Collagen Matrix With and Without Enamel Matrix Derivative

Porcine Collagen Matrix With and Without Enamel Matrix Derivative for the Treatment of Gingival Recession Defects

The purpose of this prospective, double-blinded, randomized, split-mouth study is to compare the effectiveness of a porcine collagen matrix (CM) and coronally advanced flap (CAF) with or without the addition of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) in the treatment of Miller Class I, II, or predictable class III recession defects. One defect will receive CM + CAF + EMD (Experimental), while the other will receive CM + CAF (Control) alone. The treatment of 60 similarly sized Miller class I, II, or predictable class III recession defects on single-rooted teeth in 30 subjects using CM + CAF + EMD or CM + CAF alone will be evaluated. The subjects will be in good health, non-smokers, periodontally healthy with good oral hygiene and have no contraindications to periodontal surgery. Paired, similar sized defects on single-rooted teeth will be in the same subject and measure within 2mm of each other. One defect will be randomly assigned as the test group using CM + CAF + EMD, and the other as the control group using only CM + CAF. Clinical measurements will be made using a UNC-15 periodontal probe by calibrated, board certified periodontists and will include: probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), vertical recession (RD), and width of keratinized tissue (KT). Percent root coverage (%RC) will be calculated. The measurements will be used to evaluate surgical outcome. Surgical outcome will also be assessed using stone models. All measurements will be taken at baseline (on the day of the surgery) and 3 and 6 months post-surgery for comparison.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants must meet health eligibility requirements and not have any conditions that will exclude them from the study (see exclusion criteria below). Females of reproductive age will be asked to submit urine samples for pregnancy testing prior to surgery. Urine HCG tests will be conducted in the Department of Periodontics in accordance with WRNNMC Bethesda Point of Care Testing Procedures. Pregnant females will be excluded from this study in accordance with standard of care (periodontal surgery is routinely deferred during pregnancy).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or over
  • Patient will remain in the Capital region for at least 6 months following the surgical procedure for follow up appointments
  • Patient must be otherwise periodontally healthy
  • Patient must be systemically healthy (ASA class I or II)
  • Patient must have no contraindications to periodontal surgery
  • Patient must have demonstrated good oral hygiene (plaque index <1 according to Silness and Löe)
  • Paired Miller Class I, II or predictable III recession defects
  • Bilateral, facial defects on single-rooted teeth

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported history of smoking within previous 6 months
  • Does not meet any of the preceding criteria
  • Female patients who are pregnant or nursing
  • Antibiotic medications taken within the last 6 months
  • History of mucogingival surgery at the sites of interest
  • Poor plaque control (>25% of sites)
  • Those with clinically significant systemic disease, which may affect healing (i.e. uncontrolled diabetes or bone metabolic disease)
  • Allergy to chlorhexidine gluconate (Peridex)
  • Does not sign study consent or HIPAA forms
  • Bleeding complications (e.g. hemophilia)
  • Warfarin therapy
  • History of osteoporosis or taking bisphosphonate medications
  • History of radiation therapy in the head and neck area
  • Mobile teeth beyond physiologic mobility
  • Facial restorations at the site to be treated
  • Recession defects that will require more than one 15x20mm Mucograft (per side)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in gingival recession using conventional measurements
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change in gingival recession measurements from baseline to 6 months
Baseline to 6 months
Change in root coverage using digital analysis
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Assessment of surgical outcome by optically scanning stone models captured at baseline to 6 months post-surgery. The digital files will be aligned using global registration and GR recorded by measuring the distance from cemento-enamel junction to the height of the marginal gingiva using computer software. % RC will be calculated by comparing GR at the various times.
Baseline to 6 months
Change in Probing Depths
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change in Probing Depthmeasurements from baseline to 6 months
Baseline to 6 months
Change in Clinical Attachment Levels
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change in Clinical Attachment Levels measurements from baseline to 6 months
Baseline to 6 months
Change in Keratinized Tissue
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change in Keratinized Tissue measurements from baseline to 6 months
Baseline to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of digital vs. conventional measurement
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Compare conventional and digital change in gingival recession to assess the two modalities treatment outcomes
Baseline to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 30, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 16, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gingival Recession

Clinical Trials on enamel matrix derivative

Subscribe