brush), implant surfaces will be conditioned for 2 min with 24% ethylene-diaminetetraacetate EDTA (PrefGel®, Institut Straumann AG). Then, the sites will be completely rinsed with saline solution and thoroughly dried with air. Repeated irrigation and air-drying will be done in the area until complete bleeding control with sterile gauzes. Then EMD (Emdogain®, Institut Straumann AG) will be gently applied with a blunt-tipped sterile syringe until overflowing from the mucosal margin.
After submarginal instrumentation (i.e., titanium curettes plus oscillating chitosan brush), implant surfaces will be conditioned for 2 min with 24% ethylene-diaminetetraacetate EDTA (PrefGel®, Institut Straumann AG). Then, the sites will be completely rinsed with saline solution and thoroughly dried with air. Repeated irrigation and air-drying will be done in the area until complete bleeding control with sterile gauzes. Then EMD (Emdogain®, Institut Straumann AG) will be gently applied with a blunt-tipped sterile syringe until overflowing from the mucosal margin.
Active Comparator: Test Group 2: HA group
After submarginal instrumentation of the implant surface (i.e., titanium curettes plus oscillating chitosan brush), the cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel composed of a mixture of cross-linked (1.6%) and natural (0.2%) will be will be implemented to the peri-implant pockets.
After submarginal instrumentation of the implant surface (i.e., titanium curettes plus oscillating chitosan brush), the cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel composed of a mixture of cross-linked (1.6%) and natural (0.2%) will be will be implemented to the peri-implant pockets.
Placebo Comparator: Control group
Implants allocated to the control group will be treated with the same sub-marginal instrumentation (i.e., titanium curettes plus oscillating chitosan brush). Implant surface will be irrigated with with sterile saline.
Implants allocated to the control group will be treated with the same sub-marginal instrumentation (i.e., titanium curettes plus oscillating chitosan brush). Implant surface will be irrigated with with sterile saline.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in peri-implant pocket depth
Time Frame: 12 months after the treatment
Peri-implant pocket depth (PPD) values will be measured at six sites of each implant. The mean PPD change will be calculated as the difference between the 12-month follow-up PPD relative to the baseline PPD.
12 months after the treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment success (%)
Time Frame: 12 months after the treatment
Treatment success (%) will be considered as PPD ≤ 5 mm with no bleeding on probing (PPD) (more than one point) or suppuration (SUP) and no further bone loss
12 months after the treatment
Disease resolution (%)
Time Frame: 12 months after the treatment
Disease resolution (%) will be considered as PPD≥5 mm without any BOP or SUP and complete radiographic bone fill
12 months after the treatment
Oral Health Impact Profile 14
Time Frame: 12 months after the treatment
Patient oral health related to the treatment procedures will be evaluated using a written questionnaire [Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14)] prior to treatment and at 12 months after the treatment.
12 months after the treatment
Post-treatment pain
Time Frame: 12 months after the treatment
Patients' responses will be scored on a visual analog scale (VAS, 100 mm). The VAS-pain will be scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst possible pain).
12 months after the treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

It is preferred to share all IPD collected throughout the study after the study will be completed and at the publication stage.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peri-implantitis

Clinical Trials on Enamel Matrix Derivative application

Subscribe